People keep replying because you keep making erroneous claims about what can and has been done. If you want to just say you don’t care, then fine, say that. Don’t thought try to wrap it up as statements of “reality” because people will absolutely continue to point out what actually exists.
I agree with that. Meanwhile, as I said, many people like Disney Parks for the theming and vibes.
I'm having a hard time reconciling the 'common guests don't care' line of thought with the extraordinary cost and effort Disney frequently spends to hide show buildings. If it matters sometimes, why not all the time?
I agree, for most people, the attractions are the draw. But that's like saying "the draw" of a restaurant is the food. Most would agree with that. But if the carpet smells and you can see the dirty mop sink in the kitchen, and dust on the ducting overhead, these things that most guests wouldn't have thought of in advance, wouldn't have been on their mind when thinking about choosing a restaurant for dinner, suddenly become a reason they no longer find the particular restaurant as appealing.
Really? I'm less worried on basically every other current project at WDW. Tropical Americas, Piston Peak, and Villains probably won't have sightline issues at all, whereas there are two major causes for concern in Monstropolis based first on the physical model they presented for the coaster and second on the art that currently shows no mitigation for obvious issues that will arise if the courtyard is executed as indicated. That doesn't mean that they won't make adjustments to address concerns, particularly since they had to move the attraction building back farther than planned; however, there are more legitimate reasons to be concerned here than elsewhere.
Yep the goal posts will be moved to something else they don’t like.
Is there that much mystery about this?
Uh, why would you think it would look like anything other than the physical model of the actual attraction, shown in the posts directly above yours?
Depends on when the model was created.
The current footprint of the building is almost exactly what the model indicates. I would not expect it to deviate significantly. Originally, I think they were banking on the narrower walkway flanked by buildings to limit your ability to see the warehouse on approach. However, now that the show building is farther back, the new art shows an open courtyard that clearly won't hide things very well if built as proposed. My hope is that the new art was slapped together when the decision to move it back happened and that sightlines will be smoothed out by other means that were as yet unplanned, but we'll see.
The art also doesn’t show the gravity building that you can make out in the model. That should be easier to theme I would think but the fact isn’t it in the art just means the art is more half baked.
Haha, indeed, the Berk blue box is not being spared attention...here exploring concealing the edges with posts...
That would require a structure not on the plans. In an area where they aren’t doing any work.
I also believe that art was generic and didn’t tie into a defined space
Because you’re a normal human being not expecting Disney to fix views hundreds of feet in the air from the Skyliner.