LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
The repeated references to Frida Kahlo, who died in 1954, are a pretty big clue!Other than TV and Eletricity nothing in the Land of the Living really puts it in the 20th century.
The repeated references to Frida Kahlo, who died in 1954, are a pretty big clue!Other than TV and Eletricity nothing in the Land of the Living really puts it in the 20th century.
I said land of the Living, we already have a show in Frontierland that features a song from a 1950s TV Show. Inside the rides can be their own thing, besides we have a 1920s era Jungle Cruise coexisting with a 1600s Pirate fort one land over. And in Liberty Square, we have a piano appearing in the revolutionary period when harpsichords were far more popular in the states (and still extremely rare.)The repeated references to Frida Kahlo, who died in 1954, are a pretty big clue!
Guardians threw continuity to the wind harder then any other attraction.
I know. That’s where the repeated references to Frida happen. [ETA: Sorry, I misread your post; I was referring to the Land of the Dead.]I said land of the Living
They make convenient, plentiful time travel central to the story (even though it has absolutely no impact on the ride experience whatsoever) which very obviously demolishes the plot of Endgame.Forgive me. I have never been on it. But It seemed like a fight with some big boss dude that we never saw in the MCU so I assumed nothing really breaking the story.
In any case my point is valid. Using the doctor is an obvious choice that makes sense and yet here we are thinking disney isn’t using him because he died?
I'm not so sure about the 1600's; could have been but I'd say 1500's is the better guess.coexisting with a 1600s Pirate fort
The golden age of piracy was 1650-1730 hence my pick of 1600s.I'm not so sure about the 1600's; could have been but I'd say 1500's is the better guess.
Also, I wouldn't really call it a pirate fort. Pirates merely ransacked it. Spain built Caribbean forts in the 1500's for trading, protection and provisions for their ships.
The costumes of Pirates of the Caribbean situate the ride in the eighteenth century, though some of the women are wearing dresses more suggestive of the nineteenth. The architecture could, of course, date from earlier, but the attraction's exterior belongs stylistically to the 1600s or 1700s.I'm not so sure about the 1600's; could have been but I'd say 1500's is the better guess.
Also, I wouldn't really call it a pirate fort. Pirates merely ransacked it. Spain built Caribbean forts in the 1500's for trading, protection and provisions for their ships.
Well, we can stop wondering: there's a plaque on the building inscribed with its name and supposed date, which is 1643:I won't argue against costuming being 1700 and 1800ish but the fortress itself sure looks like some mighty early Spain creations as in 1500's. But yes, it just might be 1600 built.
Very possible that structures built hundreds of years earlier still get used.
When I was a kid we always tried to read Roman numerals, so I'm something of an expert. That one clearly says: "med-kicks-lee-add."Well, we can stop wondering: there's a plaque on the building inscribed with its name and supposed date, which is 1643:
When this was added I don't know; it doesn't look to me like something from 1973, when the ride first opened. It's worth noting that the "A.D." is in the wrong place—it should precede the date, not follow it.
I believe the plaque was added in 2006 during the refurbishment that added Jack Sparrow.Well, we can stop wondering: there's a plaque on the building inscribed with its name and supposed date, which is 1643:
When this was added I don't know; it doesn't look to me like something from 1973, when the ride first opened. It's worth noting that the "A.D." is in the wrong place—it should precede the date, not follow it.
Thanks—it definitely has that feel about it!I believe the plaque was added in 2006 during the refurbishment that added Jack Sparrow.
I think it's 1643 AD?When I was a kid we always tried to read Roman numerals, so I'm something of an expert. That one clearly says: "med-kicks-lee-add."
That might've been the case in the 90s, but Nightmare is pretty mainstream now. Jack is everywhere during Halloween, you can't go in a Halloween section without seeing him.Nightmare is SUPER niche. It has a dedicated core of fans but casuals aren't into it and would have no idea who "Oogie Boogie" is.
Hot Topic really pulled that IP out of being niche. This and Invader Zim really benefited from Mall Goths.There was a 110 minute wait to meet Jack Skellington at last night's Christmas party. That was before the party started and continued to be that long throughout the night.
I wouldn’t be shocked if they updated the sensors and computer system of the ride as well. If I recall correctly, there are two independent computer systems running the ride and occasionally issues are caused by them not being in sync. This could likely be changed to a single, more reliable system.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.