News Coco Boat Ride Coming to Disney California Adventure

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Is Disney not interested in giving us a suspended UP ride? As much as I appreciate Redwood Creek for the kiddos I might be willing to give it up for an UP ride. Something sounds very appealing about boarding little houses with balloons on top and going on a suspended modern D to E ticket version of Peter Pan’s flight. Consider this my first post in Operation Manifest an UP ride at DCA.

Or I could see them building a sort of Pixar version of Disney Springs in the Simba lot one day. I think that sounds preferable to any large 10 acre + single IP land with any of the remaining/ unused IP. That exists now anyway.
As it’s already technically themed to Up, you just want to swap out the experience for an actual ride? Maybe not the best use for the area but sure why not, though I think for as low maintenance as it is now I think Disney will probably leave it as a kids play area and just expand elsewhere.

Though I know that would disappoint many that had hoped for a Gravity Falls retheme of the area as that seemed like a perfect place.
 

mlayton144

Well-Known Member
As it’s already technically themed to Up, you just want to swap out the experience for an actual ride? Maybe not the best use for the area but sure why not, though I think for as low maintenance as it is now I think Disney will probably leave it as a kids play area and just expand elsewhere.

Though I know that would disappoint many that had hoped for a Gravity Falls retheme of the area as that seemed like a perfect place.

IMO Up is the one of the top 3 Pixar movies ever , thumbs up for any attempt to bring an Up D level ticket to either USA resort.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Is Disney not interested in giving us a suspended UP ride? As much as I appreciate Redwood Creek for the kiddos I might be willing to give it up for an UP ride. Something sounds very appealing about boarding little houses with balloons on top and going on a suspended modern D to E ticket version of Peter Pan’s flight. Consider this my first post in Operation Manifest an UP ride at DCA.

Or I could see them building a sort of Pixar version of Disney Springs in the Simba lot one day. I think that sounds preferable to any large 10 acre + single IP land with any of the remaining/ unused IP. That exists now anyway.

It appeared in the Tokyo Adventureland Blue Sky artwork. Which means it’s at least now a thought circulating.

Though my first choice for Up historically was going to be a South America land in DAK (or now tropical Americas) and an Adventureland of some sort always made sense. Not Disneyland per se. Though Moana is pining in the Adventureland space.

Up, Inside out and for the love of god gimme Aladdin are things we still kind of lack on a worldwide stage. Wall E might be too fleeting (I love it) and Moana is a when, not if. Though mad props for TDS having basically an Aladdin land without my signature attraction. Someone give me my Aladdin attraction, I want it.
 

MistaDee

Well-Known Member
I love El Rio del Tiempo (ahem, Gran Fiesta Tour). I'd be thrilled to get something of that scope into DCA.

I'm setting my expectations very, very low. No drop, 3.5 minutes, a few scenes with lazy staging and AAs that just stand there talking to the boats as they float by. A breezy way to kill 20 minutes at DCA and get some air conditioning in a very unshaded corner of the park. Anything more and I'll be very pleased.

Expectations & Comparables
This got me thinking about what sort of comparable experiences we might use to baseline our expectations upon. So I asked ChatGPT to build a table for our use:
RideDisney Resort ParkYear BuiltLength (min)Sq.Ft of Building (est.)Boat Size (riders)Theoretical Hourly Capacity (est.)# of Show Scenes (est.)# of Audio‑Animatronics (est.)Cost Today (USD, est.)Drops/Thrill Elements?Notes
Frozen Ever After (HK)Hong Kong Disneyland20235~70,000 sq ft16~1,000~8–10~20–30~$300 MYes – small backward dropBased on EPCOT ride, enhanced
Tangled (Rapunzel’s Lantern Festival)Tokyo DisneySea20245~80–100k sq ft16~1,200~7–8~15–20$250–350 MNoCalm, romantic boat ride
Frozen (Anna & Elsa’s Frozen Journey)Tokyo DisneySea20246.5~100,000 sq ft16~1,000~8–10~20–30$300–400 MYes – backward segment, small dropMore elaborate than HK version
Mystic ManorHong Kong Disneyland20137~60,000 sq ft~8~1,20010–1240–50~$150 MYes – fast motion, spinTrackless, chaotic energy
Sinbad’s Storybook VoyageTokyo DisneySea2001 (rev. 2007)~10~50,000 sq ft8~800~12–15~30–40$80–120 MNoGentle, musical dark ride
Pirates of the Caribbean: Battle for the Sunken TreasureShanghai Disneyland2016~10~80,000 sq ft8~1,000~12–1540–60~$200 MYes – high-speed, directional shiftsHigh-tech motion base boats
Na’vi River JourneyAnimal Kingdom201710~70,000 sq ft8–12~1,200~1530+~$200 MNoPeaceful, bioluminescent setting
Gran Fiesta Tour Starring The Three CaballerosEPCOT2007 (overlay of 1982 ride)12~90,000 sq ft8~1,500~18–20~15–20~$30–50 M (overlay only)NoFeatures screens, music, and 3 AAs
El Río del TiempoEPCOT198212~90,000 sq ft8~1,50020–2550–70~$900 M (inflation adj.)NoReplaced by Gran Fiesta Tour
It’s a Small WorldDisneyland196615~50,000 sq ft16~1,800~25300+~$500 M (inflation adj.)NoGentle boat ride for all ages

Note: A lot of these estimates are clearly very funky, especially inflation adjusted estimates, Rio del Tiempo costing $1B but mystic manor is $150M?

Generally for expectations, 5 minutes seems to be the minimum if the table is to be trusted. Even if that includes some lower density "chill" time and no drops.

I'm hoping, we get something more along the lines of Tokyo FEA, 6-7 minutes, a few minor drops to punctuate the experience, and tons of charming AAs - even if they are more limited than the super expensive Tiana's ones I want to see tons and tons of skeleton people moving just enough to be convincing. The 2.5D tech used for MMRR would be highly effective if utilized in a more supporting manner here, backing up the large # of skeletons

My unreasonable dream is they go hard and we get a wests coast Coco version of Sinbad from Tokyo - the puppet aesthetic and the Dia de los Muertos feel like a match made in heaven and at least for my understanding, seem like a great way to put a ton of show elements on stage without breaking the bank on hyper realistic human AAs

exactly. and honestly the most impressive animatronic/scene is Rapunzel singing from the tower…. which you can see off-ride and in the queue lol
the Lantern scene easily clears the outdoor scene no? But I am a fan of having more show elements that you can experience without needing to be on the specific ride: more stuff like Splash's train scene, the Peoplemover going through other rides, or even like Berk at Epic or this Tangled scene

Idk if this will make ppl angry but I am in full favor of them ripping out all of Paradise Gardens, Goofys, and Little Mermaid to make it a South American pair/port across from Pixar Pier and throwing in Up or Encanto there
I'm very curious to see what comes of this space, I think Coco will mark the end of the "Pixar Pier" zone and set up a Plaza area that can serve as secondary hub/roundabout for people moving between the Pier, Simba lot and the Mermaid/Performance Corridor direction.

If Disney plan to utilize Encanto, Moana or other IP that are similarly distant from the California roots of the theme, having a somewhat generic Spanish colonial port of call acting as the nexus point between those areas makes some (typically tenuous Late Disney logic) sense. Way back when in the 1700s, California was indeed part of a global maritime trade network that connected Alta California with central Mexico, New Granada in Colombia and the Philippines in the South China Sea.

As for what they specifically choose to do with what's left of Paradise Gardens, Goofy, Jellyfish and Zephyr, they could go a number of directions, staying vaguely victorian like Paradise Pier 2.0 and the Lil Mermaid exterior, which would work for a transitory plaza space. Lil Mermaid can float a little thematically given the connection to the ocean.

I don't see them having the flume dip into Paradise Bay at all mostly because that would necessitate the attraction to close during World of Color performances.
Splashing down into a World of Color performance sounds absolutely incredible tbh

My mental formula is that 60 seconds of thrill can replace 2.5 minutes of chill. So that’s generally why you’d feel a 2 minute thrill ride or a 5 minute chill ride are too short. But 3/7.5 minutes respectively feel good.

Frozen and B&TB in Tokyo arguably have some occasional moments of thrill and that’s why they seem to play so well.

Na’vi and Tangled I believe were both internally classified as C tickets. Or Na’vi was at least. I still suspect this is more a D ticket. Maybe 6-7 minutes of mostly chill.
Wow great thought, what an intriguing hypothesis. I definitely agree that even a little thrill like on Pirates can make for a sum greater than its parts. If that is more specifically somatic thrill, exerting g-forces on the body, there's another category that I guess would be called "awe" or "wonder"

Moments like the ballroom scene in HM or emerging into the bay between the ship and the fort in Pirates, or the Kylo Ren finale on Rise, which to me feel similarly "dense" with a magical finale scene that lasts only 30 seconds but feels like 2 minutes of more chill set-up time moving through the caves etc.

Instead of physical thrills, these moments of awe/wonder are elicited through really powerful use of story, music, special effects etc. that overwhelm the senses.

Best of all is when you can put them together, but I don't think that will be the emphasis for Coco
 
Last edited:

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Expectations & Comparables
This got me thinking about what sort of comparable experiences we might use to baseline our expectations upon. So I asked ChatGPT to build a table for our use:
RideDisney Resort ParkYear BuiltLength (min)Sq.Ft of Building (est.)Boat Size (riders)Theoretical Hourly Capacity (est.)# of Show Scenes (est.)# of Audio‑Animatronics (est.)Cost Today (USD, est.)Drops/Thrill Elements?Notes
Frozen Ever After (HK)Hong Kong Disneyland20235~70,000 sq ft16~1,000~8–10~20–30~$300 MYes – small backward dropBased on EPCOT ride, enhanced
Tangled (Rapunzel’s Lantern Festival)Tokyo DisneySea20245~80–100k sq ft16~1,200~7–8~15–20$250–350 MNoCalm, romantic boat ride
Frozen (Anna & Elsa’s Frozen Journey)Tokyo DisneySea20246.5~100,000 sq ft16~1,000~8–10~20–30$300–400 MYes – backward segment, small dropMore elaborate than HK version
Mystic ManorHong Kong Disneyland20137~60,000 sq ft~8~1,20010–1240–50~$150 MYes – fast motion, spinTrackless, chaotic energy
Sinbad’s Storybook VoyageTokyo DisneySea2001 (rev. 2007)~10~50,000 sq ft8~800~12–15~30–40$80–120 MNoGentle, musical dark ride
Pirates of the Caribbean: Battle for the Sunken TreasureShanghai Disneyland2016~10~80,000 sq ft8~1,000~12–1540–60~$200 MYes – high-speed, directional shiftsHigh-tech motion base boats
Na’vi River JourneyAnimal Kingdom201710~70,000 sq ft8–12~1,200~1530+~$200 MNoPeaceful, bioluminescent setting
Gran Fiesta Tour Starring The Three CaballerosEPCOT2007 (overlay of 1982 ride)12~90,000 sq ft8~1,500~18–20~15–20~$30–50 M (overlay only)NoFeatures screens, music, and 3 AAs
El Río del TiempoEPCOT198212~90,000 sq ft8~1,50020–2550–70~$900 M (inflation adj.)NoReplaced by Gran Fiesta Tour
It’s a Small WorldDisneyland196615~50,000 sq ft16~1,800~25300+~$500 M (inflation adj.)NoGentle boat ride for all ages


the Lantern scene easily clears the outdoor scene no? But I am a fan of having more show elements that you can experience without needing to be on the specific ride: more stuff like Splash's train scene, the Peoplemover going through other rides, or even like Berk at Epic or this Tangled scene


I'm very curious to see what comes of this space, I think Coco will mark the end of the "Pixar Pier" zone and set up a Plaza area that can serve as secondary hub/roundabout for people moving between the Pier, Simba lot and the Mermaid/Performance Corridor direction.

If Disney plan to utilize Encanto, Moana or other IP that are similarly distant from the California roots of the theme, having a somewhat generic Spanish colonial port of call acting as the nexus point between those areas makes some (typically tenuous Late Disney logic) sense. Way back when in the 1700s, California was indeed part of a global maritime trade network that connected Alta California with central Mexico, New Granada in Colombia and the Philippines in the South China Sea.

As for what they specifically choose to do with what's left of Paradise Gardens, Goofy, Jellyfish and Zephyr, they could go a number of directions, staying vaguely victorian like Paradise Pier 2.0 and the Lil Mermaid exterior, which would work for a transitory plaza space. Lil Mermaid can float a little thematically given the connection to the ocean.


Splashing down into a World of Color performance sounds absolutely incredible tbh


Wow great thought, what an intriguing hypothesis. I definitely agree that even a little thrill like on Pirates can make for a sum greater than its parts. If that is more specifically somatic thrill, exerting g-forces on the body, there's another category that I guess would be called "awe" or "wonder"

Moments like the ballroom scene in HM or emerging into the bay between the ship and the fort in Pirates, or the Kylo Ren finale on Rise, which to me feel similarly "dense" with a magical finale scene that lasts only 30 seconds but feels like 2 minutes of more chill set-up time moving through the caves etc.

Instead of physical thrills, these moments of awe/wonder are elicited through really powerful use of story, music, special effects etc. that overwhelm the senses.

Best of all is when you can put them together, but I don't think that will be the emphasis for Coco

I still think Frozen HK is the best comp. With Tangled one has to keep in mind that they were designing/ building three rides and a land simultaneously. One of those rides being an E ticket boat ride. Granted the same thing is like if going at DCA right now but they are all in different lands and are attractions of various scope/ scale. Most importantly the new attractions at DCA are serving different needs where all the FS attractions are catering to the same needs or demo.

I’d say this bodes well for Coco being at least a solid D ticket. Of course it depends on what one’s definition of a D is. The other day I said in lieu of some rumors I heard of only the parade warehouse being demo’d that I could see Coco having a C ticket scale with E ticket tech/ effects. Well if you average that out I guess you can make a case it’s a D. With that said, if they go multi level or get creative with the space they probably still have room for D+ ticket scale back there.
 

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
Expectations & Comparables
This got me thinking about what sort of comparable experiences we might use to baseline our expectations upon. So I asked ChatGPT to build a table for our use:
RideDisney Resort ParkYear BuiltLength (min)Sq.Ft of Building (est.)Boat Size (riders)Theoretical Hourly Capacity (est.)# of Show Scenes (est.)# of Audio‑Animatronics (est.)Cost Today (USD, est.)Drops/Thrill Elements?Notes
Frozen Ever After (HK)Hong Kong Disneyland20235~70,000 sq ft16~1,000~8–10~20–30~$300 MYes – small backward dropBased on EPCOT ride, enhanced
Tangled (Rapunzel’s Lantern Festival)Tokyo DisneySea20245~80–100k sq ft16~1,200~7–8~15–20$250–350 MNoCalm, romantic boat ride
Frozen (Anna & Elsa’s Frozen Journey)Tokyo DisneySea20246.5~100,000 sq ft16~1,000~8–10~20–30$300–400 MYes – backward segment, small dropMore elaborate than HK version
Mystic ManorHong Kong Disneyland20137~60,000 sq ft~8~1,20010–1240–50~$150 MYes – fast motion, spinTrackless, chaotic energy
Sinbad’s Storybook VoyageTokyo DisneySea2001 (rev. 2007)~10~50,000 sq ft8~800~12–15~30–40$80–120 MNoGentle, musical dark ride
Pirates of the Caribbean: Battle for the Sunken TreasureShanghai Disneyland2016~10~80,000 sq ft8~1,000~12–1540–60~$200 MYes – high-speed, directional shiftsHigh-tech motion base boats
Na’vi River JourneyAnimal Kingdom201710~70,000 sq ft8–12~1,200~1530+~$200 MNoPeaceful, bioluminescent setting
Gran Fiesta Tour Starring The Three CaballerosEPCOT2007 (overlay of 1982 ride)12~90,000 sq ft8~1,500~18–20~15–20~$30–50 M (overlay only)NoFeatures screens, music, and 3 AAs
El Río del TiempoEPCOT198212~90,000 sq ft8~1,50020–2550–70~$900 M (inflation adj.)NoReplaced by Gran Fiesta Tour
It’s a Small WorldDisneyland196615~50,000 sq ft16~1,800~25300+~$500 M (inflation adj.)NoGentle boat ride for all ages

Note: A lot of these estimates are clearly very funky, especially inflation adjusted estimates, Rio del Tiempo costing $1B but mystic manor is $150M?

Generally for expectations, 5 minutes seems to be the minimum if the table is to be trusted. Even if that includes some lower density "chill" time and no drops.

I'm hoping, we get something more along the lines of Tokyo FEA, 6-7 minutes, a few minor drops to punctuate the experience, and tons of charming AAs - even if they are more limited than the super expensive Tiana's ones I want to see tons and tons of skeleton people moving just enough to be convincing. The 2.5D tech used for MMRR would be highly effective if utilized in a more supporting manner here, backing up the large # of skeletons

My unreasonable dream is they go hard and we get a wests coast Coco version of Sinbad from Tokyo - the puppet aesthetic and the Dia de los Muertos feel like a match made in heaven and at least for my understanding, seem like a great way to put a ton of show elements on stage without breaking the bank on hyper realistic human AAs


the Lantern scene easily clears the outdoor scene no? But I am a fan of having more show elements that you can experience without needing to be on the specific ride: more stuff like Splash's train scene, the Peoplemover going through other rides, or even like Berk at Epic or this Tangled scene


I'm very curious to see what comes of this space, I think Coco will mark the end of the "Pixar Pier" zone and set up a Plaza area that can serve as secondary hub/roundabout for people moving between the Pier, Simba lot and the Mermaid/Performance Corridor direction.

If Disney plan to utilize Encanto, Moana or other IP that are similarly distant from the California roots of the theme, having a somewhat generic Spanish colonial port of call acting as the nexus point between those areas makes some (typically tenuous Late Disney logic) sense. Way back when in the 1700s, California was indeed part of a global maritime trade network that connected Alta California with central Mexico, New Granada in Colombia and the Philippines in the South China Sea.

As for what they specifically choose to do with what's left of Paradise Gardens, Goofy, Jellyfish and Zephyr, they could go a number of directions, staying vaguely victorian like Paradise Pier 2.0 and the Lil Mermaid exterior, which would work for a transitory plaza space. Lil Mermaid can float a little thematically given the connection to the ocean.


Splashing down into a World of Color performance sounds absolutely incredible tbh


Wow great thought, what an intriguing hypothesis. I definitely agree that even a little thrill like on Pirates can make for a sum greater than its parts. If that is more specifically somatic thrill, exerting g-forces on the body, there's another category that I guess would be called "awe" or "wonder"

Moments like the ballroom scene in HM or emerging into the bay between the ship and the fort in Pirates, or the Kylo Ren finale on Rise, which to me feel similarly "dense" with a magical finale scene that lasts only 30 seconds but feels like 2 minutes of more chill set-up time moving through the caves etc.

Instead of physical thrills, these moments of awe/wonder are elicited through really powerful use of story, music, special effects etc. that overwhelm the senses.

Best of all is when you can put them together, but I don't think that will be the emphasis for Coco

Laughing at it listing Navi with 30+ AA's.
 

MistaDee

Well-Known Member
Laughing at it listing Navi with 30+ AA's.
lol and is Navi really 10 minutes? I’m guessing no.

I told it "bad bot" and bonked it on the head:

RideDisney Resort ParkYear BuiltLength (min)Avg. Wait Time (min)Boat Size (riders)True AAs (est.)Major Animated Figures (est.)Cost Today (USD, est.)Drops/Thrill Elements?Pre-Show (Y/N & Duration)AA vs Animated Figure Footnotes
Na’vi River JourneyAnimal Kingdom20174.5518–1216–8~$200MNoNoOnly the Shaman is a true AA; rest are projections or basic motion elements
Frozen Ever After (HK)Hong Kong Disneyland20235551620–255~$300MYes – small backward dropNoA1000-class AAs (Elsa, Olaf, Marshmallow); some figures are screen or mapped effects
TangledTokyo DisneySea20245N/A1615–203–5$250–350MNoNoMostly stylized AAs of main characters; lantern scenes may rely on scenic effects
Frozen Journey (Tokyo)Tokyo DisneySea20246.5N/A1620–305–8$300–400MYes – backward segmentYes – ~2 minHigher AA count than EPCOT; several key figures enhanced; hybrid Olaf, Marshmallow likely
Mystic ManorHong Kong Disneyland20137N/A~840–503–5~$150MYes – fast motion, spinYes – ~1.5 minAlbert is a true AA; much of the animation comes from projection-mapped environments
Gran Fiesta TourEPCOT200779.1835–6~$30–50M (overlay)NoNoUses original 3 Caballeros AAs; remaining characters appear on video or projected
El Río del TiempoEPCOT19827.5N/A850–702–3~$900M (adj.)NoNoMost figures are repetitive mechanical AAs; very limited screen use
Sinbad’s Storybook VoyageTokyo DisneySea2001 (rev. 2007)~10N/A830–403–4$80–120MNoNoNearly all figures are stylized AAs; few projected elements like the genie
Pirates: Battle for the Sunken TreasureShanghai Disneyland2016~10N/A840–6010–12~$200MYes – high-speed motion & dropsYes – ~2.5 minJack, Barbossa are true AAs; many characters are projection-mapped or on massive screens
It’s a Small WorldDisneyland1966151816300+5–6~$500M (adj.)NoNoAll singing children and animals are true AAs with simple repetitive motion
 

MK-fan

Well-Known Member
so after California adventure completes its expansion with its next four attractions, the park will roughly be around 80 acres. besides expanding across the street to the hotel parking lot aka Disneyland Forward, is there any other space around the Park to expand or is it pretty much landlocked?
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
so after California adventure completes its expansion with its next four attractions, the park will roughly be around 80 acres. besides expanding across the street to the hotel parking lot aka Disneyland Forward, is there any other space around the Park to expand or is it pretty much landlocked?

Not without something being replaced but you have Sunset Showcase theatre, Hyperion, RedWood creek challenge trail and Goofys Sky School. I guess you could throw the Animation Building in there too but I think that’s safe for a while.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
so after California adventure completes its expansion with its next four attractions, the park will roughly be around 80 acres. besides expanding across the street to the hotel parking lot aka Disneyland Forward, is there any other space around the Park to expand or is it pretty much landlocked?
Within its existing footprint, that is pretty close to it for "expansion". But as they are expanding into other DLForward plots its not technically "landlocked", as that is the whole point of DLForward, to allow more room for future growth as needed.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I'm worried that somewhere on a WDI whiteboard, someone has written:

Avatar is DCA's Pirates of the Caribbean
Coco is DCA's Small World
Therefore, we don't need to have any waterfall chute in Coco.
Outside the desire by some to have a drop for a transition to the land of the dead, does Coco even have waterfalls or other similar elements that would lend itself to a drop? Because I can't think of any.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I'm worried that somewhere on a WDI whiteboard, someone has written:

Avatar is DCA's Pirates of the Caribbean
Coco is DCA's Small World
Therefore, we don't need to have any waterfall chute in Coco.

Unless they already look at Mermaid as IASW? You just have to be really out of touch to not give Coco a bit of thrill.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Outside the desire by some to have a drop for a transition to the land of the dead, does Coco even have waterfalls or other similar elements that would lend itself to a drop? Because I can't think of any.

Not really but that’s the besides the point as they chose to make it a water ride. I always thought Coco was better suited to be suspended.
 

ThemeParkTraveller

Well-Known Member
Outside the desire by some to have a drop for a transition to the land of the dead, does Coco even have waterfalls or other similar elements that would lend itself to a drop? Because I can't think of any.

I think the only water shown in Coco was that scene where Miguel got thrown into a cenote by Ernesto. That could work if they were going for a book report re-telling of the movie.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Not really but that’s the besides the point as they chose to make it a water ride. I always thought Coco was better suited to be suspended.
Yes but just because water ride was the ride profile they chose doesn't mean its required to have a "thrill" element such as a drop. That is just what some fans have put on the ride as an expectation after announcement.

When I think of "water" and "death" I think of the River Styx, which is a "lazy river" vibe not "thrill". And Coco doesn't have any different vibe to it when crossing the Marigold Bridge from the land of the living to the land of the dead. So I don't see where there will be this "drop" when the story doesn't even provide that.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom