Surely though (I'm not sure what policies stand in the USA) you have some kind of "Dangerous Dogs Act" enforced like we do in the UK? This would usually put a ban on any dogs (here it's mainly pitbulls) that are on the list from staying at a hotel due to legal reasons?
Until dogs are contributing to household funds and paying for their own vacations when they're older and choose where they would like to spend their money, your comparison is based on the definitional basis of "animal," and not what is relevant to the conversation.
From what Disney has released, there is no established breed or weight restriction.
Why is it not relevant when the discussion is whether dog's should be allowed on property and someone said no because they're animals? So are humans, so surely then that makes that persons statement irrelevant, no? This isn't a discussion on whether dogs can pay their own boarding fee or holiday cost, it's about whether people are happy for dogs to stay on Disney property.
You're trying to use the technicality of the definition of "animal" when obviously that was not what the OP was implying.Why is it not relevant when the discussion is whether dog's should be allowed on property and someone said no because they're animals? So are humans, so surely then that makes that persons statement irrelevant, no? This isn't a discussion on whether dogs can pay their own boarding fee or holiday cost, it's about whether people are happy for dogs to stay on Disney property.
I'm not bothered either way. Just letting this person know that the comment is irrelevant due to dogs AND humans being animals
Yes I have seen that, however as I stated, in the UK we have a Dangerous Dogs Act which prohibits someone from owning any dogs on this list. This would therefore make it illegal for any of these dogs to be on public property within the UK. Does the US not have something similar to this?
What it is is a glimpse into what is already happening even before dogs were allowed at some resorts. We can hope that now that there is an actual list of rules for dogs they will be enforced and since they have monetized the presence of dogs they will be more likely to crack down on those who sneak them in.
As stated, I don't care either way. There is no technicality involved when this is what a human being is. Simply stating facts.
Some more than others. Same as in every other thread that she takes over.
Some areas have these restrictions, but not all. Some are a state to state or even county to county basis.
I am also from the UK, so I'm not sure on US dog ownership rules, but as far as I know, there are no such restrictions.
Mark Buehrle retired in 2015, as a Blue Jay. He found his three years in Toronto to be “draining” without his family. Ontario also has a pit bull ban, so Mark left his family and family pet in Florida, where pit bulls are completely legal.
Bananas and eggplants are both technically fruits; nonetheless, only one of those is joining my peanut butter in a sandwich for lunch today.
There are no more bedspreads at Disney resorts. Pillows and runners are not changed.
I hope you are right. You are a lot more optimistic than I am. IMHO it’s much easier to enforce rules like no dogs on the furniture in a resort that bans all non-service dogs. Once you allow dogs in the lobby and common areas anyway it’s much more likely to have abuse and I also think some owners will see it as more of a grey area. It’s against the rules but look how cute my dog is, he’s not hurting anyone sitting on the couch. Unless they actually hire more CMs to enforce the rules with that extra cash coming in from the pet fees I don’t see it getting better.
Even at the resorts that allow dogs I don't believe they are allowed in lobbies or other common areas.
