• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

When you think you've seen it all - this happened at Kilimanjaro Safaris

Status
Not open for further replies.

StarWarsGirl

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
What else should have happened?

I mean leaving aside the idea that the guy just did this as a joke. If the situation was that he just couldn't hold it any longer, either because he has some medical problem, the ride took longer than he thought it would, or there was a hold up in the ride itself which caused it to go longer...what do you think should have happened? He should have just peed himself on the jeep? Get himself wet, the people sitting around him, the vehicle itself, and now everyone has to finish the ride covered in pee? Sure he likely will and should be thrown out after, but honestly if the damn was bursting, was there a better option than going in a spot off to the side, not surrounded by animals, and not getting other visitors in the splash zone?
Women do it all the time, and our bladders are more sensitive, especially with the safari truck bumping up and down and up and down...

The solution was never, at any point, to get off a moving vehicle into an area with wild animals.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
What company standard requirements do you speak of? Typically, there are restraints due to dynamics of ride such as sudden stops from speed in case of E stop/where a body should hit based on ride's dynamic in case of a sudden stop, or forces it produces. There is some deterrent level to attractions, but Kilimanjaro has enough deterrent where this has not been a common issue.

Splash got them in a big refurb for obvious reasons and legal coverage because standing and leaning out/log hopping was a major issue for guests when vehicles would go closer together. So it made lawyer's happy.
 
Last edited:

tissandtully

Well-Known Member
What company standard requirements do you speak of? Typically, there are restraints due to dynamics of ride such as sudden stops from speed in case of E stop/where a body should hit based on ride's dynamic in case of a sudden stop, or forces it produces. There is some deterrent level to attractions, but Kilimanjaro has enough deterrent where this has not been a common issue.

Splash got them in a big refurb for obvious reasons and legal coverage because standing and leaning out/log hopping was a major issue for guests when vehicles would go closer together. So it made lawyer's happy.
Universal has a full containment policy, it's why SLOP has restraints that some people can't fit into for a slow-moving dark ride
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Women do it all the time, and our bladders are more sensitive, especially with the safari truck bumping up and down and up and down...

The solution was never, at any point, to get off a moving vehicle into an area with wild animals.

Most people would likely wet themselves and face some possible embarrassment before endangering operation, enjoyment and safety of others to that level.

This behavior in video is more stunt like and reminds me a lot of students in public school with oppositional defiance of just doing something because they physically bet they can.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Universal has a full containment policy, it's why SLOP has restraints that some people can't fit into for a slow-moving dark ride

That is not across the board. One of the company's most recent ventures is literally a moving attraction where you stand on a dot on a moving platform and wield lose toy weapons around.

Another, even more recent has you choosing to sit or stand where you interact with water targets.

It always depends on many things and is not an across the board policy.

Try again to someone that has not been with the company in design.
 

tissandtully

Well-Known Member
That is not across the board. One of the company's most recent ventures is literally a ride where you stand on a dot on a moving platform and wield lose toy weapons around.

Another, even more recent has you choosing to sit or stand where you interact with water targets.

It always depends on many things and is not an across the board policy.

Try again to someone that has not been with the company.
Uhhh, yeah, and if you get off the dot the ride stops. Literally the same philosophy. You ever been on that while another guest had a companion dog that sat down during the ride? Took us like 20 minutes to get through it cause it e-stopped every time the dog sat down. But you know everything, so, go ahead... I worked there too.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Uhhh, yeah, and if you get off the dot the ride stops. Literally the same philosophy. You ever been on that while another guest had a companion dog that sat down during the ride? Took us like 20 minutes to get through it cause it e-stopped every time the dog sat down. But you know everything, so, go ahead... I worked there too.

Not true at all in design. People mistand on those dots all day long.

But deflect the original point. There is no across the board policy. Look at Fyre Drill.
 

tissandtully

Well-Known Member
You cant be serious right now even remotely defending this…. Yes you do what he did you are exposing yourself to potentially children and adults seeing things you shouldnt be seeing in a Disney park not to mention just being an absolute moron and inconsiderate a - hole
Where do you see him exposing himself? So if I'm using a urinal in a public restroom and all anyone can see is my back, I am exposing myself? The takes in this thread range from reasonable to deranged, just like yours. I'm not defending him, I'm just saying your take is absolutely insane that he's exposing himself, read my other posts here.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
You cant be serious right now even remotely defending this…. Yes you do what he did you are exposing yourself to potentially children and adults seeing things you shouldnt be seeing in a Disney park not to mention just being an absolute moron and inconsiderate a - hole

And in the state of FL, you don't even have to have people witness it for it to face that potential charge. If it is in an area deemed touristy where people frequently pass, it can be pushed for that just on the chance it could have happened. True story.
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
What company standard requirements do you speak of? Typically, there are restraints due to dynamics of ride such as sudden stops from speed in case of E stop/where a body should hit based on ride's dynamic in case of a sudden stop, or forces it produces. There is some deterrent level to attractions, but Kilimanjaro has enough deterrent where this has not been a common issue.

Splash got them in a big refurb for obvious reasons and legal coverage because standing and leaning out/log hopping was a major issue for guests when vehicles would go closer together. So it made lawyer's happy.
That wasn't me you quoted. 🤷‍♂️
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Where do you see him exposing himself? So if I'm using a urinal in a public restroom and all anyone can see is my back, I am exposing myself? The takes in this thread range from reasonable to deranged, just like yours. I'm not defending him, I'm just saying your take is absolutely insane that he's exposing himself, read my other posts here.

The ride path of a theme park or area of public access is not the same as a restroom where by nature, privacy is expected. You know laws and decency the same way you know Universal's design policies.
 

bmr1591

Well-Known Member
Some of y'all haven't done a Disney 5K in Corral F. By the time you're actually on the course, the forest is flooded with people having to let loose because there aren't any porter potties around. And there are plenty of kids running that race. Is that indecent exposure?
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Some of y'all haven't done a Disney 5K in Corral F. By the time you're actually on the course, the forest is flooded with people having to let loose because there aren't any porter potties around. And there are plenty of kids running that race. Is that indecent exposure?

It could be, yes. Nothing is definite, but the point is it could be. Not likely. But the point is, it could be pressed for this.
 

Splash4eva

Well-Known Member
Where do you see him exposing himself? So if I'm using a urinal in a public restroom and all anyone can see is my back, I am exposing myself? The takes in this thread range from reasonable to deranged, just like yours. I'm not defending him, I'm just saying your take is absolutely insane that he's exposing himself, read my other posts here.

The potentially was suppose to go in front of expose…. Again as i said. When you pull an act like this you are potentially exposing yourself to other people. You are comparing a restroom. Where people are suppose to pee vs jumping off a safari ride and unzipping your fly and taking a whiz again potentially exposing yourself. This guy deserves to be banner for life and made an example out of. He wont and these actions will continue to happen because noon is held accountable. These forums are wild. A guy literally hops out of KS takes a pee on the bushes and people are trying to rationalize these actions. Smfh.
 

Splash4eva

Well-Known Member
And in the state of FL, you don't even have to have people witness it for it to face that potential charge. If it is in an area deemed touristy where people frequently pass, it can be pushed for that just on the chance it could have happened. True story.
The more you know. Thanks for that. Maybe let the person comparing this to peeing in a restroom about this…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom