News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Sure, the Hamilton County Development Authority was not in compliance with Florida Statute 189, and was subject to dissolution unless the legislature re-established it in compliance with the law. The district was re-established in HB 1169 and changed the governance board in a matter similar to CFTOD, with the governor now appointing 5 of the board seats, and was brought into compliance with F.S. 189.

Since I know you're going to say that the governor appointing the board and bringing into compliance with the law isn't substantive, I'll go for another example: Bradford County Development Authority was dissolved, it no longer exists, which is a much more substantive change then RCID got.

Now can you name any district in the state that has a charter not in compliance with F.S. 189 since Florida law required them to be dissolved on June 1, 2023? I'll give you a hint, there were 6 district in the State of Florida NOT in compliance with F.S. 189 back in 2022, and they were:
  • Bradford County Development Authority (Bradford County)
  • Eastpoint Water and Sewer District (Franklin County)
  • Hamilton County Development Authority (Hamilton County)
  • Marion County Law Library (Marion County)
  • Reedy Creek Improvement District (Orange and Osceola Counties)
  • Sunshine Water Control District (Broward County
As far as I can tell, they were all either re-established and modified to be in compliance with F.S. 189 (RCID/CFTOD included), or they were dissolved.
Neither development authority had ad valorem taxing authority or provided any municipal services. So yeah, not nearly as substantive as becoming an appointed district with ad valorem taxing powers.
 

lewisc

Well-Known Member
A few posters seem to have issues including using tax exempt bonds for parking. Public parking is legit. The bonds are being paid by taxes Disney is paying instead of parking fees. Why should any of us care?

Look at the deals professional sports teams are getting to build stadiums. Economic benefits to the locale are vastly overstated
 
Last edited:

Nevermore525

Well-Known Member
A few posters seem to have issues including using tax exempt bonds for parking. Public parking is legit. The bonds are being paid by taxes Disney is paying instead of parking fees. Why should any of us car

Look at the deals professional sports teams are getting to build stadiums. Economic benefits to the locale are vastly overstated
Closest stadiums to me recently got $600M each in bonds from the state to renovate however they see fit. No restrictions on what they do with the $$.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
So the increases in employment and in sales tax revenues - to both the state and county, but not the district - doesn't pass the smell test?
Did the increase in employment and sales tax revenues promises not exist when Disney added PI and Westside?

Are you just looking for reasons that RCID shouldn't exist?
Cite one time anywhere in this thread I even suggested as such.
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
The law that dissolved RCID did dissolve ALL special districts in the state that were given unlimited power and are not compliant with laws and regulations that set barriers to what special districts could do, that was created at a later date. RCID was not the only one dissolved, its just the only one people care about because they feel Disney needs special tax breaks on top of what everybody else gets.
I’m sure this has already been addressed by others but this paragraph is wildly misinformed and inaccurate. Have you even attempted to understand the topic you’re trying to discuss?
 
Last edited:

tissandtully

Well-Known Member
The law that dissolved RCID did dissolve ALL special districts in the state that were given unlimited power and are not compliant with laws and regulations that set barriers to what special districts could do, that was created at a later date. RCID was not the only one dissolved, its just the only one people care about because they feel Disney needs special tax breaks on top of what everybody else gets.
Tell me you didn't read the law without telling me you didn't read the law
 

Prince-1

Well-Known Member


ETA: I don’t use Twitter/X and don’t know the commentator whose account this tweet is taken from. This just happened to be the best footage I could find of the speech.


That was perfectly said to an absolute joke of a human being. The majority of people couldn’t care if she and her husband had a threesome but don’t go preaching about morality and then do what they did.
 

Brian

Well-Known Member
A politician being a hypocrite?

CUMqPkCWEAEW6yY.jpg
 

DCBaker

Premium Member
Disney has filed a new lawsuit today against the CFTOD.

Here are the details via News 6 (there's a copy of the complaint at the link below).

"Walt Disney Parks and Resorts filed a lawsuit late Friday accusing the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, or CFTOD, of failing to preserve and turn over public records in violation of Florida law and the state’s constitution.

The entertainment company is asking an Orange County circuit court judge to set an “immediate” hearing to declare that CFTOD is unlawfully withholding public records and order the agency to immediately provide Disney with all outstanding requested records.

Earlier this year, the Florida legislature made several changes to the special taxing district, formerly known as the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which provides government services to the Walt Disney World resort property.

In February, Gov. Ron DeSantis replaced Disney loyalists on the district’s board with his own appointees.

In its newly filed lawsuit, Disney claims CFTOD has failed to fully respond to a public record request the company submitted to the government agency on May 11.

The lawsuit also accuses CFTOD of allowing District employees and board members to use personal electronic devices and personal email and messaging accounts for government business without adequate processes to ensure public records are preserved or produced.

Disney claims as many as 50 employees have departed CFTOD since DeSantis appointed the new board in February, with remaining employees “exhausted” and lacking confidence in the new administration.

“On the public records front, this has led to delays, inadequate preservation, storage and production of public records, and improper and unsupported claims of privilege and exemption from disclosure, in violation of the Florida Constitution and (Florida’s Public Record Act),” the lawsuit states.

According to Disney’s complaint, CFTOD relies on board members and employees, including District Administrator Glenton Gillian, to “self-select text messages or emails responsive to public record requests on their own, without technical instruction from the District or any effort to verify compliance.”

Disney’s lawsuit alleges that CFTOD failed to preserve data from the personal devices of departing employees.

A CFTOD spokesperson did not immediately respond to the lawsuit, which was filed shortly before the close of business day Friday ahead of the Christmas holiday weekend."

 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
Disney has filed a new lawsuit today against the CFTOD.

Here are the details via News 6 (there's a copy of the complaint at the link below).

"Walt Disney Parks and Resorts filed a lawsuit late Friday accusing the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, or CFTOD, of failing to preserve and turn over public records in violation of Florida law and the state’s constitution.

The entertainment company is asking an Orange County circuit court judge to set an “immediate” hearing to declare that CFTOD is unlawfully withholding public records and order the agency to immediately provide Disney with all outstanding requested records.

Earlier this year, the Florida legislature made several changes to the special taxing district, formerly known as the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which provides government services to the Walt Disney World resort property.

In February, Gov. Ron DeSantis replaced Disney loyalists on the district’s board with his own appointees.

In its newly filed lawsuit, Disney claims CFTOD has failed to fully respond to a public record request the company submitted to the government agency on May 11.

The lawsuit also accuses CFTOD of allowing District employees and board members to use personal electronic devices and personal email and messaging accounts for government business without adequate processes to ensure public records are preserved or produced.

Disney claims as many as 50 employees have departed CFTOD since DeSantis appointed the new board in February, with remaining employees “exhausted” and lacking confidence in the new administration.

“On the public records front, this has led to delays, inadequate preservation, storage and production of public records, and improper and unsupported claims of privilege and exemption from disclosure, in violation of the Florida Constitution and (Florida’s Public Record Act),” the lawsuit states.

According to Disney’s complaint, CFTOD relies on board members and employees, including District Administrator Glenton Gillian, to “self-select text messages or emails responsive to public record requests on their own, without technical instruction from the District or any effort to verify compliance.”

Disney’s lawsuit alleges that CFTOD failed to preserve data from the personal devices of departing employees.

A CFTOD spokesperson did not immediately respond to the lawsuit, which was filed shortly before the close of business day Friday ahead of the Christmas holiday weekend."

And may I take this opportunity to wish the CFTOD a very merry Christmas.....
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom