WDS makes DCA look like DLP or the MK. Seriously, folks, a lot of people complain that DCA is lacking, but it is a complete park when compared to WDS. A lot of rides are off the shelf, but there is also some quality innovation and some great theming, none of which is present at WDS (with the possible exception of the auto show)
I felt Rock N Roller Coaster was themed nicely. Ok, so its a light show, but those lights were designed and synched up with the ride and are slightly random so your ride can be a little different each time you ride. ITs got a definate theme to it (making of a Rock video).
I've heard that it actually is a pleasant ride to go on. The exterior theming is horrible, but
the ride is allegedly very thrilling and somewhat disorienting. The ride's exterior certainly isn't very inviting.
Walt on the partner statue always show the exit in every park
This is true. However, I'm willing to bet that there isn't anything magical about the W&M statue at WDS. At WDW and DL, you have the castle behind the statue...and when the fireworks show is running, it sends a shiver down your spine.
Was it a smaller park? Yes, but all Disney parks start off small and grow over time.
Not true.
You've got to admit that the "original" parks (DL, MK, TDL, DLP)
were all pretty well equipped.
Here's the thing though. The secondary parks were all reasonably well done too. Epcot was loaded with attractions and details. TDS is one of the best parks in the world. DCA, while somewhat cheap, does have a lot of attractions, innovation, and is very well themed. WDS, on the other hand, doesn't offer much in any aspect.
Also consider the status of parks after 2 years. 2 years after MGM opened, we had Star Tours, MuppetVision, HISTK Playground, and Beauty and the Beast added to the roster. AK added Asia within 2 years. What has WDS added? Nothing
Another thing to note is the level of theming in the parks. Parks like AK and MGM survived because they were immersive and extremely well themed. AK transports you to lush jungles, the heart of Africa, and primeval forests. MGM sends you to the golden age of Hollywood, and New York. Where does WDS take you?
The WDS studios is supposed to be like you are walking into a real studio whereas MGM is based around the "hollywood that never was" concept.
MGM combines both themes, and more. When MGM first opened, it was supposed to be like a real working movie studio. The backstage tour took you through actual soundstages and showed you how movies were made. There was a real focus on the production of movies. Of course, Hollywood Blvd and Echo Lake provide the fun, themed golden age of Hollywood.
For example, at MGM you have a 1930's hotel next to a current day recording studio...huh? Doesn't make thematic sense.
I believe that this is because of the power requirements for both TOT and RNRC. Both rides require a lot of power, and a power subsystem was already built for TOT. Since RNRC needs a lot of power too, it was placed right next door to TOT.
There are parts of MGM today that are just as "industrial" and "unthemed" as the WDS.
Those areas are called the backlot
The walkway where the ABC Commisary is located is pretty bland.
Sort of. There are some small details to look at. It is also a minor, less-travelled walkway.
What about the eatery area by the "Honey, I shrunk the Kids Playset?" Some of the walls are just made out of metal sheets.
It's in the backlot area. This is the part of the park that's supposed to look like a real studio (to use your defense of WDS)
You're missing the big picture. Every park has flaws in some area. You're using small, isolated examples from other parks to defend what apparantly happens on a grand scale at WDS.
Whew
