Tony the Tigger
Well-Known Member
No one asserted that.No, I very much doubt they're going to make further changes to the ride based on the movie
No one asserted that.No, I very much doubt they're going to make further changes to the ride based on the movie
The Executive Creative Director of Walt Disney Imagineering had nothing to do with future Magic Kingdom changes? The changes that will most likely be direct copies of the very work done by her team?Kim was head of a Disneyland specific team. She wouldn’t have been all that involved in anything with the Magic Kingdom.
I think she was “a” Executive Creative Director, not “the”The Executive Creative Director of Walt Disney Imagineering
Good point, very important distinction.I think she was “a” Executive Creative Director, not “the”
There's your reason.especially considering this was done in a short timeframe with minimal downtime.
Florida's version of Constance has always looked superior to California's. Maybe because they never had to un-install it and re-install it for HMH. Also regarding scary, Wasn't the reason Connie was replaced because the implication of decapitation was too violent for modern sensibilities? Lets just say it is a miracle that the Ghost Host is still hanging. Again, I buy the structural excuse as much as I buy the sinkhole under Horizons. We all know the real reason $$$$$$.Getting the new bride would still also be a positive development as she is still infinitely better looking than Constance.
The interesting thing about Pirates is having the hyper-realistic animatronic of Johnny Depp's likeness does kind of blur the line between fantasy and reality that Pirates is literally built on.Pirates was so much better without the movie tying into it
Indeed, She was in the WDI team at Disneyland since the 1980s until her recent retirementI think she was “a” Executive Creative Director, not “the”
I'm judging Florida's Constance when I say it's terrible. I've never seen CA's Constance in person to know how bad it is.Florida's version of Constance has always looked superior to California's. Maybe because they never had to un-install it and re-install it for HMH.
Probably, but Constance's characterization doesn't create fear anyway. She is far too corny and poorly done to take her seriously, there's nothing scary about her. The new bride by comparison isn't scary either, but she at least has a more depressing somber aura about her that fits slightly better with what came before Constance. She doesn't embarrass me and take me out of the experience in a negative way like Constance did.Also regarding scary, Wasn't the reason Connie was replaced because the implication of decapitation was too violent for modern sensibilities?
Unfortunately i'll be surprised if the hangman lasts another 5 years, think it'll be gone within a decade. From Kim Irving's comments on the matter, it sounds like they had plans to replace it last refurb. But there were "complications" involved that stopped them. My guess is that they ran out of money. Kind of surprised they didn't just remove it outright with no replacement though given the situation. Funny thing is even in CA, I think removing it will incite some significant backlash.Lets just say it is a miracle that the Ghost Host is still hanging. Again, I buy the structural excuse as much as I buy the sinkhole under Horizons. We all know the real reason $$$$$$.
I still want to know the details about what was supposedly different about Florida's ride that was preventing them from just replicating the same exact scene from Disneyland. The story was that there were structural challenges that made it very cost prohibitive to expand the balcony and install the figure.
Infrastructure. It’s weird how that was stated so many times but people keep repeated “structural” instead.
My personal educated guess: blocks a fire escape.I just want to know what the problem allegedly was
Pirates was so much better without the movie tying into it
The interesting thing about Pirates is having the hyper-realistic animatronic of Johnny Depp's likeness does kind of blur the line between fantasy and reality that Pirates is literally built on.
You or someone else can correct me if i'm way off about this regarding how buildings work, but is that even a likely location for a fire escape? It's close to the center of the show building. Here's a layout of WDW's HM, and i've circled the place where Hattie would have gone in blue-My personal educated guess: blocks a fire escape.
Actually if you look at the original version of the scene. it is strongly implied that the Bride be-headed the Hatbox Ghost.I'm judging Florida's Constance when I say it's terrible. I've never seen CA's Constance in person to know how bad it is.
Probably, but Constance's characterization doesn't create fear anyway. She is far too corny and poorly done to take her seriously, there's nothing scary about her. The new bride by comparison isn't scary either, but she at least has a more depressing somber aura about her that fits slightly better with what came before Constance. She doesn't embarrass me and take me out of the experience in a negative way like Constance did.
Funny thing is that Constance is actually the ONLY bride in the ride's history that was explicitly portrayed as an evil killer. All previous brides before her were left ambiguous, you didn't know if they were good or evil. And despite this, many of them were unquestionably scary. The less you saw and heard of her, the more terrifying she was. She didn't need stupid dialog, she didn't need a weapon, just a candle and silence other than the glowing beating heart. The most terrifying were the ones with a completely dark void for a face and glowing eyes.
The original Haunted Mansion was smart about how it presented the themes of death as something morbidly scary, but without being overtly "violent" about it. It did so with subtlety and fear of the unknown. Even the hangman scene wasn't threatening so much as morbid and unsettling. It stimulates the fear of death rather than the fear of violence. Constance does the opposite, over the top unambiguously violence.
I can only go by descriptions of the scene, given that I doubt any of us saw it. But i'm not sure I 100% agree with the interpretation that the bride is implied to have killed him. Unless this has been confirmed to have been the intent from the people who created the ride.Actually if you look at the original version of the scene. it is strongly implied that the Bride be-headed the Hatbox Ghost.
I personally think HM is free from a full time IP invasion just due to the merch it pushes.A little off topic but this new pin they released concerns me. It's not the first time they have teased muppets at the mansion. I would not put it past them at this point to do a muppets square and muppets mansion at MK.
View attachment 877299
What was previously teased in such a way?A little off topic but this new pin they released concerns me. It's not the first time they have teased muppets at the mansion. I would not put it past them at this point to do a muppets square and muppets mansion at MK.
View attachment 877299
There were promotional videos awhile back of the muppets riding through the mansion etc, things like that.What was previously teased in such a way?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.