Recent content by peter11435

That was not used for lay down. The area across World Drive was used for water management and the dirt was used as fill on the Galaxies Edge site. That areas served and continues to serve its intended purpose.

These decisions happen well above park VP level. Sarah wasn’t even at MK when this decision was made.

Random imagineers always toy with a variety of ideas. The company however (park leadership) was never looking for a plan that kept the river.

It’s not up to the WDI management team. WDI isn’t afraid of original ideas. But they are not the ones that decide what gets designed and built.

I’m referring to overall construction timelines. There’s plenty of examples to prove my point. Based on many of your prior arguments I’m more than well aware that your sources lack the knowledge and understanding you seem to think they process. But if you look at the dates you just typed...

I was referring the attractions 3 year construction timeline being half of 6 years. There you go with more arbitrary timelines. WDW was announced in 1965 and groundbreaking took place in 1967. Over 4 years before the property would open. You’re conveniently ignoring the years of planning and...

Do you not understand what I’m referring to or are you just intentionally trying to act confused. Actual development timelines between Disney and Universal are not materially different. Announcing a project early in design phase is going to seem much different than announcing one ready to start...

That’s probably the least fair comparison because projects are not announced at the same point in the development phase. But you already know that and are simply using that to prove a point you’re fabricating.

I had no idea that a decade was less than 6 years. How many rides have you developed and built? This is not an unusual time line.

This is exactly how it should be done.

Highly unlikely animal care is going anywhere. The guest visible portions of animal care at CS are a fraction of the animal programs and veterinary facilities located in and around the building. It is critical to the function of the park and I don’t seen them relocating for this.

A lot of people here like to deny truth and reality.

Not exactly. And what’s your point? You can clearly see that some of these slabs are still in place such as along the HM queue canopy and in front of the old Keelboat dock. Regardless nothing has been filled in. The ground level you see in these photos is the level of the river bottom.

Nothing has been filled in. You are looking at what is essentially the bottom of the former river bed. You can clearly see the sloping sides of the riverbed along the top and the seawalls still in place down to the riverbed around the former riverboat dock.

I’ll avoid taking this down a route that will get unavoidably political and simply point out that there is no way Kimmels contract was extended without Igers involvement and approval.