I posted this in another thread, but it is probably better suited here.
I've heard some anecdotal evidence that some DVC members who had booked studios at the Poly were being upgraded to bungalows, because not enough bungalows were being sold via DVC or cash. If true, I'm wondering which of the following it could be attributed to:
1. A lack of immediate demand; meaning the current number of large point contract holders expect three bedroom accommodations and are not using their points for the two bedroom bungalows (which are the same number of points as the grand Floridian three bedroom grand villas.) In this situation, a few more months of Poly specific sales should stop the surplus.
2. DVC has found the ceiling for what consumers are willing to pay for two bedroom accommodations. This may have an impact on the current wilderness lodge project.
3. The reports of such upgrades are malarkey; there is no man behind the curtain.
Any first hand or expert info would be appreciated
I've heard some anecdotal evidence that some DVC members who had booked studios at the Poly were being upgraded to bungalows, because not enough bungalows were being sold via DVC or cash. If true, I'm wondering which of the following it could be attributed to:
1. A lack of immediate demand; meaning the current number of large point contract holders expect three bedroom accommodations and are not using their points for the two bedroom bungalows (which are the same number of points as the grand Floridian three bedroom grand villas.) In this situation, a few more months of Poly specific sales should stop the surplus.
2. DVC has found the ceiling for what consumers are willing to pay for two bedroom accommodations. This may have an impact on the current wilderness lodge project.
3. The reports of such upgrades are malarkey; there is no man behind the curtain.
Any first hand or expert info would be appreciated
