@WDW1974, Any thoughts on this?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/peterlauria/why-bob-iger-may-not-leave-disney-in-2016
It's interesting how much of a cheerleading tone this article (and most other media outlets) take for Iger. He's really becoming the quite the paradox. His leadership as CEO has been extremely successful for Disney's stock price, and clearly many shareholders are pleased with his performance. There's no denying that the Animation Studios have seen a tremendous turnaround during his reign, and that acquisitions like Marvel and Pixar have been very profitable, so to some extent it's easy to see why shareholders love him. That 99% support figure at the shareholder's meeting is very telling.
But at the same time they seem blind to his disturbing spending habits, from the relatively quiet (but significant) failures with MM+ and Disney Interactive, to much more public debacles resulting from a film studio built exclusively on expensive tentpoles (Prince of Persia, John Carter, Lone Ranger, Mars Need Moms). And many on this site justifiably take issue with his lack of interest in theme parks, reliance on sequels and branding (successful though the animation studios have been, their movies have also added five princesses to the toy line-up in the last five years - the first five princesses debuted over 54 years), and in general little patience with genuinely creative ideas. The problem is that while Eisner's creative failures led to financial failures as well, Iger's creative failures seem to always be masked by successes in other divisions (e.g. John Carter being quickly covered up with the Avengers, which does little to support the central Disney brand).
As a result, the stock price soars while the creative integrity of the company suffers.