I'd imagine it is full of horror stories. No one on the TBA team inspired confidence in their abilities to competently complete something like this.I will be interested to hear Baxter’s take on this.
I'd imagine it is full of horror stories. No one on the TBA team inspired confidence in their abilities to competently complete something like this.I will be interested to hear Baxter’s take on this.
I'd imagine it is full of horror stories. No one on the TBA team inspired confidence in their abilities to competently complete something like this.
The AA team, as usual, did exceptional work. WDI still excels here. But, the best figures are so expensive that we can’t actually get rides with dozens of actual AAs any more.I'd imagine it is full of horror stories. No one on the TBA team inspired confidence in their abilities to competently complete something like this.
Most popular ride? Did anyone ever rope drop Splash? Did Splash’s lightning lanes sell out before all the other rides on Genie+?
Yeah -- the WDW POV video only has 373k views. That's obviously not nothing, but it's a tiny percentage of the Magic Kingdom's yearly attendance.
While I personally think Tiana is very much a disappointment (especially when judged against Splash), this is really not a thing amongst the general public/average Disney guest, at least not yet.
I don’t think how they spent the budget was the (main) issue. I can see where the money went—the attraction doesn’t look cheap to me, the screens notwithstanding. The biggest problem is the dull storyline, and that wouldn’t have taken a big budget to get right.
You know with how bad Imagination and SSE are, if this is what a fully funded attraction looks like then I don't want them touching them. The fact this and GotG have pretty crap stories as well makes me concerned about future "new" attractions. AA's look fantastic at the very least.From everything we can see this project has been fully financed. In the past there has been valid criticism that certain projects have been underfunded, but not the case here.
General Public aren't going to cancel their trip to the world's most famous four theme parks (with 51 other iconic rides to do, and countless world-class entertainment offerings) because one ride is a little underwhelming to a few thousand superfans.But you're not really thinking about it the way Disney would. That is potentially 2 to 300,000 parents that are watching this ride video and we're planning on potentially going to MK sometime in the next year. Partially, no doubt, because of this new ride.
They then watch it, are underwhelmed, read the comments, and decide to save their money and go elsewhere.
That's ~200,000 families so, roughly 800k-1 million people.
Then assume that they will mention this to friends and family, doubtless some of which will had heard about the new ride and may have been thinking of going down themselves.
The number is still low when looking at an entire year's worth of attendance and assuming massive potential errors with the numbers above - since it's a small data set. But I would absolutely not write off the power of bad word of mouth and negative press, combined with millions of people being disenfranchised with Disney in general over the past few years. THEN add in the juggernaut that will be Epic Universe, opening next summer, andDisney could be in serious trouble here.
All these teams need direction and vision. They made the technical parts work nicely but it seem like there was no one shaping the overall direction of the project.The AA team, as usual, did exceptional work. WDI still excels here. But, the best figures are so expensive that we can’t actually get rides with dozens of actual AAs any more.
And no one seems to have noticed that part of what many loved about Splash was how cute the secondary characters were, especially their voices. They made Splash really charming.
I wish they had recorded some vocals for the new characters.
Anymore its turning into rollercoaster land but because it rains, they put them inside a box and its earth shattering.You know with how bad Imagination and SSE are, if this is what a fully funded attraction looks like then I don't want them touching them. The fact this and GotG have pretty crap stories as well makes me concerned about future "new" attractions. AA's look fantastic at the very least.
With who this is my question. I am a WDW guest mainly. I only visited DLR for the first time this year. For the several years leading up to my trip, I’ve seen nothing but positive things in Disney spaces and other non-Disney specific faces about it. The consensus I’ve seen is that it’s an improvement on the ride system of ToT and makes it more exciting with a more intense and fun drop sequence, even if the IP isn’t everyone’s favorite. The only contentious point I’ve seen after it opened and people experienced it was its outside appearance.Ok…but mission breakout doesn’t appear to be regarded in consensus as a huge success. It’s still pretty divisive.
Not sure if you know this or not, but has there been any sort of recognition, concern or any sort of acknowledgement towards the negative reaction this ride has gotten from people in power?As it sounds right now? Absolutely not. High on hubris.
When things go down on this ride, it'll suffer more than Splash did.I feel it looks well done. Can't comment much on the story aspect until I ride it for myself. The silly concerns I have is this.
Disney is terrible at maintaining things. Which means, how long until a simple projector around water all the time, stops working then the screens go dark. Also, simple things like the vegetables swinging on the upper part that overlooks the bridge, how long until those stop swinging. They can put out a great product but forget some of their Keys... like, Show!
You kidding?Not sure if you know this or not, but has there been any sort of recognition, concern or any sort of acknowledgement towards the negative reaction this ride has gotten from people in power?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.