I mentioned Mission: Break Out, not Mission: Space! Mission: Space is not my cup of tea either, but I'm not naming rides simply because I don't like them, or prefer the ride they replaced. My point is that California Adventure's ToT was not in "dire" need of replacement, relative to other areas of the park, and I don't think that's purely my opinion. I'm not saying I take issue with M:BO or dislike Guardians, or anything like that; I don't have a sentimental attachment to ToT on any coast, I'm petrified of drop rides so the theme is immaterial to me personally. What I'm saying is that it seems like an odd thing to prioritize. Same w/ Paradise/Pixar Pier, which was popular and beloved long before the reskin. Another example is GMR to MMRR. Personally, I'm over the moon about MMRR and am more excited for this attraction than Tron or the GOTG coaster, among other announcements. But of all the available real estate in DHS (Star Tours which is about to become redundant, or any area of Animation Courtyard - Launch Bay is also now redundant, and TLM, Disney Jr. and other staples of AC either wouldn't be missed or could easily be relocated) why GMR? Again, it's not that I'm clinging to GMR, but rather that areas like Echo Lake and Animation Courtyard are the more logical areas to gut.
I'm more open to change than most, and I'm not really "grieving" any of the lost areas or attractions I've mentioned. I just consider them to be kind of weird decisions (lateral moves at best) and have trouble understanding how & why Disney prioritizes changing certain areas (which are "fine" in my estimation and many others') while letting areas like Dino-Rama sit untouched for decades. Obviously I'll never really understand these decisions & there could be underlying reasons I'm not aware of, I get that! But I'm on these forums to speculate, so I'm speculating.