TP2000
Well-Known Member
I probably could have prevented 12 posts if TP knew I didn’t use 25% but 50%.
Sorry that was not clear!
No worries, I'm sure it's not your fault. I'm likely to blame as much as anyone as I skimmed and caught up on this thread randomly for 20 or 30 minutes at a time over the long holiday weekend, while salads chilled and coals heated up and I tried to remember if the next event was Adults Only for my sanity.
If you are okay with the traditional 50% of the production budget going to marketing, instead of somehow amortizing that over some unknown number of years into the future and thus pegging the marketing costs as only 25% of production now, that works for me.
I fully get it, Disney is marketing these movies to cement them into pop culture memory banks so they get streamed and rented for years into the future. But that doesn't erase the fact they spent that marketing budget now in 2025 while the things were in actual theaters. Like studios have done since before they added sound in 1927.
That said, for the past few years on Disney's ridiculously huge, bloated budgets, I would generally cap the marketing budget at $100 Million no matter what the production budget was. For example, Snow White cost them $270 Million (that we know of so far), but I only pegged their marketing at $100 Million instead of $135 for accounting purposes. The exceptions are when reputable sources quote the marketing spend as higher than 50% of production, like Variety has done for the $140 Million spent on The Little Mermaid or the $100 Million spent on Lilo & Stitch.