MK Villains Land Announced for Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom

Bleed0range

Well-Known Member
“It is a mistake to not overextend themselves while most of the existing parks remaining underbuilt.”

‘Kay.

There is nothing they’re doing that is magically making the existing parks “better.” They’re just replacing existing stuff with new stuff.

And the parks are becoming sickeningly overcrowded.
 

Bleed0range

Well-Known Member
A 5th gate would make zero sense.

Is that your actual opinion or just a talking point you like to repeat. I’ve heard that, but I disagree. They take zero advantage of the land they have for any kind of expansions and the parks are so overcrowded that it’s making the experience worse and worse.
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
Is that your actual opinion or just a talking point you like to repeat. I’ve heard that, but I disagree. They take zero advantage of the land they have for any kind of expansions and the parks are so overcrowded that it’s making the experience worse and worse.
It’s an economic fact.

Some of their current and recent projects have been expansions, some have expanded capacity, some have increased utilization, and others have simply been replacements.

Building a fifth park won’t do anything to “magically make the existing parks better.” It will drastically increase costs and expenses and dilute revenue.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Disagree. It could solve the over crowding of the existing parks problem. But I’m also incredibly salty about ROA.
Overcrowding will persist. If it steals attendance, it will pull from non-MK gates, which are already the less overcrowded options.

Also, whether or not they currently replace more than they meaningfully expand is irrelevant to the discussion. Both suggestions (that they build a fifth gate vs. expanding at existing underbuilt gates using the same imagined pot of cash) are largely hypothetical, so why dig into the likelihood of one over the other? Your suggestion is massively MORE unlikely. It’s just about which as guests we’d prefer.
 

Bleed0range

Well-Known Member
Overcrowding will persist. If it steals attendance, it will pull from non-MK gates, which are already the less overcrowded options.

Also, whether or not they currently replace more than they meaningfully expand is irrelevant to the discussion. Both suggestions (that they build a fifth gate vs. expanding at existing underbuilt gates using the same imagined pot of cash) are largely hypothetical, so why dig into the likelihood of one over the other? Your suggestion is massively MORE unlikely. It’s just about which as guests we’d prefer.

On the flip side a truly great idea could revitalize the entire resort and attract more attendance and reassert Disney’s dominance after Epic Universe.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
On the flip side a truly great idea could revitalize the entire resort and attract more attendance and reassert Disney’s dominance after Epic Universe.
This presupposes it even needs to be reasserted. I’m not saying there won’t be a shift because I’m not a time traveler, but the park isn’t even open yet.
 

Bleed0range

Well-Known Member
I will yield that Disney should utilize some unused space first. Like Animation courtyard. But again, WHY on earth don’t they? It’s such a waste in the park.

My main gripe is they need to alleviate some of this overcrowding problem.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
My main gripe is they need to alleviate some of this overcrowding problem.
So build the Main Street arcades, expand the walkable area, create alternate viewing locations for the firework show (e.g. in Villains), etc. Overcrowding is much less severe in parks with infrastructure that better supports guest flow and accounts for multiple viewing locations for things like parades and nighttime spectaculars. MK is still built like a park meant to handle far fewer guests than it does today.
And I’m also so upset about ROA. I feel like everyone is just trying to convince themselves it’s not a terrible idea and accept it. But it’s a terrible idea.
Very few people are super happy about it, but it’s kind of unrelated. Expansion at MK does not necessitate the removal of the Rivers, this just happens to be how they’re going about it.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom