Exactly! My kids are 4, 3, and baby, and unfortunately they are short like me. Weren't even tall enough for Alien Swirling Saucers last time... I'm seriously hoping they add at least one more ride with no height requirement some day. But by the time that would even open my kids would probably be in middle school and it wouldn't matter.
I always felt this was a miss though….. with so much space and so much money - there was room for a really cool transition that didn’t actually happen. :-/
I was really hoping to see some of Andy’s Star Wars Micro Machines.
It may have been designed for kids, but little kids can only ride TSM - which existed before Toy Story Land was thought of. Both new rides have a minimum height requirement. That’s just cruel given the theme.
Which is an issue for both monsters and cars expansions in other parks. It’s also an issue for the only attraction themed to Tiana.
What's the latest? Do we know what they're doing.
I mean mileage may vary here, but my niece rode Swirling Saucers at 20 months old, and she was average height for her age at that time. My 3.5 year old rode Slinky Dog and he is slightly above average height (67th percentile). I guess they could have put in no height requirement rides for babies/toddlers, but lets not act like the vast majority of kids can't ride these rides. My boys are 6 and 4 now and can ride everything in the park except Rock N Roller Coaster.
Agree with that...loved Berk as a land (was my favorite one)...Hiccups is definitely better than Slinky by a lot in my opinion...would take the other 2 Toy Story Rides over the ones in Berk. Show was meh for me, but at least it has one. Loved the spacing of the land, and the character interactions/walking around as well as the different dragon elements within the land.
I mean, they could add another ride to TSL, but they would need at least another 10 acres to do so
Is it something like this? blocking off the north side of the split path?