I like your avatar.Fine. Take away the Disney look. Go be Target-dressed. Along with those go pretty much all the behaviors and mentality that quantified the Disney experience for most guests. Whether they recognized it or not. Now, besides variances in IP, you have Uni and Disney as virtually indistinguishable from one another. Or any other second/third tier amusement park.
It's funny how many here are so "woke" they can't even argue intelligently about this. "It's just the way things are nowadays". Yadda yadda yadda. Or that some minority interest group (pick anyone not 'in the majority', whatever that is) is butthurt THEIR specific needs aren't met to THEIR satisfaction by a global company policy for tens of thousands.
If those of y'all who are complaining here are SO unhappy, take you money somewhere else. But no, you'd rather the SJWs unite! Evil corporation must change to suit us.<sigh>
So sad.
Fine. Take away the Disney look. Go be Target-dressed. Along with those go pretty much all the behaviors and mentality that quantified the Disney experience for most guests. Whether they recognized it or not. Now, besides variances in IP, you have Uni and Disney as virtually indistinguishable from one another. Or any other second/third tier amusement park.
It's funny how many here are so "woke" they can't even argue intelligently about this. "It's just the way things are nowadays". Yadda yadda yadda. Or that some minority interest group (pick anyone not 'in the majority', whatever that is) is butthurt THEIR specific needs aren't met to THEIR satisfaction by a global company policy for tens of thousands.
If those of y'all who are complaining here are SO unhappy, take you money somewhere else. But no, you'd rather the SJWs unite! Evil corporation must change to suit us.<sigh>
So sad.
I like your avatar.
What makes you think this is a slippery slope? Why can't it just be a change? If Disney CMs started looking sloppy and unkempt, I think would make sense to express frustration or mock them with a clever Lion King joke. But why do you see the allowance of 1" beards, necklaces, and pendants as indicative that Disney has no standards for CM appearance?Hmm...Relaxing the standards. That doesn't sound like it could hurt anything....as you slide down the slippery slope. See that Simba, Carnys, everything that light touches. What about Over there in the darkness, Happy Carnys, Simba.
If this was the only changes I do not think most would have a problem. One point I see like has been said is hey why not a 1.5 inch beard or how about two bracelets. that is not much of a change.......three years later I only want to add.5 inches to my beardWhat makes you think this is a slippery slope? Why can't it just be a change? If Disney CMs started looking sloppy and unkempt, I think would make sense to express frustration or mock them with a clever Lion King joke. But why do you see the allowance of 1" beards, necklaces, and pendants as indicative that Disney has no standards for CM appearance?
This is not the first change and it goes along with other decisions that show less concern with the image of Disney’s designed spaces.What makes you think this is a slippery slope? Why can't it just be a change? If Disney CMs started looking sloppy and unkempt, I think would make sense to express frustration or mock them with a clever Lion King joke. But why do you see the allowance of 1" beards, necklaces, and pendants as indicative that Disney has no standards for CM appearance?
It's always the argument against any kind of progressive change. People predicting WDW soon being staffed by carnies if in 2019 grooming standards are updated to allow them a beard or some subtle jewellery is the equivalent in this debate of those who argued that people would be marrying their dogs by now.What makes you think this is a slippery slope? Why can't it just be a change?
How are personal and even issued accessories that are not a designed part of the costume and experience “progressive”?It's always the argument against any kind of progressive change. People predicting WDW soon being staffed by carnies if in 2019 grooming standards are updated to allow them a beard or some subtle jewellery is the equivalent in this debate of those who argued that people would be marrying their dogs by now.
The original "Disney look" had nothing to do with supporting the theme of the parks. It had to do with projecting a wholesome, clean cut image in line with the values of the time the park opened. In many ways, it went against the themed environments. I'm sure there are plenty of people who miss those days when everyone who worked there and most of the visitors looked like they could have stepped out of Leave it to Beaver. However, others think it's good that people who would never have been hired back when the park opened are now deemed worthy because of what can be considered progressive social changes.How are personal and even issued accessories that are not a designed part of the costume and experience “progressive”?
The original "Disney look" had nothing to do with supporting the theme of the parks. It had to do with projecting a wholesome, clean cut image in line with the values of the time the park opened. In many ways, it went against the themed environments. I'm sure there are plenty of people who miss those days when everyone who worked there and most of the visitors looked like they could have stepped out of Leave it to Beaver. However, others think it's good that people who would never have been hired back when the park opened are now deemed worthy because of what can be considered progressive social changes.
My assumption here is that this change is meant to boost CM morale in some way and help them in hiring and keeping good employees by keeping them happy by allowing some small expressions of individuality. These expressions are in line with how society as a whole has changed.
This employee is behind the scenes and not in public view very oftenView attachment 419679
But we're all okay with this guy's appearance who is infinitely more visible than just about any singular cast member in the parks, huh?
This employee is behind the scenes and not in public view very often
The Cleavers were not opposed to accessorizing and jewelry.The original "Disney look" had nothing to do with supporting the theme of the parks. It had to do with projecting a wholesome, clean cut image in line with the values of the time the park opened. In many ways, it went against the themed environments. I'm sure there are plenty of people who miss those days when everyone who worked there and most of the visitors looked like they could have stepped out of Leave it to Beaver. However, others think it's good that people who would never have been hired back when the park opened are now deemed worthy because of what can be considered progressive social changes.
My assumption here is that this change is meant to boost CM morale in some way and help them in hiring and keeping good employees by keeping them happy by allowing some small expressions of individuality. These expressions are in line with how society as a whole has changed.
This employee is behind the scenes and not in public view very often
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.