• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Disney Irish

Premium Member

Hey @coffeefan, this is part of the overall deal that WB signed with Tom Cruise last year -


Has nothing to do with this Netflix acquisition or proof they will be releasing movies in the future, as I assume is why you posted it.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Typically they should have visited BEFORE they agreed to acquire the Studio, not after. Given that press was there this is yet another PR spin to make it look like they have it in the bag. And maybe they do, but after the acquisition process begins you typically don't have CEOs doing a site visit as you want to keep the impression of impropriety out of the situation, ie they have to continue to be run separately until the acquisition is completed, you don't want it looking like Ted there is trying to make decisions before they fully have the Studio. For example Iger didn't visit the 20th Century lot during the acquisition phase, and certainly didn't do it until AFTER the 21st Century shareholders approved the merger and it passed regulatory. In fact I can't remember any CEO of any recent merger doing a site visit prior to it closing, but I could be misremembering.
The deal is done as far as WBD and N are concerned. Offer accepted. Many previous meetings. Contractual obligations are now in place while approval is pending requiring WBD to continue as is, with limits on spending for new projects.

The doesn't seem odd, nefarious, or a breach in protocol to me.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
The deal is done as far as WBD and N are concerned. Offer accepted. Many previous meetings. Contractual obligations are now in place while approval is pending requiring WBD to continue as is, with limits on spending for new projects.

The doesn't seem odd, nefarious, or a breach in protocol to me.
As I said I can't remember any other CEO of the acquiring company doing a site visit like this prior to close, its typically done after the close once its in the acquisition process. Not saying its nefarious or some breach in protocol, just saying its not typical as it should have been done prior to entering into the acquisition process.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
So this is why it was rushed, Zaslav didn't want to lose his golden goose -


So didn't matter if any other bidder wasn't done bidding, it was "either sign now or we walk".
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
Original Poster

coffeefan

Well-Known Member
Hey @coffeefan, this is part of the overall deal that WB signed with Tom Cruise last year -


Has nothing to do with this Netflix acquisition or proof they will be releasing movies in the future, as I assume is why you posted it.

That post had nothing to do with Netflix. I always post trailers or news of movies that interest me.

I think you're spiraling. 🧐
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
That post had nothing to do with Netflix. I always post trailers or news of movies that interest me.

I think you're spiraling. 🧐
Not at all, I was just making the point if that was what you were getting at by posting it.

I have my opinion on the Netflix thing, I still think there is a strong possibility it doesn't go through, but have come to terms if it does.
 

Wendy Pleakley

Well-Known Member
Looks like our Canadian members may have some issues with content if this is finalized, say bye bye to Crave and prepare to pony up for Netflix if you still want that same content -


Crave still has a deal for HBO content for a few years if I'm not mistaken.

Crave started as a standalone for $10 or so monthly with HBO as an optional add-on for a total of $20 or so. At some point the bundle became mandatory.

Clearly, HBO being mandatory was seen as beneficial for Crave, but it's unknown if they lack the ability to survive without it.

So this would be a negative blow against Crave, but it doesn't automatically mean the service would die. That's the question, is the mandatory bundle necessary for Crave, or just better?
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Crave still has a deal for HBO content for a few years if I'm not mistaken.

Crave started as a standalone for $10 or so monthly with HBO as an optional add-on for a total of $20 or so. At some point the bundle became mandatory.

Clearly, HBO being mandatory was seen as beneficial for Crave, but it's unknown if they lack the ability to survive without it.

So this would be a negative blow against Crave, but it doesn't automatically mean the service would die. That's the question, is the mandatory bundle necessary for Crave, or just better?
If the bundle became mandatory, then that indicates it didn't think it could survive without it. You don't do something as mandatory if it was just "better". And given that HBO is Crave's primary content supplier and why a majority of its subscribers are there, if Netflix removes that content the service becomes a hollow version of itself meaning its days are numbered, ie large subscriber loss.

Also the exact terms of the extension from last year is unknown, by the time this closes in 2026/2027 that extension might be expired.
 

Wendy Pleakley

Well-Known Member
If the bundle became mandatory, then that indicates it didn't think it could survive without it. You don't do something as mandatory if it was just "better". And given that HBO is Crave's primary content supplier and why a majority of its subscribers are there, if Netflix removes that content the service becomes a hollow version of itself meaning its days are numbered, ie large subscriber loss.

Also the exact terms of the extension from last year is unknown, by the time this closes in 2026/2027 that extension might be expired.

Not necessarily.

Disney+ is merging with Hulu to be more cost effective and increase revenue, but it doesn't mean Disney+ was not going to survive otherwise.

The same is true here.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Not necessarily.

Disney+ is merging with Hulu to be more cost effective and increase revenue, but it doesn't mean Disney+ was not going to survive otherwise.

The same is true here.
Completely different scenario as you're talking about two streamers under the same company with D+ and Hulu merging, ie they didn't remove any content as part of that. The same content is still available in the merged service, and technically still available in Hulu until the service is shuttered completely. That isn't what is happening here with Crave.

Crave used to also have Paramount content, but when Paramount+ was launch Paramount removed all their content. The reason it survived is because of the exclusivity deal with WB for HBO content, ie only place to get HBO content in Canada. The idea that they can survive without any the partnered content when Netflix removes HBO content is pretty flimsy at best, as what would they have left? Some local CBC shows and thats it? Why pay for a streamer to get the same content you can already get elsewhere in Canada? The whole reason to get Crave was the licensed content from US streamers like HBO, if that is gone its pretty worthless as a streamer, which is the whole point of the author of the article.
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Completely different scenario as you're talking about two streamers under the same company with D+ and Hulu merging, ie they didn't remove any content as part of that. The same content is still available in the merged service, and technically still available in Hulu until the service is shuttered completely. That isn't what is happening here with Crave.

Crave used to also have Paramount content, but when Paramount+ was launch Paramount removed all their content. The reason it survived is because of the exclusivity deal with WB for HBO content, ie only place to get HBO content in Canada. The idea that they can survive without any the partnered content when Netflix removes HBO content is pretty flimsy at best, as what would they have left? Some local CBC shows and thats it? Why pay for a streamer to get the same content you can already get elsewhere in Canada? The whole reason to get Crave was the licensed content from US streamers like HBO, if that is gone its pretty worthless as a streamer, which is the whole point of the author of the article.

and it would likely be a nail in the coffin for Drag Race Canada, and other Crave Originals.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom