lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Ok, I'll take that at face value that others are saying that.
I'm not saying that. All I'm saying is, Reedy Creek serves a decent purpose that is good for the state, and good for Disney. But the scenario that RCID was created for no longer exists, and tidying things up isn't a bad thing. I'm arguing for the opposite of special treatment.
The problem is this has become wrapped up in the separate issue of the governor's retribution. So of course since it's now all political, we can't possibly have a conversation about the merits of special district reform.
The District was created to promote tourism. That purpose still exists. You haven’t made any independent case for these reforms beyond vague issues that you don’t really define. These matters have been reviewed, the powers of the District are regulated. Why does the District using the Florida Fire Prevention Code need to be reviewed?
Last edited by a moderator: