-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
SAVI - Stanza V: Team S.E.A. - PortaAdventura
- Thread starter NateD1226
- Start date
kmbmw777
Well-Known Member
I read up a little bit on this park and this is what I learned:
2 parks in this resort and a waterpark. The main park (Portaventure park)has themed lands based on different civilizations (Mediterranean, Old West, Mexico, China, and Polynesia) and each land has a collection of flat rides and coasters much like a six flags park here.
the second park is where I think the problems are. Basically, the park is a land called FerrariLand and has a giant coaster and a kids zone. I think we should definitely seek a way to improve this to make it a full blown second gate for the resort.
2 parks in this resort and a waterpark. The main park (Portaventure park)has themed lands based on different civilizations (Mediterranean, Old West, Mexico, China, and Polynesia) and each land has a collection of flat rides and coasters much like a six flags park here.
the second park is where I think the problems are. Basically, the park is a land called FerrariLand and has a giant coaster and a kids zone. I think we should definitely seek a way to improve this to make it a full blown second gate for the resort.
AceAstro
Well-Known Member
Any ideas for how to expand this**
kmbmw777
Well-Known Member
My initial concerns are that we don't want to anger the Ferrari company by removing their name from the park title, but at the same time, a park themed to Ferraris is like the most limiting theme we could ever work with. It would probably cost a signifant amount of money to break the contract with them just for the theme park name itself.
That being said, I think we need to spend that money to remove their name from the park itself. They can stay in their own land, but we now have room to expand into other themes.
I think we should partner with two other companies and create two other lands. The companies we partner with could probably give us additional funding through sponsorship. Let's say we choose Boeing (planes) and Feadship (boats). Then we could have a park themed to all three frontiers (land, sea, and sky).
I'm not married to this idea, but its super hard to brainstorm expansions for a Ferrari themed park.
kmbmw777
Well-Known Member
The attractions in these two lands would feature their respective elements I think.
Not to get ambitious, but the Feadship land could feature a log flume, river rapids,Nemo-like submarine ride while the Boeing land could feature a simulator, winged coaster, etc. Also there is probably a lot of opportunities for edutainment, especially in the engineering section.
AceAstro
Well-Known Member
I love that idea so so so so so much!! I think that’s a solid way to go as it gives us a solid theme, great sponsors, and we could have a lot of fun with it!
Orange Cat
Well-Known Member
Tour of Ferrari-land. 1. @kmbmw777 considering ad revenue to add to are budget is just, well, Genius! 2. Now sponsorship wise, not all of these have much potential for that.... but what about taking the Ferrari theme as a base to make a tech/vehicle themed with lands like - a tomorrow land that’s not just “Tomorrow Land’ - a worlds fair or steampunk land - a hub (where most the Ferrari theming could go) - & a dedicated kids land (presumably themed to a franchise).
kmbmw777
Well-Known Member
Plus we can sneak additional funding without those LAND agents noticing!
mwhahahahaha
Are you familiar with any boat manufacturers though? Feadship isn't that big (and I only found them because I googled 'yacht manufacturers').
Or really any aquatic based company?
Orange Cat
Well-Known Member
Also, just saying that @kmbmw777 ‘s idea is better. Just wanna have lots of options open to us.
kmbmw777
Well-Known Member
I think that the kids land and Tomorrowland would feel completely disconnected from the rest of the park (which would still be named Ferrari world, because it would probably be super expensive to break contract).
kmbmw777
Well-Known Member
Not necessarily better lol. Its a super messy park that we were thrown into, and fixing it would be tied up in a lot of legal fees which I'm not sure if we would have the capabilities to squash. That's why I figured getting two new sponsors would be equivalent to demoting one old one.
Orange Cat
Well-Known Member
We could partner with a sporting goods company (though, I think that would send a weird message)Plus we can sneak additional funding without those LAND agents noticing!
mwhahahahaha
Are you familiar with any boat manufacturers though? Feadship isn't that big (and I only found them because I googled 'yacht manufacturers').
Or really any aquatic based company?
AceAstro
Well-Known Member
I will get back to you on possible options for sponsors that make sense for attractions!
Orange Cat
Well-Known Member
That’s, just...... YES!
Home
oceana.org
What about a company that is actively working to protect our oceans? That would send a positive message and encourage people to donate to their cause.
kmbmw777
Well-Known Member
Personally, I am more a fan of using a boating company, because I feel that it relates to water in the same way that Ferrari relates to land.
What about using a cruise company as sponsor, like Royal Caribbean?
Orange Cat
Well-Known Member
Just checking, so far our lands are; - Ocean land (sponsored by, Oceana? Royal Caribbean? Capri sun
?) - sky land - land land (sponsored by Ferrari, of course!) - Hub. Is that correct?
?) - sky land - land land (sponsored by Ferrari, of course!) - Hub. Is that correct?