• Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.You can use your Twitter or Facebook account to sign up, or register directly.

New “High Surf” B&M Coaster for 2023

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
If Tron was unthemed and open-air, it could’ve opened when they completed the circuit back in what, 2019? Two completely different circumstances
True…but you think they have a real desire to “push it”? No evidence of that
I really think SeaWorld should diversify with Intamin and/or RMC. This seems borderline redundant. But I get it, they are sticking with the “safest” (as in most reliable and highest range of appeal) choice - B&M.
What would matter if they stick with B&M? They’re high capacity, smooth and incredibly reliable.

Unlike ROTR (nap material) 😎
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
True…but you think they have a real desire to “push it”? No evidence of that

What would matter if they stick with B&M? They’re high capacity, smooth and incredibly reliable.

Unlike ROTR (nap material) 😎

Have you ridden an RMC or modern Intamin like Velocicoaster? They are thrilling and exhilarating in all the ways modern B&Ms are not. Modern B&M specializes in coasters that draw the general public's attention but are standard, bland layouts that aren't actually that thrilling or intense. Most B&Ms are good, very few are great. A good coaster park (what SWO is clearly wanting to be now) has a variety of coaster manufacturers and styles.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Have you ridden an RMC or modern Intamin like Velocicoaster? They are thrilling and exhilarating in all the ways modern B&Ms are not. Modern B&M specializes in coasters that draw the general public's attention but are standard, bland layouts that aren't actually that thrilling or intense. Most B&Ms are good, very few are great. A good coaster park (what SWO is clearly wanting to be now) has a variety of coaster manufacturers and styles.
I’ll grant you that…b&m could use some new gimmicks. Think that’s what they’re trying for here.

Lack of launches and the “shelf” drops do get pretty bland.

But consistency is still huge. What’s the point of building something new if it takes too long and sucks?

Haven’t tried veloci yet…but I’ve seen the feedback and I’m sure I’ll love it. We shouldn’t talk about it here though…it’s a good symbol of what they can’t do down the road.
 

SplashZander

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I’ll grant you that…b&m could use some new gimmicks. Think that’s what they’re trying for here.

Lack of launches and the “shelf” drops do get pretty bland.

But consistency is still huge. What’s the point of building something new if it takes too long and sucks?

Haven’t tried veloci yet…but I’ve seen the feedback and I’m sure I’ll love it. We shouldn’t talk about it here though…it’s a good symbol of what they can’t do down the road.
VelociCoaster is better than doing the dirty
 

matt9112

Well-Known Member
Have you ridden an RMC or modern Intamin like Velocicoaster? They are thrilling and exhilarating in all the ways modern B&Ms are not. Modern B&M specializes in coasters that draw the general public's attention but are standard, bland layouts that aren't actually that thrilling or intense. Most B&Ms are good, very few are great. A good coaster park (what SWO is clearly wanting to be now) has a variety of coaster manufacturers and styles.

Complacency. That’s what happens to B&M
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
Complacency. That’s what happens to B&M

I mean I get it, it's a business model that works well for them. Parks love them because of their reliability and they're usually crowd pleasers. They create big, impressive looking layouts with big sweeping elements that draw attention and look imposing, but actually give a comparatively mild ride so the public eats them up. Not all of their designs are mild, but their floorless coasters, wing riders, dive coasters, and hypers/gigas typically are.
 

matt9112

Well-Known Member
I mean I get it, it's a business model that works well for them. Parks love them because of their reliability and they're usually crowd pleasers. They create big, impressive looking layouts with big sweeping elements that draw attention and look imposing, but actually give a comparatively mild ride so the public eats them up. Not all of their designs are mild, but their floorless coasters, wing riders, dive coasters, and hypers/gigas typically are.

Mild by todays standards….yes mild period? Eh I disagree. I mean for Christ sake iron gwazi picks you up and smashes your brain into another demension and at the brake run you legitimately have no idea what the hell just happened.

I will say MAKO is amazing and those tall butter smooth coasters have a place. The restraint system is bonkers when it first came out. There traditional coasters are lack luster in my opinion kraken,hulk,kunba all make my head hurt more than it should with hulk being the best of the three obviously.

There dive coasters are also admittedly one trick ponies. But they do offer a unique trick.

B&M however is the undisputed champion of the suspended coaster….it’s sad to me that almost nobody builds these anymore. MONTU is still probably in my top 5 of all time coasters.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Top Bottom