Will the new Pizza Planet being built in TSL have air conditioning? Asking for a friend...
I don't have to get used to it. I don't have any problem with it at all. Everything has it's own purpose and it's own value. I was actually agreeing that it is short, but, short isn't automatically bad. RnRC, 7DMT and now the TSL one... not a problem for me.Get used to it, Tron is very short too.
Agreed. Most coasters have a short ride time, especially if we don't include the lift hill(s). Nature of the beast.I don't have to get used to it. I don't have any problem with it at all. Everything has it's own purpose and it's own value. I was actually agreeing that it is short, but, short isn't automatically bad. RnRC, 7DMT and now the TSL one... not a problem for me.
I believe it's 11 acres.
including backstage areas
I do however think they are including Midway Mania.Yes, if you include TSMM, which is indeed part of the land.
Uh.... what backstage area? There isn't any building that is 'backstage' that is in the land. There is a storage shed for the coasters, but no one, when reporting on the acreage of MK, let's say, cuts out all the rides storage sheds. Similarly, the CM paths and control rooms are all minimal.
A coaster can be as long as the designer and park owner want. The dual-launch Taron at Phantasialand is a beautifully themed, high-speed, lengthy coaster that breaks several records (yet due to local height restrictions is no taller than Slinky). Disney is not interested in spending that much money on their dual-launch coaster (although, who knows, maybe Imagineering can "magically" make the Slinky ride cost as much as Taron.Agreed. Most coasters have a short ride time, especially if we don't include the lift hill(s). Nature of the beast.
California Screamin' and Expedition Everest are perfect examples of large, lengthy Disney coasters. They don't have to be record breakers. But they shouldn't be half-baked.Of course Disney will always have a self imposed limit on size of roller coasters. They would never build something big like Hulk or Fury 365 because huge rides are not their market.
I do however think they are including Midway Mania.
Barely themed naked coasters aren't their market either, but they're getting ready to open a land that offers little else. Why let tradition stop them from building some giant coasters?Of course Disney will always have a self imposed limit on size of roller coasters. They would never build something big like Hulk or Fury 365 because huge rides are not their market.
I do however think they are including Midway Mania.
Yes, if you include TSMM, which is indeed part of the land.
LOL. Sometimes reading is hard.Isn't that what I just said??...
LOL the back and forth about this land really does amuse me.
Let's be honest any new land has a lot of back and forth.
D) Obsessively watch ALL the walk-thru and ride-thru videos, and uphold some irrelevant blogger's opinion as their own...
For what it's worth, I always preface my humble, squeaky-voiced 2nd-hand opinions with an "I'm basing this solely on watching Youtube videos," disclaimer.I don't think that's likely. They'll come to their own decision.... solely based on YouTube videos.
Is this time still what we think it will be, the track seems huge, but maybe 50secs in a long time.I've heard no stop before the first launch. A short hold before second launch.
Approx. 50 secs. ride time.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.