jah4955
Well-Known Member
They're The Electric MayhemThe Muppets - I'm lukewarm on them too - do have a 'bring down the house' mayhem style that this ride needs.
They're The Electric MayhemThe Muppets - I'm lukewarm on them too - do have a 'bring down the house' mayhem style that this ride needs.
Remember the Main Street DJ?I've never seen such consensus that something was a TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE idea!
I don't care either way, but I'm willing to bet a ton more women care about what you describe than the men. Most men literally don't care about celebrity relationships. There's also a zero percent chance you know how much they love each other.That’s because there are millions of men who can’t square away that Travis Kelsey is literally living their ultimate teenage fantasy. Super Bowl winning star NFL player who (is about to) retire and marry a billionaire pop star.
Likewise there is a much smaller subset of women who are similarly upset that a women can become a billionaire pop star and then marry a Super Bowl winning NFL player.
And to top it all off, it’s apparent the two are actually, truely, in love with each other based on their incredible dorky public displays and interviews on the subject.
Envy is a sin people, and it never looks good on anyone.
Signed a non Chiefs fan, non Swiftie who can only really recognize one TS song (Shake it off.)
They are actors. They don't really get married it's just a show. That's all you have to say.No offense, but this was such a surprise to learn, I had to ask the Google to confirm what you were telling me.
Sure enough...
View attachment 897976
I need to go lay down for awhile and absorb all this.
2025 is a dark Christmas indeed.
I don’t mind her, but I don’t think of her when I think of rock n’ roll music.
He's a former mechanical engineer. Close enough to 'scientist' to me (and I'm literally married to a scientist).They are actors. They don't really get married it's just a show. That's all you have to say.
Kinda like Bill Nye the Science guy isn't really a scientist, he just plays one on TV.![]()
To me the idea seems relatable enough to Michael Jackson's Captain EO at Epcot to at least be a good discussion point, or at least not an idea to dismiss as being too crazy to consider. She is amazingly popular main stream, and appears to be working with Disney in at least some capacity, with her special on ABC and her concert series on Disney+.I don't care either way, but I'm willing to bet a ton more women care about what you describe than the men. Most men literally don't care about celebrity relationships. There's also a zero percent chance you know how much they love each other.
In general, it's a terrible idea to make a ride about a "real" person because real people almost always disappoint and polarize.
Let's make it Goofy's Sky School for graduates.
Nevermind politics.To me the idea seems relatable enough to Michael Jackson's Captain EO at Epcot to at least be a good discussion point, or at least not an idea to dismiss as being too crazy to consider. She is amazingly popular main stream, and appears to be working with Disney in at least some capacity, with her special on ABC and her concert series on Disney+.
That being said, I think Chef is right in that making rides/attractions referencing "real" people is problematic, and from personal opinion, even more so now, than it might have been in the past. I was way to young to really have any awareness of social viewpoints related to MJ when he was Captain EO other than i thought it was a neat show when we visited Epcot. But it seems to me that back in the 80/90's and maybe even before that, you had celebrities/musicians that people liked, and the people who didn't just didn't like their music. But you didn't have the negative polarizing effect that i see in modern social media/culture, where in alot of cases, if you don't like someone, you are now against them. Your either team Swift or against her, as opposed to liking her music or just not listening. That makes any attempt to use a real purpose for marketing/rides hard, as your are going to have a built in ant-fan base.
I thought my brothers and I were the only ones who LOVED doing thatI never really wanted to do much in Epcot except ride the double decker bus around
Yeahhhh....my parents likely silently cringed while watching it with my younger brothers and I.My parents “wouldn’t let me” go to EO as a kid cause of MJ.
You never rode 1.0?(and because of that I never rode the original figment ride…. Don’t get me started!!!!)
Signed a non Chiefs fan, non Swiftie who can only really recognize one TS song (Shake it off.)
I'm lukewarm on Swift too, but wouldn’t be averse to her presence. She annoys me in no way.
Nevertheless, for RNRC she lacks a certain edge, there's not enough intensity, madness, hysterics. This is a coaster! It's no coincidence RNRC currently has a hard rock band. The Muppets - I'm lukewarm on them too - do have a 'bring down the house' mayhem style that this ride needs.
B. Taylor Swift is marching towards either irrelevancy or mental illness.
and I thought that was a Mariah Carey song!
I think Universal would’ve put a stop to that.Shame they didn’t retheme RNRC with AC/DC back when Iron Man 2 came out; Shoot To Thrill is a perfect roller coaster song.
Alas, far too late now as Malcolm Young has passed.
I saw AC/DC live last year! They've clearly lost some steam, but was still great. AC/DC would've been a superb choice for RnRC, but obviously one or two decades ago at the latest. Or perhaps not, their 'working class lads' image and Aussi vibes are very different from the flashy Americanism of Aerosmith, who are a better fit for Hollywood.Shame they didn’t retheme RNRC with AC/DC back when Iron Man 2 came out; Shoot To Thrill is a perfect roller coaster song.
Alas, far too late now as Malcolm Young has passed.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.