Brian
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure that was a big problem for them, since SOG was pushing to maintain pedestrian access.keeps day guests from parking there for mk
I'm not sure that was a big problem for them, since SOG was pushing to maintain pedestrian access.keeps day guests from parking there for mk
The decisionmaking behind the crosswalk, and the conflicting interests of Disney and Shades of Green, were covered in the CFTOD's 'Report on Past Practices of the Reedy Creek Improvement District.'
The relevant portion is quoted below, and the full version is available at this link.
keeps day guests from parking there for mk
But surely if Disney wanted to, they could get theirThis report is very one-sided and... I'm sure that comes as no surprise to anyone here.
There is a 4-lane highway being built in front of SOG and GF. If you have been watching this site and have seen the roadway plans there will be roundabouts with no left-hand turns. A traffic light or crosswalk would not go on a highway. Other solutions were offered, but financially the cost was too high.
SOG offers bus transportation and even expanded transportation after the closer of the sidewalk. Guest can simply take a bus to the TTC and them walk or take the resort monorail to the poly.
OMG... did you know they actually make them pay for PARKING too?Apparently, that wasn't something they were willing to do when it came to the only resort on property dedicated to armed forces veterans and their families.
Did SoG make a formal request? How much of the construction costs did SoG offer to pay? It's kind of a one sided crossing. Guests of Disney resorts aren't allowed inside SoG. In other words such a bridge is, all but, exclusively for guests of SoG.But surely if Disney wanted to, they could get theiryesmenelected representatives on the RCID board to build them an overpass with municipal bonds. Apparently, that wasn't something they were willing to do when it came to the only resort on property dedicated to armed forces veterans and their families.
That's a valid point. Though it's not entirely a one-sided relationship, as SoG guests provide Disney with plenty of revenue via the lease payments the resort makes to Disney, as well as their patronage of the parks.Guests of Disney resorts aren't allowed inside SoG. In other words such a bridge is, all but, exclusively for guests of SoG.
How much $$$ do SoG guests spend in POLY restaurants and gift shops? Enough to justify the expense of building and maintaining a pedestrian bridge?That's a valid point. Though it's not entirely a one-sided relationship, as SoG guests provide Disney with plenty of revenue via the lease payments the resort makes to Disney, as well as their patronage of the parks.
That's irrelevant, as most SoG guests who utilized the crosswalk weren't exclusively going to the Polynesian or Grand Floridian. Maybe they stopped in for a meal, but that wasn't the main purpose of their crossing the street; they were continuing on to MK (mostly).How much $$$ do SoG guests spend in POLY restaurants and gift shops? Enough to justify the expense of building and maintaining a pedestrian bridge?
The land Shades of Green sits on is owned by Palm Hospitality, a Disney subsidiary. In terms of representation, Shades of Green had zero voting power in the district as they are not a landowner.The decisionmaking behind the crosswalk, and the conflicting interests of Disney and Shades of Green, were covered in the CFTOD's 'Report on Past Practices of the Reedy Creek Improvement District.'
The relevant portion is quoted below, and the full version is available at this link.
Did you stay there often?That's irrelevant, as most SoG guests who utilized the crosswalk weren't exclusively going to the Polynesian or Grand Floridian. Maybe they stopped in for a meal, but that wasn't the main purpose of their crossing the street; they were continuing on to MK (mostly).
Your seemingly insatiable contrarianism never ceases to amaze me.Did you stay there often?
You'd be surprised at how many do to save money. Two night's price difference pays my Lapu bill for a week. Just mine but stillYour seemingly insatiable contrarianism never ceases to amaze me.
No, I did not stay there often, and you know that. Logic would dictate, however, that if there are 55-75 people crossing that road per hour (per the report), not every single of one of them consider Polynesian their final destination. One would think that the world's most visited theme park, just a monorail's ride away from the Polynesian, would be their destination.
Do you think that the guests of SoG want so badly to be at Polynesian that they fly to Orlando and stay at a different resort just to be near it?
I didn't - that's why I asked. But your presumptions alluded to your inexperience with the resort.No, I did not stay there often, and you know that.
Logic would dictate, however, that if there are 55-75 people crossing that road per hour (per the report), not every single of one of them consider Polynesian their final destination. One would think that the world's most visited theme park, just a monorail's ride away from the Polynesian, would be their destination.
Do you think that the guests of SoG want so badly to be at Polynesian that they fly to Orlando and stay at a different resort just to be near it?
Guests of Disney are allowed to play golf at the 2 golf courses, though. So it's not accurate to say Disney guests aren't allowed on SOG property. I recall discussion at the time this was originally announced that Poly guests were annoyed they could no longer walk over to play golf as well.Did SoG make a formal request? How much of the construction costs did SoG offer to pay? It's kind of a one sided crossing. Guests of Disney resorts aren't allowed inside SoG. In other words such a bridge is, all but, exclusively for guests of SoG.
How much did SoG pay Reedy Creek? Property taxes? Fees in lieu of taxes.
.
We would often eat at poly. And stop and get dole whips. It also made for an easy access monorail crawl to the other resorts , which was nice on rest days. We didn't love the SOG restaurants, so we were far more likely to eat at the nearby Disney hotel restaurants.How much $$$ do SoG guests spend in POLY restaurants and gift shops? Enough to justify the expense of building and maintaining a pedestrian bridge?
SoG no longer contracts with Disney for transportation. SoG offers bus service to the TTC.That's irrelevant, as most SoG guests who utilized the crosswalk weren't exclusively going to the Polynesian or Grand Floridian. Maybe they stopped in for a meal, but that wasn't the main purpose of their crossing the street; they were continuing on to MK (mostly).
Do you think there are enough POLY golfers to justify building a pedestrian bridge?Guests of Disney are allowed to play golf at the 2 golf courses, though. So it's not accurate to say Disney guests aren't allowed on SOG property. I recall discussion at the time this was originally announced that Poly guests were annoyed they could no longer walk over to play golf as well.
I think there was enough use, and business that Disney got on either side, to make somehow allowing for access to continue worth it.Do you think there are enough POLY golfers to justify building a pedestrian bridge?
The two golf courses are not SOG property though. They are owned entirely by Disney.Guests of Disney are allowed to play golf at the 2 golf courses, though. So it's not accurate to say Disney guests aren't allowed on SOG property. I recall discussion at the time this was originally announced that Poly guests were annoyed they could no longer walk over to play golf as well.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.