My apologies on you being angered on my post, my distain at Disney is not about the law, its in general. I should have attempted to say that in another thread.
I am sorry fgment, I re-read what I said and it appears that choice of words favor the states intent of the law itself- I don't, never have or will, It's wrong.
It's not what I meant. I believe both sides acted arrogantly (Disney in General-not its response to the law), instead of cooler...
Agree with you on everything you said.
What I attempted to articulate was Arrogance put Disney in its own dilemma. As I stated, the states retaliation is out of line. The state did what Disney has done for years leading up to this- Push their weight around.
Disney is not the victim; they are...
It is Disney's fault. Not because of who or what they want to champion, but due to the arrogance of thinking they can get away with anything-gouging, reducing or removing service, and more- Now the State's retaliation is out of line, but didn't the state do what Disney has done to others by...
I could care less who Disney likes or dislikes, if they want my vacation, movie, merchandise ETC dollars, my expectation is I will receive quality service in return. When the cost outweighs the quality, I am gone.
Disney has done a superb job at keeping themselves in a negative news posture.
Have not seen who is paying for these changes and if the "New" supervisors will be compensated and by whom. I guess the State will pay a lease on the building too?
Nothing has changed for me, I've said my peace, whether my opinion is right or wrong, I choose to vote with my closed wallet and go explore some new things.
Iger, Slappy and Dmaro are why we are here today. Did the pandemic hurt them? a little, but they also took advantage of the pandemic to offload things that cost Disney money.
Disney+ is a good product, I do question some of the new content created for D+, mainly Star Wars. But hey what do I...