The real issue with the rich is not that they exist but that they reject meaning. To the modern multimillionaire, money exists for its own sake. Rather than viewing money as a means, money is viewed as an ends. As a result, they build large mansions but they are sterile and have nothing to offer. There is no aesthetic merit, they are not even comfortable homes, they only exist to flaunt one's wealth.
This was not the case with the wealthy of the past. To yesterday's multimillionaires, money was a means to do good for others. Andrew Carnegie is the best example of this as writes about it in his excellent essay, "
The Gospel of Wealth." With his money he built libraries, museums, and schools. Carnegie used his money to aid those without. This is because he recognized that knowledge, art, and human beings all had inherent value. The money was not an end for Carnegie, but rather a means to achieve the ends of truth, goodness, and beauty.
Obviously modern billionaires and corporations also donate to charity, but this is done more for tax write offs and selfish benefits rather than actually helping people. Consider
Google donating Chromebooks to classrooms. Even though computers are scientifically proven to be harmful to education, Google donates them to schools because it helps them make money in the long run.
I could write a lot more about this (such as the parallel of billionaires : money :: politicians : power), but to please Disney Irish I will refrain from pontificating further and criticizing his worldview.