Yes! This would be my plan! We really enjoyed Sanaa lunch (the prices are lower at lunch as well) and Boma dinner.I'm getting the impression if I want to try Sanaa, might as well do it during daylight. Try the Indian food AND see the animals.
I've done Boma for breakfast but not dinner.
I've always said that Sanaa is my favorite of the non-signature restaurants, and if I were looking for one with more refined food quality with a less noisy/less crowded atmosphere, I'd pick Sanaa. However, if you would prefer a larger variety of foods that are still a good quality for a buffet, Boma is still a decent choice.
I've been to both for dinner and I have been to Boma for breakfast as well.
I've always said that Sanaa is my favorite of the non-signature restaurants, and if I were looking for one with more refined food quality with a less noisy/less crowded atmosphere, I'd pick Sanaa. However, if you would prefer a larger variety of foods that are still a good quality for a buffet, Boma is still a decent choice.
I LOVED Boma for breakfast when I was there last, so a breakfast at Boma and dinner at Sanaa (going early enough that there's light) would be my favorite combo.
I agree with the above. Sanaa is churning out top notch food. It would be a great choice even without the animal view. And I will point out that the animal view is hit and miss anyway depending on where you are seated. However, the one time we did have a table by the windows at dusk, the view was amazing and definitely enhanced the experience.
Boma has long been a favorite of mine, but it's a more harried experience. I love trying all the different foods, but there's always that element of other people jumping in front of you on the buffet, or navigating around all the tables/chairs or whatever. I also find that just when I find that food that I just love on the buffet, I'm full! I find it to be more about trying a lot of things than eating any one thing, if that makes sense. It is noisier and bigger and more relaxed, but less relaxing.
Neither is a bad choice. If you're considering breakfast at Boma, it's really good as well, though just a shade different from your standard breakfast buffet. There are a handful of more exotic choices, but it's pretty familiar.
I totally agree with everything Contraiwise mentioned above about both restaurants.
Following-up on the "seeing animals while you eat" aspect, we were not seated near a window at Sanaa so the animals were not really visible to us, but that didn't detract from enjoying the meal in any way (though I'm sure it would make for a lovely bonus if we had been).
Just before entering Sanaa there is a walkway that sort of jets out into the hotel's savanna; we were able to enjoy walking out on it and seeing and watching the animals both before and after our meal, so we didn't feel like we were missing out on that experience by not being by the window during the meal.
Decisions, decisions. You people aren't making it easy!
I'd stick to Boma for dinner and do Sanaa for lunch another day.
I decided it would be one of the two. After a four drive and checking into All Star Music, my thinking was just to stay in the area. Can't go into any parks the evening of 4/21 (blocked out on Silver Pass). And didn't want to make the effort to drive to DS. Right now, it's Boma.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.