Right…
It’s a bad look for them. Just as the second Chinese park was.
A 75 year old trying to “globalize” on his way out as an homage to himself.
Disagree with me now…agree with me down the road. Have at it.
Let's change the order and let me agree now...
There is a very small group of people that said Disney supported / (agreed / was in cahoots with) / choose an expression with the Chinese government. And that it was bad.
The only time I remember them being vocal / given some (small) media exposure was during the "don't say gay" bill situation.
Beyond that, I don't remember any indignation with Disney over this.
The parks didn't do that well in this last report. But they do have some pretty amazing rides (their version of POTC in particular looks amazing), and Disney is still making money from it.
So from a business standpoint, not a bad look.
As far as Abu Dhabi, UNI tried to strike a deal with the UAE and failed. So just from that perspective, it is a pretty big score for Iger and a testament to his ability as CEO (let's say the homage to himself part is there).
(for the record, I am not a fan and I don't like him, but I give credit where it's due)
As someone else mentioned (can't remember who though), the UAE is not Saudi Arabia. My uncle that lived there 11 years met his wife there, and even though we can sure find some concerning reports (though that's true for pretty much everywhere), it is a place where inhabitants largely feel safe, and certainly not a hallmark of disrespect to human lives.
So, do I think it was a bad business move? I don't.
Hopefully you'll agree with me down the road!