incredible, management should see these because they have no idea how beautiful the park originally was.
As an owner of a legacy photo, I don't want them moved. However, if they were moved to DS and added to the back story as the founders of DS, then it would be a great idea. We purchased our photo on our honeymoon and look at it on each of our 4 to 5 trips a year.Just getting rid of the tombstones and those sunshade things....and planting a few strategic trees would go a long way.
It is still a beautiful park...just being covered by a few pieces of carp.
You're breaking my heart, Martin!
Was the Hidden Mickey caused by the fountain and the two ponds intentional on WED's part?
That's the EPCOT Center I remember: huge and gorgeous, with tranquil paths leading to impressive, immersive rides. I concede the park needed some thrills to balance the collection of slow-moving Omnimovers, but the updates went too far and stripped many of the park's successful qualities too.
The only intentional hidden hub Mickey was at Disney-MGM Studios. But you're not far off. The practice of inserting hidden Mickeys began with Epcot. WDI added them to MK and DL rides in subsequent updates.Was the Hidden Mickey caused by the fountain and the two ponds intentional on WED's part?
I will say aesthetics-wise Epcot will likely be looking MUCH better than now in a few years. The most important part, It's THEME will likely be compromised, maybe beyond repair. Personally I would take lousy aesthetics but a solid theme over great aesthetics with a sub-par theme.incredible, management should see these because they have no idea how beautiful the park originally was.
The ever-useful Passport to Dreams blog did a nice beginning look at that a number of years ago: the shift from the more "sterile" (not meant in a bad way) Modernism of the 80s into the bright, attention-grabbing colors of the Postmodern 90s aesthetic. http://passport2dreams.blogspot.com/2007/11/epcots-modern-aesthetic.html
Or we could have both, like the park did for its first ten years.I will say aesthetics-wise Epcot will likely be looking MUCH better than now in a few years. The most important part, It's THEME will likely be compromised, maybe beyond repair. Personally I would take lousy aesthetics but a solid theme over great aesthetics with a sub-par theme.
That would be nice but not realistic with the Bobs in charge.Or we could have both, like the park did for its first ten years.
Why can't they move them to the walkway from the bus loop to the entrance...Along the path there are lovelty trees these could be tucked into...and you could still look at your photo...As an owner of a legacy photo, I don't want them moved. However, if they were moved to DS and added to the back story as the founders of DS, then it would be a great idea. We purchased our photo on our honeymoon and look at it on each of our 4 to 5 trips a year.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.