I see a smattering of problems as previously highlighted. The protracted preview window, the ticketing restrictions, typical retrenchment.
Mixed a little bit with 2/5 lands only really delivered fully on the immersion promise and we’ve seen the one before and really have seen the other before in other takes.
I’m trying not to fall into only hot takes before I’ve personally had a chance to experience it. But the park is meant to close the gap on WDW and I think how quickly Universal has been catching up is overstated. We’re now at year 25 and by year 27 of WDW we are into DAK.
Which speaking of, this park on most metrics does not overtake DAK. While it’s certainly not necessary and would be admirable if a new park overtook one almost 25 years old, on most metrics (capacity, immersion, food, attractions, entertainment, thematic integration) it either approaches, matches or in some cases misses DAK. It’s hard to extol endless enthusiasm when it missed that benchmark.
BUT - almost as good as DAK is a heck of a good effort from my lens. I just wish the other parks weren’t sidelined, as is typical when resorts expand gates.