alissafalco
Well-Known Member
Smoke and mirrors
Great. Pass the Pixie Dust.
And WDW just gave them a cardboard box they can touch their wristband to enter - as long as they schedule it 6 months in advance.Give a 4 year old a cardboard box. They will be beaming. Just grinning from ear to ear and having a grand old time.
Unlike Pixie dust, which is addictive, so one must be careful how much they snort.What an adorably cute rhetorical device.
Keep using it as often as you can. I'm certain it will only get more effective with time. . .
What an adorably cute rhetorical device.
Keep using it as often as you can. I'm certain it will only get more effective with time. . .
Ah, great. Another newb who has it all figured out.
I'll keep working with what's been successful, thanks.
Ah, great. Another newb who has it all figured out.
I'll keep working with what's been successful, thanks.
Seems to be that YOU'RE the one who doesn't care for the parks, considering how complacent you are when they're falling so far behind the competition. No, not in numbers, but in quality; the parks are NOT "doing fine".Funny thing is that some folks around here seem to not really care at all for the parks, yet they hang around these forums still. Weird use of one's time IMO.
Disney seems to know what they are doing, the parks are doing fine. Heck I wish there were fewer park goers
http://bensonian.org/2012/02/10/defending-ad-hominem-arguments/
Don't you mean "magical"?
You made a great point about mission space. Even though it replaced a beloved attraction, it was easily one of the most innovative rides in a long time.
Because there is nothing even remotely close in how the ride operates.... Its very different and they attacked the idea of a simulator from a completely new direction. The made a centrifuge.. That's outside the box thinking unfortunately its not a great ride and its less popular that the one it replaced. To deny that there was Not/ anything different about this than any other simulator is wayyyy of base.Really? What do you see as being so innovative?
For me, apart from having the controls in your face its pretty much Wild Artic from Seaworld or anyother simulator type attractions.
Because there is nothing even remotely close in how the ride operates.... Its very different and they attacked the idea of a simulator from a completely new direction. The made a centrifuge.. That's outside the box thinking unfortunately its not a great ride and its less popular that the one it replaced. To deny that there was Not/ anything different about this than any other simulator is wayyyy of base.
A replica of other Sim ride is kind of belittling it a touch. There are sustained g forces on that attraction. As far as I know, zero other simulators offer this. It was a bit more innovative than you're willing to give it credit for. Now if you ask me I dont need to ride it and I don't think it touches actual attractions like mummy or potter or even everest in A mode, but it is much more than just an actuated platform and a projection screen.Ok so they way they went about achieving the same effect is innovative, but the end result is still a replica of other sim rides.
You can ride this and watch a simulation video on your smart phone, all without Fastpass+. Innovative.A replica of other Sim ride is kind of belittling it a touch. There are sustained g forces on that attraction. As far as I know, zero other simulators offer this.
Which do you prefer, apples or oranges?You can ride this and watch a simulation video on your smart phone, all without Fastpass+. Innovative.
OrangesWhich do you prefer, apples or oranges?
Trust me I do too. Given the choice I would have taken the old ride or a modernized version of it. Everytime we lose an omnimover I die a little inside. BUT!!!! Mission space is not just any other simulator. Was it sort of a failure? You could say that.Oranges
...that is why I liked Horizons.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.