MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

[rle4lunch]

But if people haven’t been visiting those attractions when headliners go down, what makes you think they will start doing it now?

I suppose Disney could have revamped those two attractions to make them more exciting but my guess is they didn’t think it would help. They were allowed to decline because of lack of use, not the other way around.

It’s hard to reconcile what I read here with what’s being said on the other threads as to what kind of capacity MK needs.

The parks were designed in a different age when the pace of life was more relaxed. Whether Disney’s decisions drove changes in guests’ expectations or guests’ changing expectations led to Disney’s decisions is an open debate that will likely never be agreed upon.

How in the world could you plus up the steamboat? The only way would be to do something with the river bank scenes I guess. TSI would be much easier to enhance. But if you were to plus up the river bank scenes you're basically adding another Jungle Cruise ride.

I dunno. I don't see how they could've saved it really. I rode it twice last month. There 'may' have been 12 people on board with me each time.

 

[EricsBiscuit]

It’s not word play. You’re just not being honest with yourself.

Two attractions are being destroyed. They are being destroyed so they can be replaced by 4 attractions. 4 Attractions that will have higher capacities and far higher utilization and popularity. It will also include Significant increases in walkable areas as well as multiple additional new food/beverage and merchandise locations. That is an expansion.

Actually, if you expand your time horizons just a bit to remember ones Disney has cut, there are 5 attractions we are losing/have lost: Richard F Irvine (Liberty Belle), Admiral Joe Fowler, TSI, canoes, & keel boats.

 

[mattpeto]

It’s not word play. You’re just not being honest with yourself.

Two attractions are being destroyed. They are being destroyed so they can be replaced by 4 attractions. 4 Attractions that will have higher capacities and far higher utilization and popularity. It will also include Significant increases in walkable areas as well as multiple additional new food/beverage and merchandise locations. That is an expansion.

I hope they add another nightime show (or vantage point) from Villains Land. Could we count that as a 5th attraction if so?

 

[mattpeto]

Actually, if you expand your time horizons just a bit to remember ones Disney has cut, there are 5 attractions we are losing/have lost: Richard F Irvine (Liberty Belle), Admiral Joe Fowler, TSI, canoes, & keel boats.

All stuff that couldn't survive for one reason or another.

 

[Animaniac93-98]

How in the world could you plus up the steamboat?

Look at what was done to Disneyland when Galaxy's Edge was added

Disneyland Paris is currently adding more scenes to their Rivers of the Far West

The boat itself may stay the same, but the route and scenery can be altered.

Or you give other methods of navigating the same area, like the canoes and keelboats did.

 

[peter11435]

Actually, if you expand your time horizons just a bit to remember ones Disney has cut, there are 5 attractions we are losing/have lost: Richard F Irvine (Liberty Belle), Admiral Joe Fowler, TSI, canoes, & keel boats.

I don’t think it’s fair to go back decades here. Honestly the fact that so many river attractions have closed over the years and they still can’t fill the riverboat is a good indication of the waning popularity for those attractions.

 

[flyerjab]

Fantasmic!

(And it wouldn't hurt to bring back Jedi Academy)

With the size of Galaxy’s Edge you could do two of these. Bring back the Jedi Academy for one. Then you could even do a Sith experience on the other end near the Empire’s shuttle.

I am way more on board with what Disney is doing these days. The one thing I wish they would reintroduce is streetmosphere. I loved all that and really felt like it livened up the parks.

 

[SamusAranX]

Replacements can increase capacity. That doesn’t make them expansions. They still REPLACED existing attractions.

This is desperate.

Not to mention filling the capacity holes left by rotting space (looking at you Stitch)

 

[Casper Gutman]

But if people haven’t been visiting those attractions when headliners go down, what makes you think they will start doing it now?

Not every attraction has to be packed all the time. That would make for a MISERABLE experience. You need slack.

Also - and pardon me if I’m remembering incorrectly - you don’t wait in lines, do you? That may skew your perspective.

I suppose Disney could have revamped those two attractions to make them more exciting but my guess is they didn’t think it would help. They were allowed to decline because of lack of use, not the other way around.

This is a gross oversimplification at best. If Disney wanted people to use TSI it would have been the easiest thing in the world to make happen. Stick a couple meet n greets out there and the rafts are at capacity. Paris is currently plussing their riverboat in a wonderful way.

Everyone here KNOWS Disney is very sophisticated in the ways it makes crowds go where they want. Everyone here knows about weenies and which way crowds flow based on age. But when it comes to “underused” attractions, suddenly a lot of posters forget all that.

It’s hard to reconcile what I read here with what’s being said on the other threads as to what kind of capacity MK needs.

MK does not have a space problem. It has huge amounts of expansion space. It has abandoned space IN THE PARK - Stitch, Terrace, Tortuga, etc. - something certain posters (not you) keep trying to dodge. Their is NO NEED to eliminate the second most iconic geographic feature of the park, something aesthetically and thematically integral to three major attractions, to increase capacity.

Remember, Disney ANNOUNCED a massive “Beyond Thunder Mountain” expansion that would have preserved Rivers. They shifted because of MONEY.

The parks were designed in a different age when the pace of life was more relaxed. Whether Disney’s decisions drove changes in guests’ expectations or guests’ changing expectations led to Disney’s decisions is an open debate that will likely never be agreed upon.

These kind of sweeping cultural and historical platitudes are ALWAYS nonsense based on nothing.

Disney has agency. Almost everything that happens in the park happens because they want it to or, at least, they let it. The constant attempt to erase Disneys agency to shield them from responsibility is very frustrating.

 

[Chi84]

Not every attraction has to be packed all the time. That would make for a MISERABLE experience. You need slack.

Also - and pardon me if I’m remembering incorrectly - you don’t wait in lines, do you? That may skew your perspective.

This is a gross oversimplification at best. If Disney wanted people to use TSI it would have been the easiest thing in the world to make happen. Stick a couple meet n greets out there and the rafts are at capacity. Paris is currently plussing their riverboat in a wonderful way.

Everyone here KNOWS Disney is very sophisticated in the ways it makes crowds go where they want. Everyone here knows about weenies and which way crowds flow based on age. But when it comes to “underused” attractions, suddenly a lot of posters forget all that.

MK does not have a space problem. It has huge amounts of expansion space. It has abandoned space IN THE PARK - Stitch, Terrace, Tortuga, etc. - something certain posters (not you) keep trying to dodge. Their is NO NEED to eliminate the second most iconic geographic feature of the park, something aesthetically and thematically integral to three major attractions, to increase capacity.

Remember, Disney ANNOUNCED a massive “Beyond Thunder Mountain” expansion that would have preserved Rivers. They shifted because of MONEY.

These kind of sweeping cultural and historical platitudes are ALWAYS nonsense based on nothing.

Disney has agency. Almost everything that happens in the park happens because they want it to or, at least, they let it. The constant attempt to erase Disneys agency to shield them from responsibility is very frustrating.

I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make.

Of course Disney has agency but it makes the decisions it does based on data and analysis, costs and other factors. I doubt it decided to remove these two attractions for no reason whatsoever.

I can understand disagreeing with Disney’s decisions but many posters are suggesting ways that Disney could have kept attractions it clearly decided against keeping.

 

[Chi84]

Also - and pardon me if I’m remembering incorrectly - you don’t wait in lines, do you?

Yep, I’m the one.

 

[Incomudro]

I don’t remember people arguing for years that these areas should go. Most who didn’t care for them just skipped them.

Oh, there are people who have argued the Tree House should go too.

 

[WaltWiz1901]

No, I think they made the right call here. They never let any non-car character interact with the car characters. The worlds are entirely separate.

never explicitly suggested having them crossover (and I wouldn't have anyway).

all of which only compounds my point: there was zero need to slap Woodlore's name onto this "new" character of theirs, and it reeks of desperate fanservice to get the people opposed to this move (for good reason) onboard

 

[RS Carlson]

I'm new to this blog. What does "IP" mean?

 

[Delta-7]

I'm new to this blog. What does "IP" mean?

Intellectual Property

 

[𝐌𝖆𝖓 𝖎𝖓 𝐖𝖊𝖇]

I'm new to this blog. What does "IP" mean?

IP is the catch-all term for Disney branded stuffs, characters, movies, etc. Welcome to the forum! Though like college football teams, you have to pick a side now. It's the rules. Pro or against? You can't switch later. Keep in mind that whatever you choose, will alienate at least 50% right off the bat. No pressure.

So what's your thoughts on the Piston Peak Cars-themed area?

 

[Incomudro]

IP is the catch-all term for Disney branded stuffs, characters, movies, etc. Welcome to the forum! Though like college football teams, you have to pick a side now. It's the rules. Pro or against? You can't switch later. Keep in mind that whatever you choose, will alienate at least 50% right off the bat. No pressure.

So what's your thoughts on the Piston Peak Cars-themed area?

All while avoiding the fact that Snow White's Scary Adventure, Mr. Toad, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, The Swiss Family Robinson Tree House, Splash Mountain etc., were all IP.

 

[MisterPenguin]

I'm new to this blog. What does "IP" mean?

Thread 'Big List of Forum Abbreviations'

Mar 25, 2018

20k – 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, MK, defunct

7DMT – Seven Dwarfs Mine Train

AA – American Adventure

AA – Audio Animatronics

ABD – Adventures By Disney (world-wide tourist experiences)

AC – Adventurer's Club (defunct) at Pleasure Island (defunct) at Disney Springs

AC – Avenger's Campus

ADR – Advanced Dining Reservation, or, what normal people call 'restaurant reservations'

AE – Alien Encounter (replaced by Stitch's Great Escape), MK

AH – After Hours, upcharge time in the parks after closure to the general public, very limited attendance so as to make most of the rides a...

• MisterPenguin
• Replies: 40
• Forum: WDW Parks General Discussion

• 
• 

 

[flynnibus]

Using the logic stated why would they have ever have added things over the years to expand park offerings?

Because it's not a binary thing? Because the decisions at different times happened in different settings? Because at some points you ARE actually looking to expand and not just get a certain attraction in place.

The conversation here was about why they don't just bother to expand instead of replace. Because expanding and replacing are not equivalent things.

 

[flynnibus]

Unless you're a Disney employee or own Disney stock, why do you care about that?

Because we chose to live in reality and not just dreams where people don't face reality?