It's kind of a silly argument because Nintendo isn't really an IP. It's like calling Paramount (or even Disney) an IP. Which technically they all are, but not really in this particular context.
The current Nintendo lands are mainly one IP (Mario), although Donkey Kong is kind of a separate thing despite being connected.
Just because people like one Nintendo IP (or multiple) doesn't mean they like ALL Nintendo IP; there are plenty of people who, e.g., love Mario Kart but couldn't care less about Zelda.
Oh all of Disney franchises(including Star Wars) are connected by a lot more than just Santa…(pulls down conspiracy theory board)All of Disney's franchises (except Star Wars) should be all in one category surpassing Pokeman. That's because they all are connect to be one universe connected by Christmas and Santa. Thus, it's the number one franchise.
I've pointed this out before, but those kind of general lists of franchise revenue are only about half the picture at best, especially when discussing something like potential theme park draw. There are far too many other variables beyond sheer revenue numbers (some of which are hard to quantify).
That should be self-evident considering Winnie the Pooh is third on that list. I'm not sure anyone thinks Winnie the Pooh is a bigger draw right now than a number of the things below it (including many things not listed). And then there's Anpanman, which is essentially a non-entity in the United States. You could list hundreds, if not thousands, of individual IPs that would make more sense than Anpanman for a US park.
Even ones that definitely are a draw, like Mario, aren't necessarily a bigger draw than some things below them. This is probably still true right now, but if you go back a decade HP was a much bigger get for a theme park land than Mario.
All of Disney's franchises (except Star Wars) should be all in one category surpassing Pokeman. That's because they all are connect to be one universe connected by Christmas and Santa. Thus, it's the number one franchise.
That should be self-evident considering Winnie the Pooh is third on that list. I'm not sure anyone thinks Winnie the Pooh is a bigger draw right now than a number of the things below it (including many things not listed).
Of course, that wasn’t what I meant to imply by any stretch. There needs to be a bit of normalization against the given market.
Some of these franchises are stronger for English audiences (Star Wars) and others are quite niche to the Japanese audience.
Pooh does have a surprising amount of reach amongst the Asian parks, but obviously is a franchise for littles. There’s also a reason Pooh is the one of the few things to feature at all six resorts. I don’t think it sends the domestic Disney adult hearts a flutter, but it’s also a lot closer to “Mickey”.
Making a lot of money in a transmedia fashion doesn’t mean something also translates well to a theme park setting. But that said, Nintendo has access to Disney-brand like properties in a way no other IP holder really does.
What this does ultimately get a good pulse of is merch potential.
Yeah, that's a weird one. I've always heard that Winnie the Pooh does great numbers because people buy merch for babies or when decorating nurseries. Definitely not a huge draw of a franchise, but weirdly, has a broader appeal for a reason completely unrelated to the media.
Nobody implied that at all... It's a collection of highest grossing media franchises, a starting point for discussion but not the end.Oh sure, I didn't think you were implying that.
But I do think some people get blinded by those numbers and assume bigger total revenue automatically equals better.
Nobody implied that at all... It's a collection of highest grossing media franchises, a starting point for discussion but not the end.
Open ceilings are usually more expensive compared to suspended ceiling tiles, making all the pipes and cabling neat then painting it properly costs more than just throwing it all up and hiding it behind ceiling tiles.View attachment 920039
View attachment 920040
Was just watching a tour of the Helios hotel and saw that they apparently didn't bother to build cover the ceiling of the hotel store. Seems like a bizarre oversight for one of their deluxe hotels, though not sure if there is any logic for this beyond saving some money?
Seems like an odd decision, then, given the aesthetic of the rest of the hotel.Open ceilings are usually more expensive compared to suspended ceiling tiles, making all the pipes and cabling neat then painting it properly costs more than just throwing it all up and hiding it behind ceiling tiles.
Open ceilings have been new and modern for at least 25 years so are quite standard really, makes the space feel more open and airy.
Is it open in the rest of the hotel? It’s about what I’d expect in the gift shopSeems like an odd decision, then, given the aesthetic of the rest of the hotel.
No it's not, which is what makes it odd. Usually the theming carries through to the gift shops, but for some reason in what is supposed to be one of their deluxe hotels they've gone with a mall store aesthetic.Is it open in the rest of the hotel? It’s about what I’d expect in the gift shop
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.