ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
Surely. I'm just impressed that there are 4-year olds reading architecture textbooks.Yes, clearly that's what I was saying. Sheesh.
The knee jerk inferiority complex reaction that so commonly pops up around here is truly annoying.
Anyway, what I'm saying is, is that a child learns to enjoy what they are exposed to. If they are exposed to 50 foot tall cartoon characters, they are going to think that is awesome. If they are exposed to something else, it's very possible they will think that is awesome.
I just think the characters are a safer bet. There are more movies and Saturday morning cartoons featuring animated characters than there are architecture specials. And this isn't really Disney responding to a "fad"...kids have enjoyed animated features for decades (and adults! The story of the Lion King is a little too complicated for young kids to fully understand, I think). Following a fad would have involved building Disney's All-Star Power Rangers Resort in the '90s, which they, thankfully, did not. They've mostly chosen timeless characters, which they also have been designing rides around since 1955 (though there admittedly is more of a character-driven focus now). Most of Disney's resorts borrow a theme from the theme parks; the values mostly borrow from Fantasyland. Not a crime, I don't think.