Universal Epic Universe (South Expansion Complex) - Now Open!

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Universal said they intend on building at least one new experience at each resort years ago when Comcast realized the potential of the parks business, but I don't think that goal is set in stone anymore. (I think it's just the fandom repeating old information). There was nothing of substance added to the resort in 2022 and nothing of significant investment (officially) for next year at UOR.

I will be monitoring Comcast's financials this year, but the park division itself is doing just fine at an operating income of 34% last year. And they just confirmed the intention of building a UK park... so Comcast will continue to feed the parks division. Like I mentioned earlier, UOR went through an explosive period of investment with multiple projects being worked on simultaneously in the 2010s. I expect a similar situation starting in August, with Rockit being the first project.

USH saw a 15% attendance increase (if you believe in the TEA attendance reports) after SNW opened there.

It is definitely a Comcast goal but it is hard to say how much it will stick. I do think we will see far more consistency like they have done since they came in. So far it is evident worldwide they are this way since 2013. So their plan as sole owners and investment promises have barely hit and the fruits worldwide subjectivity aside are evident.
 

MistaDee

Well-Known Member
(Let me know if I need to relocate this post)

Epic Universe is a fantastic park. Its major flaw is the lack of family-friendly attractions that can be experienced by the entire family that does not involve significant motion or getting wet. I'd prioritized a family-friendly dark ride at the park to help improve this aspect (either #1 or #7). I'd also try to fast-track some sort of minor addition to Dark Universe (#4 below) to add additional experiences within the land.

After experiencing the park, I don't think they need to touch the large expansion pads until the existing portals are fleshed out (and USF/IOA get significant investment)

View attachment 854792

This is really fantastic work, lots of creative ideas here. I'd like to parrot what @DrStarlander had suggested over on a Universal forum site: utilize that #6 plot for a family dark ride in the style of Secret Life of Pets or the Little Mermaid

They could go for an original ride based on the Celestial Park theme, or could choose an IP that might work within that realm like the Wild Robot or even the Lorax.

all images are their fine work:
1745446086933.png

1745446096294.png

1745446102570.png
 

DarkMetroid567

Well-Known Member
It’s just too short and looks really lackluster
It’s not bad, but it’s a terrible value for its capacity and eventual wait times. Each of my Orlando/TM friends that went during TM previews had nothing but negative things to say — likely because the wait was always >20 minutes. And if Epic isn’t totally dead like it is right now, it will always be over 20-30 minutes.
 

OrlandoRising

Well-Known Member
Epic Universe is a fantastic park. Its major flaw is the lack of family-friendly attractions that can be experienced by the entire family that does not involve significant motion or getting wet.

The thing they need to do is return a bit to the opening era, when they were better at broader appeal with their own take on shows and indoor attractions than they do now.
I get the logic behind posts like these, but Universal isn't trying to be like Disney. Their theme park brand is built on being a little more intense and thrilling and less "fun for the whole family" so as to not turn off older kids and teens. If they were going to change that brand in any significant way, we would've seen it happen with Epic, not after.
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
I get the logic behind posts like these, but Universal isn't trying to be like Disney. Their theme park brand is built on being a little more intense and thrilling and less "fun for the whole family" so as to not turn off older kids and teens. If they were going to change that brand in any significant way, we would've seen it happen with Epic, not after.
I don’t get why people think teenagers and older kids are turned off by Disney. The way I see it is that Michal Eisners son was one of the few people who thought that way (he was wrong) and now people think all teenagers feel that way about Disney?
 
Last edited:

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I get the logic behind posts like these, but Universal isn't trying to be like Disney. Their theme park brand is built on being a little more intense and thrilling and less "fun for the whole family" so as to not turn off older kids and teens. If they were going to change that brand in any significant way, we would've seen it happen with Epic, not after.
Well it did with Epic, just in a modern way where audiences are more comfortable with thrills. There is a good balance to start with and many of the thrills are 40 inch requirements and mild, but I think people are just saying what large attractions would be best next. All theme and amusement parks fill voids as they expand to be successful.

Universal since origins was never was Disney classic dark ride style and the original opening in 1990 did not even have many dark rides at all. The few it did were totally unique or.elements pf.trscked.rides
However, they were all incredibly accessible with 34 inch to 40 inch Height requirements max and not physically extreme.
It Also does not just mean themed coasters either. That us more or less what many and myself were alluding to. No one needs them to be like Disney. Just the best rounded version of Universal.
Uni did not have a single coaster until 1999 with Woody Woodpecker's Nuthouse Coaster and no ride at studios had a beyond 40 inch height requirement(many had none) until MIB in 2000 and ROTM with 48 in 2004. MGM had thrill rides of upper height requirements before Uni did.
You can say that Uni should not copy Disney but the association with major theme parks having dark rides that become more intense and thrilling can even to be said to be lead by Disney with Indy/CTX and Test Track etc...
 
Last edited:

Disgruntled Walt

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
I don’t get why people think teenagers and older kids are turned off by Disney. The way I see it is that was Michal Eisners son was one of the few people who thought that way (he was wrong) and now people think all teenagers think that way about Disney?
I don't think teenagers are turned off by Disney. Your presence (and others') disproves that.
 

Moth

Well-Known Member
It’s just too short and looks really lackluster
I think Nintendo just needs an extra attraction to really balance it out. Like, either for DK or Mario. Not Zelda (I want Zelda! But I mean, I want an extra Mario/DK ride to feed that crowd). If you get like, a water ride or something like a flat ride, you'd put pressure off of Yoshi so it can get the wait time it warrants, and can help DK in the process.

I'm sensitive and my heart strings are easily pulled, I think Yoshi is adorable and one of the few Nintendo characters I will happily shill money for (next to DK and Bowser), so I'm biased for Yoshi but I am definitely afraid of it hitting 60+ minutes consistently because SNW doesn't have a lot to do.
 

Andrew25

Well-Known Member
I get the logic behind posts like these, but Universal isn't trying to be like Disney. Their theme park brand is built on being a little more intense and thrilling and less "fun for the whole family" so as to not turn off older kids and teens. If they were going to change that brand in any significant way, we would've seen it happen with Epic, not after.
Universal needed an edge over Disney in the late 90s and early 2000s when they struggled as a business. Their business kept changing hands from different corporate overloads who didn't understand the parks business. They didn't get the proper financing for major additions, so they ended up having to create special events that catered to teens/young adults (HHN/Mardi Gras) because they had to carve a niche to survive.

Epic Universe, while I have my issues with it, does in fact change Universal's perception of what to offer at a theme park. There was a move to make less thrill rides, and more friendly options. (My post on adding more family-friendly offerings is to offer more non-motion base/wet attractions that the entire family from infant to senior can experience together).

And like someone mentioned above, the inclusion of family-friendly offerings does not deter teens/young adults from going. Adding Minion Land & DreamWorks to USF didn't deter the crowd from heading to Horror Nights.
 

hopemax

Well-Known Member
Rough start this morning. In line at Stardust Racers, but it hasn’t started operating yet. Neither has Donkey Kong. The app said Mario Kart would open at 10, but that is in delay too. So the only attractions open are Yoshi and the Carousel. At least we’re out of the sun in the queue. It’s going to be a hot one. We brought an umbrella for walking between the lands.

Oh! Just announced vehicles are moving. So hopefully not much longer.
 

hopemax

Well-Known Member
Finally got on Stardust (Yellow) at 10:48. Now in line at Monsters which is also delayed. At 11:10 over half the park was on dalay. With the only attractions operating being Carousel, Fyre Drill, Werewolf, Dragon Racers, and Mario Kart. Yoshi reopened so that makes 6.

This isn’t a complaint, but a statement that I’ve wondered if these previews aren’t better to explore first, ride later. But Monsters also has a “closing early sign.” So that’s the risk. Yesterday, following the wait times, things were a lot smoother.

Goal is to get on Monsters and hopefully hit the first Harry Potter show at 12:30 and get a Butterbeer crepe. Hopefully the afternoon will be better operationally.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom