Yeah, the article is typical Jim Hill style. However, if you can get passed the slant, there is some interesting information in that article. Most of what he says was dissused by the "dweebs" in the last two weeks though.
The most disturbing thing is this.. (If what he says is true of course) "To be brutally honest here, unless "Reign if Fire" -- this year's would-be summer blockbuster from Walt Disney Studios - is an out-and-out smash, it's pretty damned unlikely that this long promised expansion area for Disney's Animal Kingdom is ever going to make it off WDI's drawing board."
This is why BK should have no movie tie in. Even if the movie is a hit, the attraction is still 3-4 years away. Most people will probably forgotten about a summer "popcorn flick" by then.
Jim sure does a great job of repackaging other peoples information, and selling it as his own (complete with his anti-Disney opinions of course!)
