peter11435
Well-Known Member
I’m not basing my stance on Disney’s word. My information is not based on PR.
The point of mentioning the PR is to point out why the burden of proof here lies with you.
-
The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More -
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
DHS Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
The point of mentioning the PR is to point out why the burden of proof here lies with you.
I am not denying the PR though.
So the burden of evidence of anything more than that happening IS on you.
If you don't want to share that is fine.
How am I to prove there is nothing other than the PR?
peter11435
Well-Known Member
You’ve literally claimed in this thread that a theater show was not happening and that one was not announced. Both contradict the PR.
Your claim challenges existing public information thus the burden of proof is on you. I pointed out that what you had already claimed without proof was untrue. You seem to really want to ignore your burden here and pass it on to others that are challenging your own unproven claims.
the_rich
Well-Known Member
Well, first he said Disney hadn't announced anything. Then he changed it up once that was proved incorrect.
solidyne
Well-Known Member
Goalposts are moving for sure, but still.
So tell me we can all understand the difference between a Blue Sky announcement and hope, vs announcement of an actual attraction in design Right? We can argue semantics, and it does not change the fact.
If we just want to spin that into calling me a liar. Sure.
It just negates the truth of everything else.
If we just want to spin that into calling me a liar. Sure.
It just negates the truth of everything else.
the_rich
Well-Known Member
That right there makes me not believe them though. The other poster has had good info in the past.
I can tell the difference between concept art and nothing. It's one of my many skills as a rabbit.
Last edited:
The overlayed cell over Muppet's Courtyard concept art that executives wanted ready and approved for PR?
Not the same as WDI producers or entertainment producing a show.
Mainstreet Theater had great concept art too. As many things do.
As a fellow practicing person of prestidigitation, I know you also have the skill of knowing what misdirection and magician's choice is.
peter11435
Well-Known Member
Except this wasn’t a blue sky announcement and hope.
Nobody is trying to spin anything to call you a lier. However you have made statements in this thread that at best were misinformed or at worst were lies.
JustInTime
Well-Known Member
So weird. Thank you!!
The Leader of the Club
Well-Known Member
I’m sure we’ll hear something about the new show at Destination D23 in a few months. Disney won’t open a new land with a large empty building in front…especially if it used to house a fan-favorite attraction.
It also wouldn't be much of a land.
TheMaxRebo
Well-Known Member
All we have that is official is a story directly from Disney saying there would be a "New Theater Show" - they didn't have to include that and they definitely didn't have to include the word "new" but they wanted it out there that the intentions to develop a new show for the space
Is that actually developed? Who knows. Could they change their minds? Of course (heck, part of me would prefer putting in a dark ride there instead).
But unless something else official comes out or someone has explicit insider information saying definitely plans have changed, I don't know why we would start operating as if it won't happen
Is that actually developed? Who knows. Could they change their minds? Of course (heck, part of me would prefer putting in a dark ride there instead).
But unless something else official comes out or someone has explicit insider information saying definitely plans have changed, I don't know why we would start operating as if it won't happen
Agent H
Well-Known Member
I would be more surprised to learn that most people at imagineering don’t at least have a basic idea of every project that’s been greenlit by executives,
I miss Donnie saying EU was never going to be built. Fun times.
I get the fan favorite part, and not saying it will happen, but Disney is fine opening new lands in phases.
Thanks for an example of 'conspiracy theory.'
In order for this conspiracy theory to work just about, all those in PR, all those in WDI, all those in entertainment, and all those in managerial positions for the park have to know that Disney PR said there would be a show, but they all know there won't be a show. And not one of them will leak that lie.
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
They didn’t do their due diligence because they were in a panic about capacity. I they stupidly assumed that there wouldn’t be a mess of utilities and infrastructure under the parking lot.