Stripes
Well-Known Member
Most likely.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
AVATAR land coming to Disney's Animal Kingdom
- Thread starter DocMcHulk
- Start date
flyerjab
Well-Known Member
I loved the Lord of the Rings, but what they did to the Hobbit was a travesty.
Cesar R M
Well-Known Member
its amazing how the older WETA cgi looked better than most of the hobbit.
The water chase was way too goofy for example. and looked easily fake.
Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
From what I remember is they were trying to make the Hobbit more kid friendly since The Hobbit was a children's book.
flyerjab
Well-Known Member
Not to perpetuate this thread drift, but I was a LOTR and Hobbit devotee ever since early high school so I worshipped at the alter of Tolkien. The LOTR movies were masterfully done as Pete Jackson and company had figure out how to trim down the story (for the most part) and still make it work. For the Hobbit, they decided that for the purposes of making more money, they made 3 movies instead of 2 and had to add in a lot of stuff. I couldn't believe it when I saw it. They butchered what was a charming kids story, and totally beefed up other parts of the story or created things that never even existed. It was an absolute travesty for me, as well as a huge disappointment.
Ok, I am done drifting now...
PorterRedkey
Well-Known Member
No thanks! However, I don't put it past Disney. If they do present the Navi, I hope they are at least on stilts.If Disney wanted Na'vi walking around, they could always go the Cirque du Soleil route
Cesar R M
Well-Known Member
Because stabbing, killing..etc.. and having entire armies decimate themselves is for kids.. right?
RoysCabin
Well-Known Member
In fairness, the original hobbit book was at least partially directed at a younger audience, and still included said stabbings and armies and whatnot, though Bilbo spent most of the final battle unconscious.
Marty Rotondo
Active Member
is anyone else thinking that after the unfufilled hype over at universal studios (i.e. gringotts and kong) that avatarland is going to be stupid and lame?
Me: oh look... Screens.
Mickey: yes but look how big the show building is!
Me: .......cool
Me: oh look... Screens.
Mickey: yes but look how big the show building is!
Me: .......cool
KingOfEpicocity
Well-Known Member
Well even if both of the rides suck, here's what I can pretty much garentee will be amazing. 1. The animatronics and 2. The landscaping of the land itself. Just look at the photo updates were getting. Imagine if Kong was an actual 12 acre skull island land. That's what this is, worst case scenario.
welcome to the board!
danlb_2000
Premium Member
Those two rides may have been over hyped within the fan community but they are by no means bad rides. As for Avatar, only one of the rides is going to be screen based. Even if the rides do disappoint the land is going to be spectacular.
RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
Then you're going to get the Disney can do style, but not substance. It's a reasonable enough counter argument to Universal can only do screens.
Marty Rotondo
Active Member
Not that screens are necessarily a bad thing, if you do it right. Take back to the future and the simpsons for example. Then put soarin clear on the opposite end of the spectrum. Maybe im just getting too old and cynical, but for the ammount of money they take from you it seems like they could be trying a little harder to be genuinely innovative. Probably just having an existential crisis though. Haha
brb1006
Well-Known Member
We will have to wait until it finally opens to finally get our judgements.
brb1006
Well-Known Member
So far the Flight attraction while screen-based is actually going for a new style. It won't be like Soarin or the other simulator attractions at Universal but judging by the description it's sounds difficult to picture until you actually ride it in person. This could be a good sign.
Last edited:
KingOfEpicocity
Well-Known Member
Especially with the ride vehicles that will apparently be actual banshees... And if it breathes and moves in any sort of interactive way, It might truly be innovative. or it may be like gringotts where the queue is better than the ride itself. Either way im plenty confident. Although i dont find soarin any worse than simpsons or BTTF...
BaconPancakes
Well-Known Member
Marty Rotondo
Active Member
hahaha, i just meant for disney world