Tokyo Disneyland Resort Expansion

cheezbat

Well-Known Member
wouldn't Chapek be pretty happy about OLC footing the bill for the R&D on new IP based attractions that can be easily cloned everywhere?

Also I don't understand why people are acting so surprised that the expansion is heavily character based when it's been proven that the patrons of TDR are crazy about them. I mean, they shelved a great original nighttime show in favor of the IP-heavy Fantasmic! for TDS. It makes all the sense that future expansions will capitalize on characters rather than original attractions, especially now that the company is producing new contemporary hits.
Great. So Tokyo can have all the IP tied attractions, and anything original planned for those parks can come to WDW instead! 😄

(Ahh...if only it were that easy!)
 

tonymu

Premium Member
I don’t know where you get the idea that Pan and Frozen will be clones - absolutely nothing in Tokyo’s recent history lends any credence to this idea. Monsters and Pooh sure aren’t clones of their counterparts in other parks. I find it wildly unlikely that TDL is going to reproduce a Frozen ride that was jammed into a facility that was already too small. And why would you think they are going to clone a Pan ride they already have?

Imagineerings runaway budgets are a definite issue, but this seems like a really weird place to get hung up on them.
I just read somewhere else that says all the attractions will be new for DisneySea. No clones.
 

RandySavage

Well-Known Member
That hotel art is not encouraging. MiraCosta is the supreme themed hotel, architecturally, not just because it was executed so well, but because each of its segments is in similar scale to the real locales (Venice, Portofino, Tuscany). It's as good as it gets.

Trying to create a fairytale castle-themed hotel of that scale always results in something really awkward and schlocky:
model-of-the-castle-hotel.jpg


It's theoretically possible to do it right - to design and build a grand palace (hotel) that feels like it could actually exist in a romanticized 18th century fairytale, just as MiraCosta really feels like old Italy. But no one's ever come close to doing so - even in concept - as far as I know - mainly because structures from that time period, even palaces, can't easily be remodeled into large resort hotels (e.g., sliding glass doors for guest rooms)

The hotel art is reminiscent of all the mediocre efforts in China to build castle hotels. Surprise me, Disney. Please.


EDIT: I found a sketch by the great John Horney that shows a Chateau hotel concept that looks a little more promising (like a Loire Valley chateau in scale). Sadly, Horney, Jafari and the other great hotel designers are long gone from Disney. The best you can hope for Disney hotels in this era are Bs at best., like Explorers Lodge or SDL Hotel.
Chateau Resort 1.png
 
Last edited:

fradz

Well-Known Member
So I had an interesting thought this morning. Look at the aerial map of the resort. We have the Fantasyland expansion in TDL. This "kind of Fantasyland" expansion in TDS. Look how close they are, they are almost... connected...
Now, also look at where the new extra luxurious hotel is located (and which, as a reminder, will be the most luxurious hotel of the resort)

My guess, and it's not extremely far-fetched, is that both parks will be a direct walk-in for guests of that resort. They will get, regardless of how many days they are staying, automatically the 2parks per day tickets.

Note that this might even have consequences on regular guests, think Universal Orlando style with a direct link between the 2 parks (via an upcharge, of course). Only here, it will be through Fantasyland, not Harry Potter.

What do you guys think?




32P2Hw4.jpg
 
Last edited:

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
HKDL and Paris are getting Frozen boat rides. How would one not think the Tokyo attraction would be unique like PHH, maybe the best of the bunch like Splash, but certainly not unique. SHDL just built a high tech PPF, you don’t think clone happy Chappie wouldn’t port that over; remember PPF is techinically a boat ride.

The rides are not clones according to the official OLC press release.

I’m not sure where this Chapek bias is driven from. I hate clones, but we are running far less clones these days than other historical points with Disney. TDO aside of course. IP excessively, yes.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Tangled is super weak on the appropriateness for Disney Sea. Neverland with a pirate focus doesn’t bother me, it ticks the exploration/adventure boxes. The Scandinavian/frozen port is ok...

But Tangled will be the most unique. *Shrug*.

I’m far more bothered by the years and years of stagnation with plastered character celebrations people have attributed to OLC ‘investing’. Happy celebration version 7.6 new parade fun time. More like treading water for the last decade.

The hotel looks like another garish Tokyo creation. Especially now that Bayside station is really officially in the bubble. Just pay 25% of the price for equivalent access.

This is actually substance though, and a lot of it. I’m unapologetically excited! Even if the Disneyfication of Disney Sea comes to a head. It’s unfortunately what OLC and their local fans want.
 

the.dreamfinder

Well-Known Member
That hotel art is not encouraging. MiraCosta is the supreme themed hotel, architecturally, not just because it was executed so well, but because each of its segments is in similar scale to the real locales (Venice, Portofino, Tuscany). It's as good as it gets.

Trying to create a fairytale castle-themed hotel of that scale always results in something really awkward and schlocky:
model-of-the-castle-hotel.jpg


It's theoretically possible to do it right - to design and build a grand palace (hotel) that feels like it could actually exist in a romanticized 18th century fairytale, just as MiraCosta really feels like old Italy. But no one's ever come close to doing so - even in concept - as far as I know - mainly because structures from that time period, even palaces, can't easily be remodeled into large resort hotels (e.g., sliding glass doors for guest rooms)

The hotel art is reminiscent of all the mediocre efforts in China to build castle hotels. Surprise me, Disney. Please.


EDIT: I found a sketch by the great John Horney that shows a Chateau hotel concept that looks a little more promising (like a Loire Valley chateau in scale). Sadly, Horney, Jafari and the other great hotel designers are long gone from Disney. The best you can hope for Disney hotels in this era are Bs at best., like Explorers Lodge or SDL Hotel.
View attachment 290281
Is John Horney still alive?
 

RandySavage

Well-Known Member
So I had an interesting thought this morning. Look at the aerial map of the resort. We have the Fantasyland expansion in TDL. This "kind of Fantasyland" expansion in TDS. Look how close they are, they are almost... connected...
Now, also look at where the new extra luxurious hotel is located (and which, as a reminder, will be the most luxurious hotel of the resort)

My guess, and it's not extremely far-fetched, is that both parks will be a direct walk-in for guests of that resort. They will get, regardless of how many days they are staying, automatically the 2parks per day tickets.

Note that this might even have consequences on regular guests, think Universal Orlando style with a direct link between the 2 parks (via an upcharge, of course). Only here, it will be through Fantasyland, not Harry Potter.

What do you guys think?




32P2Hw4.jpg
This was also an early thought of mine. Toontown is problematic to this idea. Logistically, one would think the hotel would be on the outskirts of the development, versus in-between like you've shown. But that would negate entering either park only through the hotel and instead require direct park to park access. I can see the economic benefit of the having the two park entrance for the hotel, but not necessarily the park-to-park link. Should be interesting to see what happens.
 

the.dreamfinder

Well-Known Member
This was also an early thought of mine. Toontown is problematic to this idea. Logistically, one would think the hotel would be on the outskirts of the development, versus in-between like you've shown. But that would negate entering either park only through the hotel and instead require direct park to park access. I can see the economic benefit of the having the two park entrance for the hotel, but not necessarily the park-to-park link. Should be interesting to see what happens.
I wonder if this project shares ideas pitched for TDL NFL and they didn’t want to tear down Toontown or something? Working around Toontown seems to have limited the ambition of how radically they could change that land’s design and layout.
 

Jones14

Well-Known Member
Frozen and Pan work great for me. Tangled is definitely the weakest, but it seems to be the smallest of the three, almost as though they realized they had a little bit of empty space and wanted to fill it out with something that would visually transition well to and from the other two.
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
For Tokyo attractions, is all the dialogue in Japanese or do they have at least one character speak English?
Yeah all attractions have Japanese dialogue including parades and shows. Tokyo at one point had English dialogue for Castle shows back in the 1990's. Unlike Paris where they started doing English and French dialogue for shows and a few parades sometime in the 2000's.
 

Disneylover152

Well-Known Member
That budget, ¥250 Billion, or $2.5 Billion. WDI has gone off the f-in rails. Four attractions, one to two of them possibly clones, three restaurants and a 400 room hotel. On what planet should it cost that much.

The $2.5 billion is going to the entire expansion. Meaning the new parking structure, the new hotel, Neverland, Tangled Area, and Frozen Area, Soarin', Beauty and the Beast Area, the theatre in Fantasyland, the new Minnie experience, and the redesign of the E-tickets (Small World, Jungle Cruise, Pirates).
 

The_Mesh_Hatter

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I'll take a stab at things.

Hets7QR.jpg


Let's begin with the hotel. The style is fantasy, but the design would be equally at home just beyond Jasmine's Flying Carpets on the outskirts of Arabian Coast. I believe the hotel will separate this new land from the rest of TDS; meaning that access to the new land is by going directly under the hotel.

sRlOz6R.jpg


I believe the series of archways to the right is the passage that will connect this port with the rest of TDS. I suspect the angle is taken from within the new port since we can see the large gift shop the press release talks about to the left of the archways.

To begin my map, I considered where street access to the hotel might come from. Ideally, the entrance would be closer to the front end of the resort to minimize congestion on the perimeter road. However, automobile traffic flow is not as big of a concern as it is for the city of Anaheim. Given the proximity to the monorail loop, I feel comfortable placing the hotel where I did. My plan does require the Bayside Station to be moved down. Operationally, I think the resort line could handle the change.

zdQUCTY.jpg


JoU30yk.jpg


(1) is the Frozen ride. Things are pretty tight in this location. So, perhaps it will be an upgraded version of the EPCOT attraction, hidden behind a more elaborate show building. The description is: "She has since opened the castle gates so that Guests can freely visit the Kingdom. Located here will be a heartwarming attraction that tells the story of Elsa and her beloved sister, Anna. Guests will board boats and experience the sisters’ heartfelt journey while enjoying iconic songs from the film and encountering surprising thrills." That sure sounds similar to the EPCOT ride.

The Frozen restaurant (a TSR I imagine) and Snuggly Duckling (QSR?) should share the same facilities. I labeled that F&Bx2.

(2) is the Tangled boat ride.
rPRuxm7.jpg

"Guests will board gondolas for a romantic boat tour of Rapunzel’s “best day ever” as she journeys with Flynn to the lantern festival. Countless flickering lanterns illuminate the attraction’s climactic scene while Rapunzel and Flynn sing an iconic song from the film, building to an unforgettable finale."

The concept art suggests the boat ride will go outside at some point, perhaps immediately at the beginning of things, before going behind the waterfall into the show building. The ride system seems similar to the Avatar boat ride, and the description evokes that ride as well. I would expect this to be another solid D ticket with about 3-4 minutes of material in the showbuilding.

Lastly, we come to the Peter Pan area, which is going to be the bulk of the experience. The official press release describes 2 attractions, but that isn't counting the many walk through's that are sure to be there (Skull Rock + Pirate Ship). (3) on my map is the E ticket of the land. From the descriptions, the Pan ride sounds like the headliner. Let's just assume that the Peter Pan ride as we know it is out of the picture (Maybe the TDL PP will stay, maybe it will be converted into a Poppins ride that preserves the "Flying over London" experience). Either way, this ride is definitely not taking you to London. I agree with Randy that this could use Shanghai's Pirates technology. I would expect this to be the longest and highest capacity fo the ride.

ZGPvMkK.jpg

I put (4) as the Pixie ride. It would be the obligatory spinner of the land. Perhaps it will be lifted from the abandoned New Fantasyland 1.0 plans. Or perhaps, the spinner will be a new ride system, given this will come a few years after the Big Hero 6 spinner opens in TDL.

In summary, I believe the roster will be as follows:

1. Frozen Ever After [D] (~5 minutes)
2. Tangled Gondolas [D] (~4.5 minutes)
3. Neverland Adventure [E] (6 minutes)
4. Pixie Hollow (2 minutes)

...and then, 2 QSR's and 1 TSR.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom