Creathir
Well-Known Member
Eisner understood that the customer mattered, that the experience, from all levels mattered. He understood a vision was needed to illicit the magic. Iger is just an empty suit, a salesman with no vision.So, the on-site resorts are running at 85% capacity, per Disney's own quarterly statements, and some people are claiming the sky would fall (aka. parks would be overrun with guests) if they were full?
![]()
Remember when there were things to do outside the parks, and they were also affordable? Golf. Parasailing. Watercraft rentals. Arcades. Pleasure Island. Downtown Disney with multiple things to do and experience, not just be a collection of shopping and restaurants. Dinner shows. Luaus. Those who designed the place designed it to be a "resort", not just a collection of theme parks with hotels. The previous guy running the company knew that and worked towards providing things everyone could enjoy, and expanded offerings. The current guy thought that idea was stupid and has worked to rid the place of those sorts of things ever since 2005. They both ran the company for roughly the same amount of time, which one is going to be remembered 20 years from now in a more positive light? I'm betting on the former, not the lesser. I mean, latter.
His direction is guided purely by selling more stock.