PeterAlt
Well-Known Member
It's good what he has done for DCA but that wouldn't have happened if John Lassetter didn't kick and scream for it. It's good for China what he is doing in Shanghai and the expansion of HKDL, but at what expense at the US parks? The investment in China will pay off in the long term at the expense of US parks short term.Iger has done some great things. Buy Marvel and Lucasfilm...can't argue with that. But, for whatever reason, the last 6-8 years for DHS, Epcot, Animal Kindgom has received little love or attention as far as rides.
Not sure why?
Maybe the numbers are so good, they don't need to add additional attractions. Why spend money when you don't need to spend money?
For first time visitors, they are amazing parks with plenty to see. I'm just not a first time visitor anymore and it's hard to spend hard earned money on repeat after repeat viewing.
It's why Disneyland to me is looking more attractive for my family. I have never been to california adventure, my kids have never been to any Disney Park. It will be a new experience for all of us and make it that more enjoyable.
Do you see anything wrong with throwing the studio division as much money as they want and not match just a small portion of that to any park attraction at WDW? The $190 million Lone Ranger lose could have bought a new E-ticket at any of the four parks. And that's just one movie of dozens with that budget in recent years. The $200 million lose John Carter could have added Fire Mountain, for example. Of course they don't know which movies will make money until they are released and each is a risk. All I'm saying is they need to lessen that risk by putting some into attractions at US parks.
As of now, they are riding on investments made during the Eisner era. The next CEO will have no investments made during the Iger era to ride on. Why does Brian Roberts seems to get it and not Iger?