DAK 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

KDM31091

Well-Known Member
I know that at this point it’s not going to likely change, but it baffles me that Disney finds it more reasonable to demolish/ replace Dinoland instead of adding to a park with so few attractions as it is. There’s no reason we couldn’t have Tropical Americas as an addition, and they could also improve Dinoland.

I hope at the very least we are given ample warning with closures, as sometimes not much is given.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I know that at this point it’s not going to likely change, but it baffles me that Disney finds it more reasonable to demolish/ replace Dinoland instead of adding to a park with so few attractions as it is. There’s no reason we couldn’t have Tropical Americas as an addition, and they could also improve Dinoland.

I hope at the very least we are given ample warning with closures, as sometimes not much is given.

In reality that is exactly what should have happened.

Not only is it cheaper to just replace something that is already a larger ticket attraction that we are seeing more frequently, staffing is going to continue to struggle.

So projections have staffing being an intense struggle before and of course while EPIC opens. By early 2025 you will see many things more desperate staffing mode. It is not just front of the line situation that the CP helps with. But big professional recruiting has gone on.
 

PREMiERdrum

Well-Known Member
It would require a massive expansion, since they'd have to develop the area between the existing park and Conservation Station too -- at least to the extent of having a walking path with bathrooms, snack stands, etc.
Given the way its squeezed between the safari and the trek - and with the high number of animal care facilities along Conservation Way - I'd be shocked to see them go this route. There are plenty of areas for expansion that wouldn't require this level of development or guest access risk.
 

Advisable Joseph

Well-Known Member
Given the way its squeezed between the safari and the trek - and with the high number of animal care facilities along Conservation Way - I'd be shocked to see them go this route. There are plenty of areas for expansion that wouldn't require this level of development or guest access risk.
There have been hints at this on the past, pre-pandemic:

An insider in the truest sense of the word once hinted the train could become part of a much bigger plan. Seems I remember it could be a resort or a new land. Certainly the train could create a much more immersive experience if they chose that option.
Also, @ToTBellHop has indicated there are plans to build north of Everest/Kali River IIRC.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Given the way its squeezed between the safari and the trek - and with the high number of animal care facilities along Conservation Way - I'd be shocked to see them go this route. There are plenty of areas for expansion that wouldn't require this level of development or guest access risk.

Completely agree -- I've been shooting this idea down for a while here.

They might eventually expand all the way up to Conservation Station, but I think that's a very long way off. It's just not feasible without a tremendous amount of work.

There have been hints at this on the past, pre-pandemic:


Also, @ToTBellHop has indicated there are plans to build north of Everest/Kali River IIRC.

That wouldn't get to Conservation Station, though, unless they built an expansion that essentially doubled the size of the current park (excluding the Safari).
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom