They had the best person for the job - he designed the masterpiece they are destroying now…. Those folks are being pushed out and few, if any, remain in the company.Just get the best people for the jobs. That's all that matters.
Yep. It’s important to remember that, no matter how different the dark ride experience may be, the ride is still filling the same functional role as Splash did. It’s the main water ride at their flagship park in central Florida. I doubt they want it closed for two summers in a row. It will be open as soon as it’s ready to (unlike say, Rat, which opened about a year and a half after it was done).Sometimes Disney chooses opening dates based on marketing, thus, sometimes delaying the opening.
From what some insiders have been saying, it seems that Disney simply wants it open as soon as possible (with still the likely previews for CMs, DVCers, APers, etc...).
So, it will open when ready... most likely... without regard for marketing, seasons, or cross promotions.
I do not understand how you could possibly think you’d be a better judge of what fits and what’s out of place on this yet-unfinished attraction than the imagineers and Louisiana-based artists who are building it.Some of the weirdest marketing I’ve ever seen for any ride. Nobody cares. Yay we have artists from New Orleans painting murals that look out of place and authentic weathervanes and drum set replicas lol. But not the best song or the bad guy from the movie. What a joke.
I do not understand how you could possibly think you’d be a better judge of what fits and what’s out of place on this yet-unfinished attraction than the imagineers and Louisiana-based artists who are building it.
The marketing is focusing exactly on the things the creatives are focusing on. I take all their words at face value. They feel they are building an exciting attraction and audiences will share in their enthusiasm. We’ll see!It doesn’t take a genius to realize that if the recipe calls for salt and you forget to put it in that the dish will come out bland. Or that purposely leaving out the best parts of the movie and elements that your fans are expecting/wanting on the ride is a bad idea. You also don’t need to be a genius to understand what’s driving this project. You bring up the imagineers but they re only second in command here.
The artists are contract for hire working on one thing. The weathervane guy is hired to make the weathervane. Not sure what that has to do with anything. I’m not commenting on the quality of their work. I’m commenting on how weird the marketing for this ride is and that Disney is focused on the wrong things.
The marketing is focusing exactly on the things the creatives are focusing on. I take all their words at face value. They feel they are building an exciting attraction and audiences will share in their enthusiasm. We’ll see!
I don’t mind teasers and insight like this, but it should definitely be more balanced with teasers of actual substance..Some of the weirdest marketing I’ve ever seen for any ride. Nobody cares. Yay we have artists from New Orleans painting murals that look out of place and authentic weathervanes and drum set replicas lol. But not the best song or the bad guy from the movie. What a joke.
Oh I agree with you. I honestly think the creatives on this believe their idea is more enticing to general audiences than including the songs and characters in the film. I do think it will be difficult to quantify whether this is a better or worse attraction ultimatelyAt the end of the day it will still be a log flume in Disneyland/ MK with a great layout with 3 fun drops and music. There is no way it can fail. But that doesn’t mean it’s not frustrating to not see it live up to its potential.
As much as certain things don’t make sense about this ride (like the facade for example) the odds are that TBA will be more fun than a purpose built PatF attraction. Riding around another warehouse in trackless vehicles shaped like boats doesn’t sound very fun to me. They get a nice jump start by building off of Baxter and teams work.
Oh I agree with you. I honestly think the creatives on this believe their idea is more enticing to general audiences than including the songs and characters in the film. I do think it will be difficult to quantify whether this is a better or worse attraction ultimately
The mural on the barn at the very least is complete as far as I'm aware. And it does indeed look out of place. It's an absurd argument that only artists or imagineers have the authority to decide what looks correct and that no other opinions are valid. Especially when considering the people that currently work at WDI.I do not understand how you could possibly think you’d be a better judge of what fits and what’s out of place on this yet-unfinished attraction than the imagineers and Louisiana-based artists who are building it.
The artists are contract for hire working on one thing. The weathervane guy is hired to make the weathervane. Not sure what that has to do with anything. I’m not commenting on the quality of their work. I’m commenting on how weird the marketing for this ride is and that Disney is focused on the wrong things.
I don't think it's a coincidence they've dropped the "late 2024" from every piece of promo for it, on top of the other info shared by others in this thread saying it could open sooner. Everything is pointing towards WDW's opening being sooner than originally expected.Interesting teaser at the end. I wonder if they believe it’ll open sooner than expected.
Hopefully it’s opening early but I also wouldn’t be surprised if they are just trying to get more people to book a summer/fall trip rather than waiting for winter.I don't think it's a coincidence they've dropped the "late 2024" from every piece of promo for it, on top of the other info shared by others in this thread saying it could open sooner. Everything is pointing towards WDW's opening being sooner than originally expected.
Before:
View attachment 761902
After:
View attachment 761904
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.