News Disney’s Boy Trouble: Studio Seeks Original IP to Win Back Gen-Z Men Amid Marvel, Lucasfilm Struggles

brb1006

Well-Known Member
The second thing is Disney has to let a franchise for boys be a franchise for boys. I understand you want inclusivity, but girls have a myriad of franchises at Disney, they will be ok. The first thing Disney does when they get their hands on a successful male franchise is start trying to gear it for girls. I dont understand it. Is it something innate in the company? This isnt something new either, they tried and failed to do the same thing with the Cars franchise. Its so bad they not only screwed the pooch with the Star Wars movies, but that line of thought led them to create a Star Wars land in numerous parks where their most popular male characters cannot appear due to the "story". Everyone over there should have been let go before that was even greenlit.
The only Disney IP (Star Wars, Marvel, and Pixar doesn't count) that actually lets a franchise for boys to be aimed at boys is The Lion King. Before the live-action remake, The Lion King was one of the few Disney Animated Films during the Renaissance era that young boys weren't ashamed to admit at loving. Especially since Timon and Pumba became the film's breakout characters alongside being one of the first Disney characters to use fart jokes that audiences actually found funny. They were so popular that Timon and Pumba gained a spinoff TV series not long after the film's success.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
I find it sad that it took until page 2 for someone to finally make this point. Ignoring the elephant in the room much?

And whatever appeal those franchises have to boys would be “fixed” shortly after Disney got their hands on it. The way to fix their “boy problem” is simple: fire everyone that thinks what they did overall with LucasFilm and Marvel was good. There were a few successes but the whole of it looking back was way more bad than good though with Marvel the issues only really started after Endgame.
Andor Season 1, Season 2 and Rogue One are a better “trilogy” than the original trilogy, in my opinion. It’s an incredible accomplishment for which the company gets too little credit. Skeleton Crew was excellent. Mandalorian was great. Episodes 7-9 were mediocre. Honestly, while the whole of the record is imperfect, I think Lucasfilm’s record is much better than a lot of other studios. I do think Kathleen Kennedy should step away from her role as president and go back to what she was good at: producing. While she’s been president, Lucasfilm has canned too many projects and too many have been mismanaged.

Between Thunderbolts, Daredevil, and Fantastic Four, Marvel is back on track. After seeing F4, I couldn’t be more pumped for Doomsday.

By the way, I’m a Gen Z male. And my fellow Gen Z male co-workers feel the same way.
 
Last edited:

Mortimer Mouse

New Member
To be fair the concept of what men want vs what women want is not really a legitimate argument these days seeing as how a lot of younger people have moved on beyond the concept of "gender roles"

It doesn't have to do with gender roles, it has to do with kids recognizing themselves on screen. Little boys desire male heroes/protagonists. If Disney wants to capture more male demo, then they're going to have to start focusing on developing new male protagonists and centering simple but engaging stories around them (think Mandalorian).
 
Last edited:

Alice a

Well-Known Member
Ok, I’m a woman and some of the comments in this thread are bordering on offensive. Quality content appeals across the board to female and male audiences.

The Star Wars sequels were bad because they weren’t well-written or creative or even cohesive; the worst Marvel stuff clearly was churned out without care or love of the product.

This has nothing to do with who the content is aimed at. Yes, more men like Red Dawn than women; I’m not saying there isn’t male/female centric content.

But to blame failures on trying to appeal to women is ridiculous.

The last 2 Indiana Jones flops have nothing to do with trying to appeal to women- a Lucasfilm franchise, I might add, that historically succeeded because it appealed to multiple demographics.

Plenty of girls/women loved the original Star Wars movies. They have universal appeal.

And are we honestly saying the Lion King is a boy movie? Because I was in middle school when the original came out, and all of my friends and I were obsessed. It’s Hamlet.

The mandate from above to churn stuff out en masse, per some algorithm they think promises success, has affected the Disney company across the board- we’ve all seen it at the parks.

The problem here is the reduction of quality (at great expense), in the prioritization of flashy emptiness over meaningful depth, and this is a direct result of creatives losing their power at the company.

This is what you should be attacking: that imagineers and filmmakers with talent are being marginalized, while cardboard CEOs like Iger, and non-creative backgrounds like Kennedy, are running things.

When true creatives are given the chance to run with it, rides like Tower of Terror and content like Andor is produced.

When they’re not, you get Toy Story Land and Secret Invasion.
 
Last edited:

Mike S

Well-Known Member
Andor Season 1, Season 2 and Rogue One are a better “trilogy” than the original trilogy, in my opinion. It’s an incredible accomplishment for which the company gets too little credit. Skeleton Crew was excellent. Mandalorian was great. Episodes 7-9 were mediocre. Honestly, while the whole of the record is imperfect, I think Lucasfilm’s record is much better than a lot of other studios. I do think Kathleen Kennedy should step away from her role as president and go back to what she was good at: producing. While she’s been president, Lucasfilm has canned too many projects and too many have been mismanaged.
Those were creative successes but the sequels were what actually mattered and beyond Mandalorian most people were too burned to care about Disney+ Star Wars as proven by the numbers.
Between Thunderbolts, Daredevil, and Fantastic Four, Marvel is back on track. After seeing F4, I couldn’t be more pumped for Doomsday.


By the way, I’m a Gen Z male. And my fellow Gen Z male co-workers feel the same way.
I wouldn’t know as I’ve become completely apathetic to the series and looking at the numbers I’m far from alone.
Ok, I’m a woman and some of the comments in this thread are bordering on offensive. Quality content appeals across the board to female and male audiences.

The Star Wars sequels were bad because they weren’t well-written or creative or even cohesive; the worst Marvel stuff clearly was churned out without care or love of the product.

This has nothing to do with who the content is aimed at. Yes, more men like Red Dawn than women; I’m not saying there isn’t male/female centric content.

But to blame failures on trying to appeal to women is ridiculous.

The last 2 Indiana Jones flops have nothing to do with trying to appeal to women- a Lucasfilm franchise, I might add, that historically succeeded because it appealed to multiple demographics.

Plenty of girls/women loved the original Star Wars movies. They have universal appeal.

And are we honestly saying the Lion King is a boy movie? Because I was in middle school when the original came out, and all of my friends and I were obsessed. It’s Hamlet.

The mandate from above to churn stuff out en masse, per some algorithm they think promises success, has affected the Disney company across the board- we’ve all seen it at the parks.

The problem here is the reduction of quality (at great expense), in the prioritization of flashy emptiness over meaningful depth, and this is a direct result of creatives losing their power at the company.

This is what you should be attacking: that imagineers and filmmakers with talent are being marginalized, while cardboard CEOs like Iger, and non-creative backgrounds like Kennedy, are running things.

When true creatives are given the chance to run with it, rides like Tower of Terror and content like Andor is produced.

When they’re not, you get Toy Story Land and Secret Invasion.
There’s nothing wrong with female fans simply existing for these franchises. The problem comes when clueless executives fundamentally change things to attract more of them thinking everyone who was already on board will stay as well “just because.”

Everyone loved Iron Man vs. practically no one giving a 💩 about Iron Heart, especially the people they were so desperate to attract. Another good example is The Marvels. You’d think women would love to see a female superhero team up right? Nope. They preferred Barbie, and out of the small amount of people that went to see The Marvels the audience was still mostly male. Superhero movies like Marvel and Space Operas like Star Wars will always heavily skew towards a male audience no matter what anyone tries to tell you. Appeal to them first and if your product is good enough it will expand outwards naturally from there.

If I haven’t made it clear I have nothing against female fans of things I like. I welcome it wholeheartedly. The problem I have is with clueless execs changing things to stupidly try to attract a “wider demographic” and ignoring reality.
 

Alice a

Well-Known Member
Those were creative successes but the sequels were what actually mattered and beyond Mandalorian most people were too burned to care about Disney+ Star Wars as proven by the numbers.

I wouldn’t know as I’ve become completely apathetic to the series and looking at the numbers I’m far from alone.

There’s nothing wrong with female fans simply existing for these franchises. The problem comes when clueless executives fundamentally change things to attract more of them thinking everyone who was already on board will stay as well “just because.”

Everyone loved Iron Man vs. practically no one giving a 💩 about Iron Heart, especially the people they were so desperate to attract. Another good example is The Marvels. You’d think women would love to see a female superhero team up right? Nope. They preferred Barbie, and out of the small amount of people that went to see The Marvels the audience was still mostly male. Superhero movies like Marvel and Space Operas like Star Wars will always heavily skew towards a male audience no matter what anyone tries to tell you. Appeal to them first and if your product is good enough it will expand outwards naturally from there.

If I haven’t made it clear I have nothing against female fans of things I like. I welcome it wholeheartedly. The problem I have is with clueless execs changing things to stupidly try to attract a “wider demographic” and ignoring reality.
I understand and agree with quite a bit of what you’re saying, but it’s even worse that these executives are thinking that, by featuring storylines with ridiculously Mary-Sue-esque, flawless female characters (Rey) but not doing any heavy lifting with plot or character development, they think dumb women will spend buckets of money on this schlock, and the boys will come just for the name ‘Star Wars’ or ‘Marvel’ and big explosions.

That clearly hasn’t worked, over and over again, and yet they keep on insulting all of us with it.

Just give me new, thoughtful content in a universe I know, and I’m happy.
 

Mike S

Well-Known Member
I understand and agree with quite a bit of what you’re saying, but it’s even worse that these executives are thinking that, by featuring storylines with ridiculously Mary-Sue-esque, flawless female characters (Rey) but not doing any heavy lifting with plot or character development, they think dumb women will spend buckets of money on this schlock, and the boys will come just for the name ‘Star Wars’ or ‘Marvel’ and big explosions.

That clearly hasn’t worked, over and over again, and yet they keep on insulting all of us with it.

Just give me new, thoughtful content in a universe I know, and I’m happy.
The biggest slap to the face for me is how this same company is able to get Alien and Predator of all things completely right but can’t figure out Star Wars. For a family friendly company you’d think it would be the opposite!!! 🤣
 

Smugpugmug

Well-Known Member
The mandate from above to churn stuff out en masse, per some algorithm they think promises success, has affected the Disney company across the board- we’ve all seen it at the parks.

The problem here is the reduction of quality (at great expense), in the prioritization of flashy emptiness over meaningful depth, and this is a direct result of creatives losing their power at the company.

This is what you should be attacking: that imagineers and filmmakers with talent are being marginalized, while cardboard CEOs like Iger, and non-creative backgrounds like Kennedy, are running things.

When true creatives are given the chance to run with it, rides like Tower of Terror and content like Andor is produced.
Yeah definitely agree about some of the comments on here and it's why I'm mostly a lurker.

But the quoted part of your post is how I feel and how many of my Gen Z peers feel as well. We can tell that a lot of the content is sloppily made with 0 care. We don't care who specifically it's marketed to.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
The biggest slap to the face for me is how this same company is able to get Alien and Predator of all things completely right but can’t figure out Star Wars. For a family friendly company you’d think it would be the opposite!!! 🤣
I haven’t watched Romulus but I put it in the same category as the recent Predator films: put them in the hands of a competent/good director and give them a modest budget. Since they are not conventional tentpoles there is less expectations/riding on them, so it gives them the freedom to lean into core aspects of the franchise and not be a four-quadrant phenomenon.

In terms of Alien, Noah Hawley is an exceptional show runner, writer, and director, and they likewise gave him the latitude to make a series that evoked the Ridley Scott original as well as Scott’s Blade Runner.

In terms of SW and MCU, I get the feeling they felt those franchises were too big to fail, and since they were cultural hegemons they felt an obligation to work out social causes and gender issues, thinking, well, where else is our core audience going to go if they don’t like it - they’ll eat up and slop with a Star Wars or Marvel name on it.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
Those were creative successes but the sequels were what actually mattered and beyond Mandalorian most people were too burned to care about Disney+ Star Wars as proven by the numbers.
So you admit that Disney has created great Star Wars content? Frankly, better Star Wars content than George Lucas has made in over 40 years and maybe ever.
The biggest slap to the face for me is how this same company is able to get Alien and Predator of all things completely right but can’t figure out Star Wars.
They just made Skeleton Crew and Andor, some of the best Star Wars content ever made. As I mentioned, I personally think Andor and Rogue One are a better trilogy than the original trilogy. Why should that not matter? Just because the sequels were mediocre doesn’t mean Lucasfilm hasn’t “figured out” Star Wars.
I wouldn’t know as I’ve become completely apathetic to the series and looking at the numbers I’m far from alone.
Absolutely nothing is stopping you from picking things up again. I have never seen Ant-Man 3, The Marvels, or She-Hulk. Deadpool and Wolverine did over $1 billion at the box office despite being rated R in part because people were excited about Deadpool joining Disney’s MCU. I will be shocked if Avengers: Doomsday doesn’t do very well at the box office and restart a broader excitement about the MCU.
 

Mike S

Well-Known Member
So you admit that Disney has created great Star Wars content?

They just made Skeleton Crew and Andor, some of the best Star Wars content ever made. As I mentioned, I think Andor and Rogue One are a better trilogy than the original trilogy. Why should that not matter? Just because the sequels were mediocre doesn’t mean Lucasfilm hasn’t “figured out” Star Wars.
I admitted this since the start by saying there was more bad than good implying there was good mixed in. My initial post was also talking about LucasFilm as a whole referring to the utter failures of Indiana Jones and Willow. As enjoyable as Andor and Skeleton Crew were it doesn’t change that their numbers were far from impressive which it doesn’t take much to deduce could be tied to people being burned out on all the bad. Messing up the sequels had a much bigger effect than you’re trying to downplay. They were the most important thing to get right and they failed.
Absolutely nothing is stopping you from picking things up again. I have never seen Ant-Man 3, The Marvels, or She-Hulk. Deadpool and Wolverine did over $1 billion at the box office despite being rated R in part because people were excited about Deadpool joining Disney’s MCU. I will be shocked if Avengers: Doomsday doesn’t do very well at the box office and restart a broader excitement about the MCU.
Yes, nothing SHOULD stop me. Yet I’ve stopped. Why is that and why have so many others joined me? That’s a question for Disney to answer if they ever want to resurrect their golden goose outside of scattered success compared to the Infinity Saga where every other movie either crossed $1 Billion or got close to it. Now they can barely make even.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
As enjoyable as Andor and Skeleton Crew were it doesn’t change that their numbers were far from impressive which it doesn’t take much to deduce could be tied to people being burned out on all the bad.
Burned out on the sequel trilogy from over 5 years ago? You clearly saw the shows. Why did you see them?
Yes, nothing SHOULD stop me. Yet I’ve stopped. Why is that and why have so many others joined me? That’s a question for Disney to answer if they ever want to resurrect their golden goose outside of scattered success compared to the Infinity Saga where every other movie either crossed $1 Billion or got close to it.
Again, my bet is that Avengers: Doomsday will get your butt and all the other butts in a theater seat. And I’m pretty confident Spider-Man: Brand New Day will also do very well. And after you see Avengers: Doomsday, I’ll bet you go back and watch F4.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
So you admit that Disney has created great Star Wars content? Frankly, better Star Wars content than George Lucas has made in over 40 years and maybe ever.

Andor was great. It also appealed to a very limited audience. I enjoyed Mando S1 and Rogue One. That does not make up for, say, the Book of Boba Fett, Solo, most of the sequel trilogy, Ashoka, Mando S3, Acolyte, and Skeleton Crew (see below).

They just made Skeleton Crew and Andor, some of the best Star Wars content ever made.

Those two projects don’t belong in the same sentence.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
Those two projects don’t belong in the same sentence.
Disagree.
Book of Boba Fett, Solo, most of the sequel trilogy, Ashoka, Mando S3, Acolyte, and Skeleton Crew (see below).
As a younger fan without much nostalgia for the original trilogy, Andor is better than any Star Wars George Lucas ever made. For me, it’s better than 4, 5, and 6. Even a nostalgic fan would have to admit it’s better than anything Lucas has made in over 40 years.

I’m excited about Mandalorian and Grogu as well as Starfighter.

Now, if Mandalorian and Grogu and Starfighter are great, combined with the positive reception of recent projects such as Andor and Skeleton Crew, would that change your tune?
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
So you admit that Disney has created great Star Wars content? Frankly, better Star Wars content than George Lucas has made in over 40 years and maybe ever.
The original trilogy still trumps anything Disney star wars. I love rogue one, and I thought Andor was really good as well. But they don't beat out the OT.
As I mentioned, I personally think Andor and Rogue One are a better trilogy than the original trilogy. Why should that not matter? Just because the sequels were mediocre doesn’t mean Lucasfilm hasn’t “figured out” Star Wars.
Personally because the sequels turned out how they did tells me exactly that lucasfilm hasn't figured out star wars. And the fact that they shut down theatrical star wars for over half a decade tells me the same. Let's not forget about the trainwreck that was the acolyte. That for sure wasn't figuring out star wars, the same goes for Kenobi. Lucasfilm had some good star wars.

Not many will argue rogue one, andor and the first 2 seasons of mando weren't good. But when push comes to shove, Lucasfilm is a lot more miss than hit. The franchise hasn't had any solid direction. The Mando and Grogu film seems to be a, hey we need something for theaters. Well this is popular, just do that. I'm sorry, there's just nothing about lucasfilm and Disney that says they figured out star wars.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
The original trilogy still trumps anything Disney star wars. I love rogue one, and I thought Andor was really good as well. But they don't beat out the OT.
It does for me. Again, I didn’t grow up with Star Wars.
Personally because the sequels turned out how they did tells me exactly that lucasfilm hasn't figured out star wars.
The newest film in the sequel trilogy is nearly 6 years old. About half of Lucasfilm’s employees didn’t even work there yet during production of the sequel trilogy.
The Mando and Grogu film seems to be a, hey we need something for theaters. Well this is popular, just do that. I'm sorry, there's just nothing about lucasfilm and Disney that says they figured out star wars.
And yet all you Star Wars fans were saying, “Why would they make a show about Cassian Andor? Who cares about this nobody?” Look at how wrong you were.

In the mind of a Star Wars fan, everything is suspect. It’s either “why are they making a show about this character nobody cares about?” or its “they’re only making this film because the characters are popular.”

Damned if they do, damned if they don’t.
 
Last edited:

phillip9698

Well-Known Member
Burned out on the sequel trilogy from over 5 years ago? You clearly saw the shows. Why did you see them?

Again, my bet is that Avengers: Doomsday will get your butt and all the other butts in a theater seat. And I’m pretty confident Spider-Man: Brand New Day will also do very well. And after you see Avengers: Doomsday, I’ll bet you go back and watch F4.

I'm willing to bet Disney doesn't want us to only show up to the movies that feature RDJ or Spiderman. They want us there for the other characters as well. Well, they lost me and countless others. I'm hearing that Thunderbolts and F4 are decent, well I'll find out when they hit Disney+.

With Star Wars I'm even more gone. I watched Andor and it's excellent. But past history has shown me they will be right back to creating slop in short order. I didn't bother with Ahsoka, Acolyte, Obi Won, and I wont be there for whatever is next with the Mando either. It's just a franchise that doesn't respect the audience or your time. It's just middling filler. I don't have time for that.

Word is they are trying to bring Rey back for the next major movie. That alone proves to me they still don't know what to do with the main line entries.

What they need to do is back up the Brinks truck to the guy who wrote Andor. He clearly understands Star Wars and what makes it work.
 
Last edited:

Mike S

Well-Known Member
Burned out on the sequel trilogy from over 5 years ago?
You admit you’re young so I don’t blame you but you’re continuing to downplay how important the sequels were to people that grew up with the OT characters.
You clearly saw the shows. Why did you see them?
I watched the shows I heard were actually good because unlike Marvel there’s nothing you miss by skipping the crap.
Again, my bet is that Avengers: Doomsday will get your butt and all the other butts in a theater seat. And I’m pretty confident Spider-Man: Brand New Day will also do very well. And after you see Avengers: Doomsday, I’ll bet you go back and watch F4.
Actually, no I won’t. Robert Downey Jr. being dragged in out of desperation has no interest from me. You have me on Spider-Man though because they’ve yet to screw him up.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
Actually, no I won’t. Robert Downey Jr. being dragged in out of desperation has no interest from me.
We’ll see about that LOL! 😂
I watched the shows I heard were actually good because unlike Marvel there’s nothing you miss by skipping the crap.
I’ve skipped some stuff from Marvel too. Haven’t felt like I missed out on anything. You can watch F4 without ever seeing a single Marvel film or TV show. The characters were completely isolated from the rest of the MCU.

My mother loved it and she doesn’t have a clue about Marvel.
You admit you’re young so I don’t blame you but you’re continuing to downplay how important the sequels were to people that grew up with the OT characters.
I don’t see why it matters. If Disney were to announce tomorrow that the sequel trilogy is being de-canonized, how would that make you feel?
 
Last edited:

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
Ok, I’m a woman and some of the comments in this thread are bordering on offensive. Quality content appeals across the board to female and male audiences.

But to blame failures on trying to appeal to women is ridiculous.

For the most part I agree, I think the bigger problem is the mindset behind Disneys “girl boss” ideology.

Disney doesn’t know how to make good, relatable, female characters because they are terrified of giving them flaws, or a weakness, or having them grow… their female characters don’t look inwards to improve themselves, they look outwards and point out external flaws in the world, to improve the audience.

People can smell BS from a mile away, Luke was relatable, he was a whiny kid who wanted a more exciting life, he had to train for years to become a Jedi, had to fight inner demons, had to overcome doubt… Rey was simply perfect from the start and everything just happened. Hulk endured years in isolation learning to control his emotions and his anger, SheHulk mastered it in a couple hours. I don’t think Disney understands that being a relatable person with doubts and internal struggles is a large part of what makes characters appealing.

I think that’s what I was trying to get at in my first post, we dream of overcoming our flaws, we’d dream of being big and strong because most of us were small and skinny (or chunky), we’d dream of being handsome (or pretty) because most of us were awkward and covered in acne, we’d dream of riding in on a white horse and saving the princess because most of us had no idea how to even talk to girls. My guess is the same is true of young girls, they dream of being a beautiful princess because they are just normal awkward teens who don’t stand out and aren’t “special”.

Disney has been making “girl boss” movies for a half decade now and I’d argue not a single character has been as strong as older “non girl boss” characters like Princess Leia, Ripley (from Aliens), Sarah Conner (from Terminator), etc. The older characters didn’t feel forced, they weren’t perfect, they were just people who ended up in bad situations and overcame them, aka strong men and strong women.

I’d be curious to know if this is a male view or shared by women also, I wouldn’t place any of the recent heroines as strong women, but Leia, Conner, Ripley… even characters like Katness and Hermione fall into this category… they are all very memorable strong women in large part because they are “normal” characters we can relate to who simply overcame overwhelming situations.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom