News Disney Lakeshore Lodge (Project 89 - Development near Fort Wilderness)

Haymarket2008

Well-Known Member
I know this isn't a thread about the Riviera, but the talk of it being a thematically successful resort is......objectively not correct.

It is a perfectly fine resort. The cafe in the lobby, Topolino's and Primo Piatto are all EXCELLENT. I will also commend the lovely themed library space next to the cafe as a major highlight.

Everything else, while nice, is thematically incoherent. And the French/Italian movie posters on the lower level are so tacky.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
Additional aerial photos by bioreconstruct - a new structure can been at the top of the first photo, along with what appears to be work beginning on the pool in the center:

View attachment 874624
View attachment 874621
I'm fairly sure the new structure mentioned is where the TSR will go, just a stones throw away from the pool area.

For the record - OKW is my favorite DVC resort. I absolutely love the vibe there. SSR is our first DVC home, and it took several years and many improvements for it to become "serviceable" for our family.

Back to Lakeshore Lodge now.
 

Chef idea Mickey`=

Well-Known Member
I will say the riviera is in a middle ground vs. the poly tower. It’s a step down as far as “disney feels” but the disney feel is still there a little. Poly tower? Not really.

RIV has definitely Disney touches from the music to the name inspirations found for The Petite Cafe or Topolino meaning Mickey in Italian. The library and hallway has vintage Walt Disney images of him vacationing with his wife/family. Poly Tower has none of that only a Moana splash statue and a hidden Mickey?
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
RIV has definitely Disney touches from the music to the name inspirations found for The Petite Cafe or Topolino meaning Mickey in Italian. The library and hallway has vintage Walt Disney images of him vacationing with his wife/family. Poly Tower has none of that only a Moana splash statue and a hidden Mickey?
But even with those little things it does have, it still fails to feel like a Disney Resort... I would argue that the Poly Tower, as egergious as it is, still has a tad more thematic touches overall...though I feel neither truly feelm like a Disney resort....and the Poly Tower is kind of a blight on the resort when it would not have been difficult to make it at least feel like the rest of the property.... Riviera is nice for a partner hotel... but absolutely does not feel like the Riviera or a classic Disney resort....I feel like Lakeshore Lodge is just the next installment of Disney forgetting what made the Disney resorts special.... but we will see....
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
RIV has definitely Disney touches from the music to the name inspirations found for The Petite Cafe or Topolino meaning Mickey in Italian. The library and hallway has vintage Walt Disney images of him vacationing with his wife/family. Poly Tower has none of that only a Moana splash statue and a hidden Mickey?
It’s this line of thinking that gets you to the conclusion that work done by Disneys isn’t “Disney.” The problem with Riviera and so many recent Disney projects is not a lack of references to things already known as “Disney”. Being Disney was a quality of design, not just slapping a picture of Mickey or Walt on a wall.
 

Horizons '83

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
While I know we will most likely never get another highly themed resort like the GF, WL or AK, I suspect that they will at some point need to differentiate themselves from said Marriot's and Hiltons to boost occupancy. Some of the recent promotions/discounts are very telling and I am curious to see what discounts are announced for Jan - Mar of 2026.

I am not sure how Lakeshore will be but my hope is that is somewhere between GF and Riviera thematically.
 

flyerjab

Well-Known Member
I have no issues with the new resorts. RIV is still my favorite. When it comes to the resorts I appreciate all of the deluxes. Each has their pluses and reasons for staying.

We just stayed at the Poly Tower for one night and loved it. It was the best duo room layout. The terrace garden rooms are BEAUTIFUL. And the lobby is gorgeous. We’ve already dined several times at that restaurant and every meal we’ve had was excellent. And coffee at the restaurant in the morning is…something…
IMG_5842.jpeg
IMG_5843.jpeg
IMG_5845.jpeg
IMG_5846.jpeg

We would stay here again in a heart beat. The theming at the resorts was never a priority to me. In the parks absolutely. And this time we tried something different. We stayed at Bonnet Creek the first night. Then we moved to the Poly tower. Bonnet Creek was nice but it couldn’t hold a candle to the Poly Tower or the RIV.
 
Last edited:

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
While I know we will most likely never get another highly themed resort like the GF, WL or AK, I suspect that they will at some point need to differentiate themselves from said Marriot's and Hiltons to boost occupancy. Some of the recent promotions/discounts are very telling and I am curious to see what discounts are announced for Jan - Mar of 2026.

I am not sure how Lakeshore will be but my hope is that is somewhere between GF and Riviera thematically.

To my mind the issue (and I say this as someone who loves Disney resorts) is the loss of perks without corresponding hotel upgrades. Riviera does offer things like a small gym and somewhat more luxe bathrooms, but nothing that’s going to blow peoples minds. In the meantime, the past five years have seen the loss of Magic Express, airline checkin, luggage delivery, much earlier FP booking windows, extra magic hours, room service (with limited exceptions)… I’m sure there are even more I’m forgetting.

I am kind of a traditionalist at Disney so to me staying at a Disney resort is just one of those things I want to do for its own sake, like a beloved tradition. For people who are looking to maximize the cost / rewards ratio on their trip, however, I really don’t know how much sense a Disney resort makes. Especially now that there are luxe resorts nearby offering all kinds of extras plus shuttles to the parks, in addition to the rise of Air B&B and such.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
I can't speak to the building quality - Saratoga is the only pre-Pop WDW resort I've never stayed in. Time shares, particularly in the coastal south, were traditionally associated with villas, and the DVC began with that logic. I've always found the timeshare hotel room idea Disney has moved to very odd - it seems to defeat much of the purpose. Of course, DVC really isn't a traditional "timeshare" now - if it ever was.

Indeed. I don’t think Disney is at fault here. The post OKW membership has strongly voted that they prioritize hotel rooms in convenient locations. Hence the first version of Poly, nothing but hotel rooms.

You asked an interesting question about if Disney hotels aren’t themed, what is the point? My long standing position is that Disney hotels have always been overrated as a function of price. Or that sometimes theme is leaned on too much to cover up functionally motels. I have the same opinion on DCL, while actually a premium mass-market family line, it’s very overrated for its price point.

I can simultaneously say Mira Costa is probably one of “Disney’s” best hotels and I think people who stay there are being foolish and swindled. For 300/400% less, the Bay Area hotels offer such better value.

Now I’ve softened with time. DVC is a back door into reducing hotel cash rates. Which helps with the calculus. But the point is likely Location, Quality, Transportation, Amenities, Theming and Perks. Maybe even in that order, for me. If there was a gondola running to the JW Marriott I’d probably pontificate about that one. IF the price was right.


As a small aside: what has attracted you so much to cash rooms but never DVC? Was that all historical when DVC was less of a hotel club and more of a condo one?
 

Chef idea Mickey`=

Well-Known Member
It’s this line of thinking that gets you to the conclusion that work done by Disneys isn’t “Disney.” The problem with Riviera and so many recent Disney projects is not a lack of references to things already known as “Disney”. Being Disney was a quality of design, not just slapping a picture of Mickey or Walt on a wall.

Yes, I know that. Apart from Poly Tower's location and views, the lobby feels cold and there isn't little nods to the OG Polynesian to make it relate it's name other than it's shared location. Riv is the same it's location and views, it's little touches adds more that I don't see Poly Tower standing out even if it's to some just slapped on it.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
Indeed. I don’t think Disney is at fault here. The post OKW membership has strongly voted that they prioritize hotel rooms in convenient locations. Hence the first version of Poly, nothing but hotel rooms.

You asked an interesting question about if Disney hotels aren’t themed, what is the point? My long standing position is that Disney hotels have always been overrated as a function of price. Or that sometimes theme is leaned on too much to cover up functionally motels. I have the same opinion on DCL, while actually a premium mass-market family line, it’s very overrated for its price point.

I can simultaneously say Mira Costa is probably one of “Disney’s” best hotels and I think people who stay there are being foolish and swindled. For 300/400% less, the Bay Area hotels offer such better value.

Now I’ve softened with time. DVC is a back door into reducing hotel cash rates. Which helps with the calculus. But the point is likely Location, Quality, Transportation, Amenities, Theming and Perks. Maybe even in that order, for me. If there was a gondola running to the JW Marriott I’d probably pontificate about that one. IF the price was right.


As a small aside: what has attracted you so much to cash rooms but never DVC? Was that all historical when DVC was less of a hotel club and more of a condo one?
There are a few answers to your question at the bottom. I always liked southern beach villas - if my family wasn't vacationing at WDW, we were likely vacationing at such a villa. That was an environment with a lot of timeshare pressure, and my family and I have always looked at timeshares in general as more or less a scam.

We did attend a DVC pitch meeting the first year they were offered - '92 I believe. We paid the premium to stay on property for two reasons - theming, and to be inside "the bubble." OKW was nice enough, but we didn't find the theming to be on the level of resorts like the Grand Floridian or Port Orleans. We also wanted the flexibility to try the cool new heavily-themed resorts Disney was building at an astounding rate back then.

The main reason, related to the first two, is that we didn't want to get locked into giving Disney money regardless of what they did, surrendering the only real leverage we had if they did things we didn't like. That was a good call, because around about the mid-2000s we began staying at Disney less and less and moved over to Universal, which had HHN and a very nice "bubble" and was steadily improving. Before this year I hadn't really stayed at a WDW resort in over a decade, although that's changing - Universal raised their hotel rates an INSANE amount this year and outside of EU they've lost quite a bit of their pre-covid spark. This is the first year in decades that I got an AP and that makes WDW rooms competitive with comparable Uni rooms, especially with that massive price hike. Even shifting back to Disney, however, I'm not tempted by DVC. I blame it for playing a significant role in killing the resort theming I loved.
 

Trueblood

Well-Known Member
The SFWMD permits show the location and spacing as well.

It looks like each building has ~33' to 40' of space between it and the next. If the post-it note I'm using to judge scale is accurate.

That's a little less than the distance between my house and my neighbor (in the suburbs). I'm a little surprised and delighted that it's that much.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom