That’s true. I was embellishing a bit. And that wasn’t only directed at you. The “fine” phenomenon has been going on for at least a year by many in the community. I guess I just don’t see the badge of honor in saying “I endorse mediocrity.” Especially when it’s packaged with the insinuation that we the fans are the problem. That those with strong reactions to these downgrades and mediocrity are just crazy fans who can’t be pleased. Thereby taking the onus off Disney.
So just for the record Tiana’s Bayou Adventure is fine, the Haunted Mansion shop is fine and POTC is not fine? I mean this is the hot take thread. So you re doing a good job. Lol.
Hard disagree on pirates and the haunted mansion store. But I do agree with you on Tiana’s Tomorrowland overall and especially galaxys edge.Yes, I’m as shocked as anybody. But Pirates does not deliver on what it is promising, whereas Tiana’s is and the Haunted Mansion shop is as well. Now it’s true that pirates is promising a whole lot more than the gift shop. And as an epic adventure traveling back in time and spanning many locations, it is probably promising a little more than Tiana‘s (which is promising more of a down-home musical romp with some wet thrills).
But, yeah. Those new additions are more satisfying and closer to their targets than Pirates is.
I have mixed opinions on Pixar pier. On one hand it’s hard to argue it isn’t more charming and themed than what was there before but on the other hand it represents them doing away with ever fully committing to the 1930s pier.Hottest and most controversial hot take:
Disneyland is better than DCA.
I'm sure I've really rocked your world with that one. It's gotten a lot better than it was back in 2001. And even though I could gripe about the Pixar Pier additions stripping away some of the charm they were able to give the place in 2012, that isn't my main problem.
It just isn't transportive enough. There are a few places like sitting at Flo's where you can look at the Cars rockwork where you can feel like you're somewhere else far away. Grizzly Peak area is pleasant, but the giant Grand Californian (as nice as it is) still puts the kibosh on feeling like you're in the real wilderness. And there's only, like 3 of those spots in DCA. Disneyland has hundreds of places like that.
Putting in the giant mountain range helps with sightlines - thank heavens I don't see the powerlines anymore - but I'm starting to feel that the problem has more to do with that promenade corridor. It's got pleasant things happening all around it now, but what is IT supposed to be? It still has that Six Flagsy "welcome to our amusement park" vibe, and what's the weenie to pull you along? Those tall pier attractions, which simply don't have any emotional power.
I don't think there's any real solving this. Pandora will need to be more than just another Carsland. It will need to be more like Galaxy's Edge in terms of a few distinct 'places' with in it. I don't think the backlot will be enough space to do it right, but I also think if they put Pandora in the DL Forward lot south of Pixar Hotel that might ...make the rest of DCA feel worse? I don't know. There's lots of good improvements here and there, there's plenty of 'clever gags' and things that Imagineering does well, but the whole has yet to become greater than the sum of its parts. We might just skip it next time and focus on DL and something else.
(And the pier is misery in the afternoon. No shade, nothing really happening in the water to look at, and ARG! can we cut the character audio from 75% of the Incredicoaster PLEASE! Let the music and the coaster do the talking, I don't need each character to repeat "Jack jack!" in my ears. It would be so much more satisfying if our imaginations filled in the blanks as we enjoy Giaccino's score.)
Hottest and most controversial hot take:
Disneyland is better than DCA.
I'm sure I've really rocked your world with that one. It's gotten a lot better than it was back in 2001. And even though I could gripe about the Pixar Pier additions stripping away some of the charm they were able to give the place in 2012, that isn't my main problem.
It just isn't transportive enough. There are a few places like sitting at Flo's where you can look at the Cars rockwork where you can feel like you're somewhere else far away. Grizzly Peak area is pleasant, but the giant Grand Californian (as nice as it is) still puts the kibosh on feeling like you're in the real wilderness. And there's only, like 3 of those spots in DCA. Disneyland has hundreds of places like that.
Putting in the giant mountain range helps with sightlines - thank heavens I don't see the powerlines anymore - but I'm starting to feel that the problem has more to do with that promenade corridor. It's got pleasant things happening all around it now, but what is IT supposed to be? It still has that Six Flagsy "welcome to our amusement park" vibe, and what's the weenie to pull you along? Those tall pier attractions, which simply don't have any emotional power.
Maybe if that long stretch were interrupted? Like if a big... something... intermediate weenie... like a Zorro's castle or a mountain were covering the promenade right after the Carsland entrance. So it would block the views of the pier, bringing your focus into what's closer in front of you, and then after you walk under it, the pier is unveiled...?
I don't think there's any real solving this. Pandora will need to be more than just another Carsland. It will need to be more like Galaxy's Edge in terms of a few distinct 'places' with in it. I don't think the backlot will be enough space to do it right, but I also think if they put Pandora in the DL Forward lot south of Pixar Hotel that might ...make the rest of DCA feel worse? I don't know. There's lots of good improvements here and there, there's plenty of 'clever gags' and things that Imagineering does well, but the whole has yet to become greater than the sum of its parts. We might just skip it next time and focus on DL and something else.
(And the pier is misery in the afternoon. No shade, nothing really happening in the water to look at, and ARG! can we cut the character audio from 75% of the Incredicoaster PLEASE! Let the music and the coaster do the talking, I don't need each character to repeat "Jack jack!" in my ears. It would be so much more satisfying if our imaginations filled in the blanks as we enjoy Giaccino's score.)
My hottest take from when I finally got to visit DL last year is Pinocchio's Daring Journey is a far, far superior dark ride than Snow White and Roger Rabbit and is slightly better than Alice... I'd put it ahead of Snow White, Roger Rabbit, and Alice, and just behind Peter Pan and Mr. Toad.
Pinocchio’s is very good, but you can’t beat Alice for the two levels, and of course Pan taps into primal joys no other ride does.My hottest take from when I finally got to visit DL last year is Pinocchio's Daring Journey is a far, far superior dark ride than Snow White and Roger Rabbit and is slightly better than Alice and the lack of attention it receives is really sad to see. I'd put it ahead of Snow White, Roger Rabbit, and Alice, and just behind Peter Pan and Mr. Toad.
Perhaps you didn't realize you stumbled into the Disneyland side of the forums because there hasn't been a CoP here for 51 years.I personally do not care for the carousel of progress. (Though I get it’s historical significance and want it to stick around.)
It’s a hot take, I’ll allow it!Perhaps you didn't realize you stumbled into the Disneyland side of the forums because there hasn't been a CoP here for 51 years.
Or am I missing something....
It's a good time!
it’s a small world takes place entirely in Hell.Mr. Toad trumps them all. What other Disneyland ride takes you to Hell?
False!I don’t have a lot of hot takes but one of them is that Hyperspace Mountain is better than regular Space Mountain at Disneyland. I won’t even say classic because that would have been the 1977 version with no music.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.