It makes them look desperate to show something inflated (pr staged) to try to shift the negative opinion.Yeah. Who does that?
Maybe someone who has a proverbial gun pointed at their head?
I suspect the "customers are always right" approach trumps a poor college kid program. Since.. its a revolving door right?In theory, yes. But are the coordinators and managers going to back the cast members in a situation like that?
They could have offered him more than that.But that's like offering someone with a big juicy steak dinner with all the fixins', a couple of quickly forgotten peanuts instead.
It may totally be the case, but I'm not ready to jump to that conclusion because it fits in with the already shaky narrative.
careful, on various forums/websites.. people have started to warn that the hottopic jewerly is low quality and might contain chemicals (in the silver) and even lead with paint on.You just need to know where to wear it. They have the clothing "line" of several items at Hot Topic - the dresses are cute, the jewelry is heinous and not over the top goth - not bad:
http://m.hottopic.com/hottopic/PopCulture/TV/OrphanBlack/FashionCollection.jsp
How many exposés are written with direct confirmation from the accused? If there are high enough people in Disney who want this to get out why aren't they will to actually talk to someone who could get it out? The Frozen Ever After story was only exclusive for a few hours.@AEfx i'm sorry, but you couldn't be more off base on your assessment of the china for frozen trade.
what is fritz going to write about on china without some kind of cooperation from disney? a story, which -- while probing and in the spirit of what good and fair journalism is supposed to look like -- would have been met with a "TWDC declined to comment on this story" and would have alienated the WSJ from one of the largest media companies in the world.
instead, he gets an exclusive with unprecedented level of access to plans for a WDW attraction that many mainstream consumers care about, which has driven TONS of traffic WSJ.com's way (remember, that's the modern day media currency). and the journal can justify it because it keeps them in disney's good graces, it financially behooves them, and "eh, will our readers care about this china thing anyway?"
That sort of bribery would make for another great story that does not need traditional outlets to be told.They could have offered him more than that.
like free stuff on parks, free travel..etc..
I mean, that already happened.. didnt it?
ITA. I would pay the entrance fee just to ride El Toro again. It's THAT good.I'm sorry you are missing out on El Toro, probably one of the best rides not only in the park but potentially in the USA. At least Nitro is always running
Disney Nipple?Yeah, Apney sounds like a disease...I'd go with Dipple, LOL.
isnt that a normal day for him?Overly agressive, threats on twitter, bad mouthing this site on twitter...
careful, on various forums/websites.. people have started to warn that the hottopic jewerly is low quality and might contain chemicals (in the silver) and even lead with paint on.
Too much fruit?whoops,did I __________ out loud????
How many exposés are written with direct confirmation from the accused? If there are high enough people in Disney who want this to get out why aren't they will to actually talk to someone who could get it out? The Frozen Ever After story was only exclusive for a few hours.
Iger has continued many of the worst practices from the Eisner years and the obsession to strip mine characters to death continues to pervade the company. While the sequels may be made in house now under better leadership, the company still wants to make sure it milks every udder until it bleeds. That's not how you keep these characters evergreen, but it's a great way to turn the public against the characters they loved (see Frozen and Cars).But hey, credit where credit is due - we have to give him props for all those classic films made during that period, too - Pocahontas 2, Lion King 2, Cinderella 2, Lady and the Tramp 2, Hunchback 2, Little Mermaid 2, 101 Dalmatians 2...you know, back when Disney was all about originality before Darth Iger the Acquirer came in and mucked it all up.
It makes them look desperate to show something inflated (pr staged) to try to shift the negative opinion.
@AEfx i'm sorry, but you couldn't be more off base on your assessment of the china for frozen trade.
what is fritz going to write about on china without some kind of cooperation from disney? a story, which -- while probing and in the spirit of what good and fair journalism is supposed to look like -- would have been meth with a "TWDC declined to comment on this story" and would have alienated the WSJ from one of the largest media companies in the world.
instead, he gets an exclusive with unprecedented level of access to plans for a WDW attraction that many mainstream consumers care about, which has driven TONS of traffic WSJ.com's way (remember, that's the modern day media currency). and the journal can justify it because it keeps them in disney's good graces, it financially behooves them, and "eh, will our readers care about this china thing anyway?"
On the other hand, this is likely the course Fritz went through:it's not about confirmation. it's all about access. no way the journal is going to alienate disney unless they absolutely have to.
this is likely the course fritz went through:
talked to '74 and others > went to TWDC corporate comms > was told "we're just not going to talk about that, and...off the record...those claims are greatly exaggerated anyway, but what we CAN tell you about as an exlcusive is..."
and all of a sudden the journal has a story with mass appeal, and they file away the sources on the china stuff. it doesn't matter how long it was exclusive for. every single post, including almost every blogger, is linking back to the journal because it's the original sourced report. more clicks = higher ad rates. higher ad rates = more $.
Normal people don't even know Disney is building a park in Shanghai.What negative opinion?
Remember, we're talking about normal people here, not Disney fanatics.
Absolutely not the case....Fritz had all ready been given the Frozen Ever After exclusive prior to any contact from "74 and others.
Bonus points for using a Sherlock gif.This is basically me every time I sit down to get through the 100 pages I've missed in this thread since the last time I looked:
So I take it you've ruled out coincidence?Absolutely not the case.
I know with some certainty that Fritz was given the Frozen info very recently.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.