I've pointed this out before, but those kind of general lists of franchise revenue are only about half the picture at best, especially when discussing something like potential theme park draw. There are far too many other variables beyond sheer revenue numbers (some of which are hard to quantify).
That should be self-evident considering Winnie the Pooh is third on that list. I'm not sure anyone thinks Winnie the Pooh is a bigger draw right now than a number of the things below it (including many things not listed). And then there's Anpanman, which is essentially a non-entity in the United States. You could list hundreds, if not thousands, of individual IPs that would make more sense than Anpanman for a US park.
Even ones that definitely are a draw, like Mario, aren't necessarily a bigger draw than some things below them. This is probably still true right now, but if you go back a decade HP was a much bigger get for a theme park land than Mario.