No, it is not just a difference of who approves. Reedy Creek Improvement District enforces a different building code. It has a different documentation process. Any projects in process will have to be changed, all of which will cost money.
The power plant is owned by RCID. Reedy Creek Energy Services is just the company that operates the facility.
Ah, apologies - I see it on the map now in yellow.
I'm not talking about the bill. I'm referring to them getting rid of RCID
"Retaliation" under Title VII is a statutorily created cause of action. There's no "retaliation" cause of action created by the 1st Amendment; a government action is either constitutional or unconstitutional under the 1st Amendment.
I addressed this in the first sentence of my reply to you. I’m not sure what I can add.
"Rerail" I like that term. Too bad there is no time out or going to neutral corners to cool off. The Disney business model is going to be modified as is the County's management of it's jurisdiction. So "rerail" is very descriptive.Because both sides are being used/abused. Yes, parents should have a say in their kids' education/school programming. But, is there any real question about the timing/motive of this legislation given it's proponents/sponsors within the government? This now extends to the response from these same political figures in light of Disney's position (whether you agree with it or not). These folks are being quite direct about what this is about and it sucks that this is still a thing.
The concerns from our peers in the LGBTQ communities are legitimate. Hasn't exactly been a picnic for these folks historically speaking, wouldn't you agree? So the fact that there would be concern and pushback on something that could be a potential slippery slope going backwards for this community is understandable in my estimation.
Both positions are legitimate but the power brokers are pulling the strings and plotting people against each other. Do I have the solution? Heck no. But I will point out bad faith on all sides and encourage the working together with others if even they are adamantly opposed because I do know this... What we are doing is not working.
Now, it could potentially rerail Disney in very profound ways. Which is why we are all here.
DeSantis was on Fox last night gloating.
That may be the point…but that assumes more savvy than I’m willing to give
Considering what they just did to Split Oak (and Little Econ, and about 5 additional examples lately), when it comes to conservation I have no faith in Orange specifically. I have more faith in Osceola, but not much.
A change of name may be in its future, same facility / operation / company, just a surface refresh.
The hostile business environment in Ca and Anaheim has not changed. TWDC is between a rock and a hard place.
That particular poster has some weirdly intense dislike of Disney and seem to be an evangelist for that cause. The logic according to which they criticise Disney changes to suit the particular thread, but they've made it clear they prefer basically every other theme and amusement park out there and have spent a lot of time trying to convince Disney fans they should too. The "love" reaction to every post forecasting rough times ahead for Disney is completely in character.
I disagree…but don’t want to tangent on why…
Because the how and why matters, not just the end result. We wouldn’t have laws if it didn’t.
No posters opinions, the dissolution of RCID nor any politics are necessary to get visitors and guests to prefer other amusement parks more. B.C. and his cronies are doing an effective job of that.
