Disney Irish
Premium Member
I had seen rumors about this movie for awhile, so not sure why you're posting it.
The deal is done as far as WBD and N are concerned. Offer accepted. Many previous meetings. Contractual obligations are now in place while approval is pending requiring WBD to continue as is, with limits on spending for new projects.Typically they should have visited BEFORE they agreed to acquire the Studio, not after. Given that press was there this is yet another PR spin to make it look like they have it in the bag. And maybe they do, but after the acquisition process begins you typically don't have CEOs doing a site visit as you want to keep the impression of impropriety out of the situation, ie they have to continue to be run separately until the acquisition is completed, you don't want it looking like Ted there is trying to make decisions before they fully have the Studio. For example Iger didn't visit the 20th Century lot during the acquisition phase, and certainly didn't do it until AFTER the 21st Century shareholders approved the merger and it passed regulatory. In fact I can't remember any CEO of any recent merger doing a site visit prior to it closing, but I could be misremembering.
As I said I can't remember any other CEO of the acquiring company doing a site visit like this prior to close, its typically done after the close once its in the acquisition process. Not saying its nefarious or some breach in protocol, just saying its not typical as it should have been done prior to entering into the acquisition process.The deal is done as far as WBD and N are concerned. Offer accepted. Many previous meetings. Contractual obligations are now in place while approval is pending requiring WBD to continue as is, with limits on spending for new projects.
The doesn't seem odd, nefarious, or a breach in protocol to me.
I have a feeling its not going to pass the regulatory process, especially in the EU.Hopefully the Netflix acquisition is stopped. It would be terrible for the industry and for movie theaters.
Looks like our Canadian members may have some issues with content if this is finalized, say bye bye to Crave and prepare to pony up for Netflix if you still want that same content -
![]()
Opinion: A Netflix deal for Warner means curtains for Crave unless Canadian regulators step in
Acquiring HBO assets would hollow out the offerings on Canadian streamerwww.theglobeandmail.com
The die appears to be cast there regardlessHopefully the Netflix acquisition is stopped. It would be terrible for the industry and for movie theaters.
Hey @coffeefan, this is part of the overall deal that WB signed with Tom Cruise last year -
![]()
Warner Bros. Motion Picture Group And Tom Cruise To Jointly Develop And Produce Original And Franchise Theatrical Films Starring Cruise Beginning In 2024 Under Newly Formed Strategic Partnership - Warner Bros. Discovery
Warner Bros. Discovery, a premier global media and entertainment company, offers audiences the world's most differentiated and complete portfolio of content, brands and franchises across television, film, streaming and gaming. The new company combines WarnerMedia's premium entertainment, sports...www.wbd.com
Has nothing to do with this Netflix acquisition or proof they will be releasing movies in the future, as I assume is why you posted it.
Certainly doesn't look good that is for sure.A nightmare scenario. The death of the Canadian content crave creates.
Not at all, I was just making the point if that was what you were getting at by posting it.That post had nothing to do with Netflix. I always post trailers or news of movies that interest me.
I think you're spiraling.![]()
Looks like our Canadian members may have some issues with content if this is finalized, say bye bye to Crave and prepare to pony up for Netflix if you still want that same content -
![]()
Opinion: A Netflix deal for Warner means curtains for Crave unless Canadian regulators step in
Acquiring HBO assets would hollow out the offerings on Canadian streamerwww.theglobeandmail.com
If the bundle became mandatory, then that indicates it didn't think it could survive without it. You don't do something as mandatory if it was just "better". And given that HBO is Crave's primary content supplier and why a majority of its subscribers are there, if Netflix removes that content the service becomes a hollow version of itself meaning its days are numbered, ie large subscriber loss.Crave still has a deal for HBO content for a few years if I'm not mistaken.
Crave started as a standalone for $10 or so monthly with HBO as an optional add-on for a total of $20 or so. At some point the bundle became mandatory.
Clearly, HBO being mandatory was seen as beneficial for Crave, but it's unknown if they lack the ability to survive without it.
So this would be a negative blow against Crave, but it doesn't automatically mean the service would die. That's the question, is the mandatory bundle necessary for Crave, or just better?
If the bundle became mandatory, then that indicates it didn't think it could survive without it. You don't do something as mandatory if it was just "better". And given that HBO is Crave's primary content supplier and why a majority of its subscribers are there, if Netflix removes that content the service becomes a hollow version of itself meaning its days are numbered, ie large subscriber loss.
Also the exact terms of the extension from last year is unknown, by the time this closes in 2026/2027 that extension might be expired.
Completely different scenario as you're talking about two streamers under the same company with D+ and Hulu merging, ie they didn't remove any content as part of that. The same content is still available in the merged service, and technically still available in Hulu until the service is shuttered completely. That isn't what is happening here with Crave.Not necessarily.
Disney+ is merging with Hulu to be more cost effective and increase revenue, but it doesn't mean Disney+ was not going to survive otherwise.
The same is true here.
Completely different scenario as you're talking about two streamers under the same company with D+ and Hulu merging, ie they didn't remove any content as part of that. The same content is still available in the merged service, and technically still available in Hulu until the service is shuttered completely. That isn't what is happening here with Crave.
Crave used to also have Paramount content, but when Paramount+ was launch Paramount removed all their content. The reason it survived is because of the exclusivity deal with WB for HBO content, ie only place to get HBO content in Canada. The idea that they can survive without any the partnered content when Netflix removes HBO content is pretty flimsy at best, as what would they have left? Some local CBC shows and thats it? Why pay for a streamer to get the same content you can already get elsewhere in Canada? The whole reason to get Crave was the licensed content from US streamers like HBO, if that is gone its pretty worthless as a streamer, which is the whole point of the author of the article.
Which means is not only Netflix taking out the 4th largest streaming in the world by eventually merging and removing HBO, but also the #1 largest Canadian owned streaming service.and it would likely be a nail in the coffin for Drag Race Canada, and other Crave Originals.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.