Tom Morrow
Well-Known Member
"Being pregnant" is a condition that a person can be in 

That is actually a thing you will find in the hospitality industry. Although many have moved away from this in recent times...Not to mention the unnecessary capitalization of "Guests."
It’s not classified as a medical condition in a legal sense, but depending on insurance context — and likely based on whoever approved the phrasing at UO — it can be treated as one.The grammar ain't so hot either.
I never knew that "Expectant Mothers" was a condition. "Oh, you're due in six months?! Why, I didn't know you had Expectant Mothers condition!!"
Not to mention the unnecessary capitalization of "Guests."
At least "restraints" was spelled correctly. And props to the Oxford comma.
"Being pregnant" is a condition that a person can be in![]()
It’s not classified as a medical condition in a legal sense, but depending on insurance context — and likely based on whoever approved the phrasing at UO — it can be treated as one.
English is my third language, and I live in a 3-way intersection on the spectrum.Are you all secretly aliens or A.I. bots having trouble with colloquial language?![]()
Oh, I didn't realize you had the condition of Non-Native Speakers.English is my third language, and I live in a 3-way intersection on the spectrum.
I went to an American school. It helped.Oh, I didn't realize you had the condition of Non-Native Speakers.
![]()
The area is one of the hottest in central Florida. It could definitely use some mist.I'm still waiting for all the complaints of the mist it forms when there's a strong breeze...
My point is, as I mentioned -- the grammar of it all.
Not at all a statement about those who are pregnant excluding themselves from riding the ride.
Of course "pregnancy" is a "condition." It is a "state of being," that is, a "condition."
But "Pregnant Mothers" isn't a "condition," it's a "class."
No one ever says, "Oh, do you have the condition of 'Pregnant Mother'"? Instead, we say, "Oh, are you pregnant?"
The sign doesn't say "being pregnant." It says "...persons with the...condition: ...Pregnant Mothers."
The point it wants to make it makes by using bad grammar.
Are you all secretly aliens or A.I. bots having trouble with colloquial language?![]()
Oh, so they like repeating their mistakes. Got it.the signs are also laid out exactly the same and use the same verbiage as the attraction signs at USF and IOA.
I'm still waiting for all the complaints of the mist it forms when there's a strong breeze...
Atleast its filtered & chlorinated clear water, super tempting to jump in and swim in it on a hot day.I'm still waiting for all the complaints of the mist it forms when there's a strong breeze...
I take it you never visit regional parks at all. The signs at those parks are similar.Oh, so they like repeating their mistakes. Got it.
So Universal is the equivalent of a poorly run regional park even though they pay an entire staff of lawyers and graphic artists to put together warning signs?I take it you never visit regional parks at all. The signs at those parks are similar.
Most guests probably don't care that the language on a sign is not proper.
My suggestion is those that are nit picking things like this, go back to The Mouse.
Expecting signs to be printed without error is nitpicking? Besides, Disney has also had errors on their printed signs too.My suggestion is those that are nit picking things like this, go back to The Mouse.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.